Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-25-2012, 09:10 PM
 
Location: Golden, CO
2,108 posts, read 2,894,838 times
Reputation: 1027

Advertisements

Quote:
Halperin: Why not in the first year, if you're elected -- why not in 2013, go all the way and propose the kind of budget with spending restraints, that you'd like to see after four years in office? Why not do it more quickly?
Romney: Well because, if you take a trillion dollars for instance, out of the first year of the federal budget, that would shrink GDP over 5%. That is by definition throwing us into recession or depression. So I'm not going to do that, of course.
Romney explains that austerity, during the recovery from a Great Recession, would cause catastrophic damage to our nation. The problem, of course, is that the Republican congressional leadership is committed to imposing austerity on the nation and Speaker Boehner has just threatened that Republicans will block the renewal of the debt ceiling in order to extort Democrats to agree to austerity -- severe cuts to social programs. Romney knows this could "throw us into recession or depression" and says he would never follow such a policy.

William K. Black: Romney Messes Up, Tells the Truth About Austerity
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-26-2012, 06:01 AM
 
Location: Sonoran Desert
39,078 posts, read 51,239,172 times
Reputation: 28324
This is the crux of the problem with Romney. He is a smart guy, but his party is under the control of a bunch of idiots. Romney, himself, would probably be a decent president in time. But on his coattails are hanging all the tea baggers and evangelists and anti-government kooks. I think he will be unable to keep them under control as evidenced by his constantly needing to pander to them during the election process. If it were just Romney versus Obama I would have to give Romney a strong look. But it is not, and Obama is getting my vote.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2012, 09:11 AM
 
25,021 posts, read 27,938,262 times
Reputation: 11790
Wow, François Hollande, is that you?

Romney should at least name his opponent when he makes accusations like that, Ron Paul. But, of course, he doesn't exist, he's a figment of everyone's imagination
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2012, 09:21 AM
 
Location: Maryland
18,630 posts, read 19,421,721 times
Reputation: 6462
I love how liberals spin things. here's a basic identity in macoreconomics.

GDP = consumption + investment + (government spending) + (exports − imports)

If you reduce gov't spending all things being constant drastically you will reduce GDP. Romney is talking about this but yet again the ignorant Left thinks he is now a Keynesian. You reduce gov't spending gradually while raising the other factors in the equation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2012, 09:25 AM
 
25,021 posts, read 27,938,262 times
Reputation: 11790
Quote:
Originally Posted by EdwardA View Post
I love how liberals spin things. here's a basic identity in macoreconomics.

GDP = consumption + investment + (government spending) + (exports − imports)

If you reduce gov't spending all things being constant drastically you will reduce GDP. Romney is talking about this but yet again the ignorant Left thinks he is now a Keynesian. You reduce gov't spending gradually while raising the other factors in the equation.
Eventually, you will have to pay your creditors back. If it shows that you are unable and unwilling to pay back your loans, your line of credit will stop, and the ride is over. Printing more money while saying ********* I have the printing press, will send us to 3rd World purchasing power in a very short amount of time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2012, 09:30 AM
 
10,854 posts, read 9,303,308 times
Reputation: 3122
He sounds like a damn liberal!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2012, 09:32 AM
 
10,854 posts, read 9,303,308 times
Reputation: 3122
Quote:
Originally Posted by EdwardA View Post
I love how liberals spin things. here's a basic identity in macoreconomics.

GDP = consumption + investment + (government spending) + (exports − imports)

If you reduce gov't spending all things being constant drastically you will reduce GDP. Romney is talking about this but yet again the ignorant Left thinks he is now a Keynesian. You reduce gov't spending gradually while raising the other factors in the equation.
Nobody is saying Romney is a Keynesian, but the fact remains his position on this issue put in in agreement with the Obama Administration.

That's not really going to win him any points with die-hard conservatives.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2012, 09:34 AM
 
Location: Home, Home on the Front Range
25,826 posts, read 20,706,970 times
Reputation: 14818
Quote:
Originally Posted by JazzyTallGuy View Post
He sounds like a damn liberal!

Because he is a "damn liberal."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2012, 09:36 AM
 
10,854 posts, read 9,303,308 times
Reputation: 3122
Quote:
Originally Posted by theunbrainwashed View Post
Eventually, you will have to pay your creditors back. If it shows that you are unable and unwilling to pay back your loans, your line of credit will stop, and the ride is over. Printing more money while saying ********* I have the printing press, will send us to 3rd World purchasing power in a very short amount of time.
The United States has been more than willing to pay back its creditors, notwithstanding the idiots in the Republican Party that don't understand that raising the debt ceiling actually HURTS the economy.

The reason that U.S Treasury bonds and bills have such low interest rates is the financial markets are confident that they will be paid back.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2012, 09:59 AM
 
10,875 posts, read 13,813,272 times
Reputation: 4896
Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerLily24 View Post
Because he is a "damn liberal."
But he has an (R) next to his name, so that means it's ok and the right wing goons will support him.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:44 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top