Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 09-08-2012, 08:09 AM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,948,900 times
Reputation: 5661

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by EdwardA View Post
The job report and Romney ads will decimate Obama.
...based on nothing but wishful thinking on your part. The jobs report wasn't bad. It was just not good. It was at least positive, which is a sharp distinction from the jobs reports the President inherited.

But you can't blame Obama for weak jobs reports while the GOP denies the same President his jobs bill and other bills that would aid the economy.

 
Old 09-08-2012, 08:24 AM
 
172 posts, read 267,638 times
Reputation: 103
Quote:
Originally Posted by crbcrbrgv View Post
So tell me, what will Ryan and Romney do differently that will fix the economy?

Only a youtard could make such a blanket statement without offering any substance. Typical.
For one, they wont pander to loony environmentalists, they wont invest "green energy" companies that go bankrupt.

Energy independence will create thousands, if not millions of jobs. We can quit this "Eco friendly' nonsense, and use what we already have to lower costs, thus helping the economy.

Tackle the national debt, and deficit, the "fiscal cliff" that were about to go off of.

Stricter migration laws, so that illegals don't come here and lower wages and take jobs from citizens.
 
Old 09-08-2012, 08:32 AM
 
172 posts, read 267,638 times
Reputation: 103
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
...based on nothing but wishful thinking on your part. The jobs report wasn't bad. It was just not good. It was at least positive, which is a sharp distinction from the jobs reports the President inherited.

But you can't blame Obama for weak jobs reports while the GOP denies the same President his jobs bill and other bills that would aid the economy.

Jobs report wasn't bad? Bawhahahahahaha?

I wish Obama would say that.

96,000 jobs is horrible.

350,000 quit looking for work, which means that they have lost confidence.

Unemployment still above 8%.
 
Old 09-08-2012, 08:46 AM
 
4,120 posts, read 6,609,150 times
Reputation: 2290
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trace21230 View Post
Please post a non-partisan source. Nate Silver doesn't count.

Might be the dumbest thing ever posted.... Even though conservative hat the times it's still the paper of record in the U.S. Nate wouldn't have a job if he was a partisan hack at the times. Yes the opinion page is very leftest but the rest of the paper is excellent...
 
Old 09-08-2012, 08:47 AM
 
12,638 posts, read 8,954,468 times
Reputation: 7458
Quote:
Originally Posted by markymarq81 View Post
Jobs report wasn't bad? Bawhahahahahaha?

I wish Obama would say that.

96,000 jobs is horrible.

350,000 quit looking for work, which means that they have lost confidence.

Unemployment still above 8%.
The Obama drones can't cope with reality. The fact that she would say with a straight face that the jobs report wasn't bad tells you everything you need to know about her.
 
Old 09-08-2012, 08:49 AM
 
12,638 posts, read 8,954,468 times
Reputation: 7458
Quote:
Originally Posted by bellhead View Post
Might be the dumbest thing ever posted.... Even though conservative hat the times it's still the paper of record in the U.S. Nate wouldn't have a job if he was a partisan hack at the times. Yes the opinion page is very leftest but the rest of the paper is excellent...
The stupidest thing ever posted is your assertion that being a partisan hack somehow precludes somebody from being employed by a newspaper.
 
Old 09-08-2012, 08:58 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,108,083 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
...based on nothing but wishful thinking on your part. The jobs report wasn't bad. It was just not good. It was at least positive, which is a sharp distinction from the jobs reports the President inherited.
liberal standards for Democratic Presidents are beyond histerical..

the jobs report was HORRIBLE.. 369,000 people stopped looking for work..
 
Old 09-08-2012, 09:57 AM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,948,900 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by markymarq81 View Post
For one, they wont pander to loony environmentalists, they wont invest "green energy" companies that go bankrupt.

Energy independence will create thousands, if not millions of jobs. We can quit this "Eco friendly' nonsense, and use what we already have to lower costs, thus helping the economy.

Tackle the national debt, and deficit, the "fiscal cliff" that were about to go off of.

Stricter migration laws, so that illegals don't come here and lower wages and take jobs from citizens.
First, we have no idea who Romney will pander to because his record shows he's been on both sides of every issue. He was pro-choice before he wasn't; he was for gay equality, then against it; for assault weapons bans, then against them; for individual mandate, then not; etc., etc.

Second, being against green energy is moronic because it is the only actually clean and plentiful form of energy. If we don't develop it, we as a nation, will be behind China and all other nations. If the GOP is going to ignore renewal energy they are truly Neanderthals.

As one can see from the below chart, capacity doubled from 2005 to 2010 as is expected to continue.

mmmmmm

 
Old 09-08-2012, 10:05 AM
 
Location: NC
9,984 posts, read 10,392,719 times
Reputation: 3086
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trace21230 View Post
Link: American Research Group

Nice negative bounce, Dems!
Meh. It is ARG they make no bones about the fact they don't call cell phones and make no effort to adjust for it under the assumption that that 40% of the country just won't vote.
 
Old 09-08-2012, 10:11 AM
 
12,638 posts, read 8,954,468 times
Reputation: 7458
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomstudent View Post
Meh. It is ARG they make no bones about the fact they don't call cell phones and make no effort to adjust for it under the assumption that that 40% of the country just won't vote.
Do you liberals ever get anything right?

From the article:

Quote:
Romney leads Obama 50% to 46% among likely voters interviewed on a landline (83% of likely voters). Obama leads Romney 48% to 45% among likely voters interviewed on a cell phone (17% of likely voters).
Keep trying though!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:50 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top