Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-03-2015, 08:10 PM
 
6,500 posts, read 6,046,112 times
Reputation: 3603

Advertisements

I look at it this way. If you in any way, care about honesty, integrity, transparency, or ethics there is no way you could vote for Hillary. None. So at this point, you either are okay with the socialist, Sanders, who is at least honest, or you hope and push for someone else to run.

She has the famous name so she is always going to have a chance. That, and the media will no doubt promote her should she get the nod, while attacking the GOP candidate. So she has two big things, three actually, going for her. Name recognition, news media, and hollywood.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-03-2015, 08:44 PM
 
21,989 posts, read 15,742,226 times
Reputation: 12943
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
LMAO there goes your credibity. So I guess if a black person lies they all do?
You really are a sad one. Your party elected George W. Bush for the Republican president. Of course he spoke for the Republican Party.

Go ahead and scream Benghazi. It would be nice if the Republicans cared half as much about the thousands of soldiers who died in Iraq as they have the four who died in Benghazi. But they and you don't because it's not about people, it's about trying to drive a political story, just like Whitewater.

Now go get your cane and ask Sean Hannity what you should say next.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-03-2015, 09:49 PM
 
Location: Texas
37,963 posts, read 17,905,834 times
Reputation: 10379
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seacove View Post
You really are a sad one. Your party elected George W. Bush for the Republican president. Of course he spoke for the Republican Party.
The truth is sad? I guess to people like you. This thread is about your latest scumbag Hillary.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seacove View Post
Go ahead and scream Benghazi. It would be nice if the Republicans cared half as much about the thousands of soldiers who died in Iraq as they have the four who died in Benghazi.
LMAO The President controls troop movements and can bring the troops home at anytime. Yet you blame it on the Republicans? Your posts are a joke.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seacove View Post
But they and you don't because it's not about people, it's about trying to drive a political story, just like Whitewater.
Running guns in Benghazi is nothing like whitewater. Your posts are a joke. oh and make sure you don't refer to this truth when you respond.
Again
Many of the rebels Clinton armed, using the weapons lawfully sold to Qatar by Turi and others, were terrorist groups who are our sworn enemies. There was no congressional declaration of war, no congressional vote, no congressional knowledge beyond fewer than a dozen members, and no federal statute that authorized this.


Not that you're interested in the truth
Hillary Clinton: How much longer can she hide the truth? | Fox News

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seacove View Post
Now go get your cane and ask Sean Hannity what you should say next.
Now go look for the truth instead of asking your deny and deflect handlers what you should say next.
btw Hannity didn't break this.

keep posting, I love the misinformation and deflection.

Last edited by Loveshiscountry; 07-03-2015 at 10:35 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-04-2015, 08:03 PM
 
Location: Old Bellevue, WA
18,782 posts, read 17,385,739 times
Reputation: 7990
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
You don't agree with the truth? LMAO not surprising.

btw It was Bush who lied not the GOP, that's another thing, that you've gotten wrong.
Bush did not lie. Numerous sane and sober liberals, including liberal icon Bob Woodward and Yale law prof Stephen Carter have admitted this. How many times do we have to go over this simple point before it penetrates low-info skulls?

Yale prof confirms what all should have known: Bush did not lie about WMD.

Bob Woodward discovers the truth about Bush and Iraq...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-04-2015, 10:13 PM
 
2,950 posts, read 1,640,988 times
Reputation: 3797
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
You don't agree with the truth? LMAO not surprising.

btw It was Bush who lied not the GOP, that's another thing, that you've gotten wrong.
I don't think Bush lied.

He wasn't intelligent enough to pull it off without getting caught. I place the blame on Cheney and/or Rumsfeld. I believe they (and other people, probably even his father) convinced him that Iraq was an immediate danger to our country and convinced dubya to invade, ensuring him it was necessary and that it would be an easy victory. Hell, maybe they even told him that he would go down in history as a great liberator.

And he fell for it. Iran should put a statue of him in every one of their cities to show their gratitude.

Last edited by jburress; 07-04-2015 at 10:43 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-05-2015, 06:00 AM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,879,946 times
Reputation: 4585
Now the new scandal is Hillary is wearing shoes in NH Parade.... I think they were "navy Salvatore Ferragamo patent leather flats"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-05-2015, 06:22 AM
 
Location: Pittsburgh
7,541 posts, read 10,273,427 times
Reputation: 3510
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
Now the new scandal is Hillary is wearing shoes in NH Parade.... I think they were "navy Salvatore Ferragamo patent leather flats"
Ferragamo shoes are very expensive, someone who is pretending to be concerned about the "common people" and spends so much time whining about the rich, probably shouldn't be flaunting her considerable wealth like that.

If she wants to wear these shoes, a less tone-deaf individual would wear them privately and not where thousands will see them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-05-2015, 06:46 AM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,879,946 times
Reputation: 4585
Quote:
Originally Posted by I_Like_Spam View Post
Ferragamo shoes are very expensive, someone who is pretending to be concerned about the "common people" and spends so much time whining about the rich, probably shouldn't be flaunting her considerable wealth like that.

If she wants to wear these shoes, a less tone-deaf individual would wear them privately and not where thousands will see them.
Really? Wealthy people who want to help common people, should "pretend" that aren't wealthy? And by the way, she is whining about some of the rich, because their actions display disrespect for the common person.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-05-2015, 06:57 AM
 
Location: Pittsburgh
7,541 posts, read 10,273,427 times
Reputation: 3510
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
Really? Wealthy people who want to help common people, should "pretend" that aren't wealthy? And by the way, she is whining about some of the rich, because their actions display disrespect for the common person.

I'm not saying to pretend they aren't wealthy, just that it is incredibly gauche to flaunt your wealth like that.


If she had taken the money she paid for the expensive shoes and instead contributed it to the poor, it would have sent a message they care.


Flaunting her incredible wealth sends the messages eh is only out for herself and all the talk about caring about the poor is just b.s. designed to trick them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-05-2015, 06:59 AM
 
Location: West Michigan
12,372 posts, read 9,327,747 times
Reputation: 7364
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
Now the new scandal is Hillary is wearing shoes in NH Parade.... I think they were "navy Salvatore Ferragamo patent leather flats"
Ohmygod! There goes my vote!

Quote:
Originally Posted by I_Like_Spam View Post
Ferragamo shoes are very expensive, someone who is pretending to be concerned about the "common people" and spends so much time whining about the rich, probably shouldn't be flaunting her considerable wealth like that.
If she wants to wear these shoes, a less tone-deaf individual would wear them privately and not where thousands will see them.
Do you really want to go there? Are you going to hold the Trumps to the same standard when it comes the shoes they wear? I doubt they are buying their shoes at Walmarts. Mrs. Trump's clothing allowance alone would probably support a small country. Oh, I know. You're going to say that doesn't matter with the trump's because they don't care about the poor in this or any other country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top