Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-29-2016, 08:06 PM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,400,252 times
Reputation: 40736

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Hillary said.. and I quote

"is no classified material"

If there were 22 emails declared top secret, that would be a LIE.. Since top secret info is by design.. CLASSIFIED.
Not if they were classified AFTER they were sent, as has been reported.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-29-2016, 08:16 PM
 
Location: West Michigan
12,372 posts, read 9,314,559 times
Reputation: 7364
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
Not if they were classified AFTER they were sent, as has been reported.
Why is that such a hard concept to understand?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2016, 08:22 PM
 
3,770 posts, read 6,744,556 times
Reputation: 3019
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayland Woman View Post
Why is that such a hard concept to understand?
Um, I don't know. Do you think someone with as much political experience as Hillary, would have any idea that in a large volume of emails sent by a person in her position, that there would be several that would become classified? Are you saying she is stupid or just ignorant?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2016, 08:28 PM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 24 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,560 posts, read 16,548,014 times
Reputation: 6042
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Hillary said.. and I quote

"is no classified material"

If there were 22 emails declared top secret, that would be a LIE.. Since top secret info is by design.. CLASSIFIED.
Please, just stop. At this point, it just looks like you are trolling.


Hillary Clinton on Private Email:

Quote:
On Tuesday, Clinton maintained that she did not send or receive classified material on the account and reiterated she is “trying to be as transparent as possible†in her handling of the email controversy.
the link includes a video of the interview, with the words coming out of her mouth. i dont even know why you believed that quoting a half a sentence made your point when the second half completely discredits it.

again, when you do things like that, it looks like you are just baiting an argument that you knew you were wrong about and just wanted to keep the argument going.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2016, 08:57 PM
 
Location: In Transition
1,637 posts, read 1,910,217 times
Reputation: 931
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayland Woman View Post
Why is that such a hard concept to understand?
Because it's not true.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2016, 08:59 PM
 
Location: In Transition
1,637 posts, read 1,910,217 times
Reputation: 931
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
Please, just stop. At this point, it just looks like you are trolling.


Hillary Clinton on Private Email:



the link includes a video of the interview, with the words coming out of her mouth. i dont even know why you believed that quoting a half a sentence made your point when the second half completely discredits it.

again, when you do things like that, it looks like you are just baiting an argument that you knew you were wrong about and just wanted to keep the argument going.
Because it's not Clinton's word (as shaky as it is already) on if the emails are classified, it's government policy. That is independent of what Clinton says or her manager.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2016, 09:01 PM
 
Location: In Transition
1,637 posts, read 1,910,217 times
Reputation: 931
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
Not if they were classified AFTER they were sent, as has been reported.
Government and DOD policy dictates what you just said makes no sense whatsoever.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2016, 09:14 PM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 24 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,560 posts, read 16,548,014 times
Reputation: 6042
Quote:
Originally Posted by jkbatca View Post
Because it's not Clinton's word (as shaky as it is already) on if the emails are classified, it's government policy. That is independent of what Clinton says or her manager.
But that doesnt in anyway contradict what Clinton said.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2016, 09:33 PM
 
Location: In Transition
1,637 posts, read 1,910,217 times
Reputation: 931
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
But that doesnt in anyway contradict what Clinton said.
LOL here it comes. What difference does it make!

Nobody cares what she says, it's the investigators and the so-called Justice department which matters. She can tell her story to the court, if the so-called Justice dept. presses charges or the FBI quits sending notifications that it keeps finding illegal emails. One of the two things are going to happen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2016, 09:36 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
4,490 posts, read 3,931,395 times
Reputation: 14538
I think it's fair to say that if her last name was Smith or Jones or Petraeus (), she'd have been indicted by now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:51 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top