Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-29-2016, 04:30 PM
 
29,532 posts, read 22,769,333 times
Reputation: 48269

Advertisements

Officials say some emails too damaging to release. Whoops.

Will it affect her campaign?

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/apnews...194823520.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-29-2016, 04:33 PM
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,630 posts, read 16,616,922 times
Reputation: 6066
Quote:
Originally Posted by Suburban_Guy View Post
Officials say some emails too damaging to release. Whoops.

Will it affect her campaign?

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/apnews...194823520.html
Her argument has always been that she never sent or received emails labeled classified/secret. So no, it will just mean republicans will spend more time talking about it in their next debate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2016, 04:39 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,225,377 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
Her argument has always been that she never sent or received emails labeled classified/secret. So no, it will just mean republicans will spend more time talking about it in their next debate.
Translation, Democrats have no standards and will accept being lied to.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2016, 04:44 PM
 
Location: Florida
23,795 posts, read 13,304,274 times
Reputation: 19953
Yawn.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2016, 04:47 PM
 
34,300 posts, read 15,704,726 times
Reputation: 13053
So if we read them someone will hunt us down and kill us ? Or were the secrete agents already murdered when Hillary failed to protect them. Oh that's right nobody died. What was that guys name again ? Nobody !!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2016, 04:51 PM
 
Location: West Michigan
12,372 posts, read 9,333,496 times
Reputation: 7364
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enigma777 View Post
Yawn.
Yup, nothing suspicious at all about this "revelation" just days before the Iowa primary.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2016, 04:52 PM
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,630 posts, read 16,616,922 times
Reputation: 6066
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Translation, Democrats have no standards and will accept being lied to.
Fallacy on 2 levels.

#1, the article never says Hillary Clinton lied. thats the premise of your argument and it fails from the beginning

#2, you can believe a lie, but you cant knowingly accept one, But definition, once you know it is a lie, you are only accepting the concept of the subject.


But none of this matters, because this is a made up scandal, it isnt illegal to have a private server, there for Clinton did nothing wrong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2016, 04:54 PM
 
12,049 posts, read 6,599,985 times
Reputation: 13986
Her spokesman just said on CNN that it's merely a case of "over-classification run amok."
And Wolf refuses to ask him about the SAP emails or the cut and paste ones.

Last edited by mountainrose; 01-29-2016 at 05:35 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2016, 05:17 PM
 
16,376 posts, read 22,534,461 times
Reputation: 14398
It was reported today on CNN that ALL of these emails were also on the government's official non-classified email server also. Even if Hillary didn't have a private server, all these emails would still be sitting on a non-classified server.

They also reported that these emails weren't classified at the time they were sent. And there is question on whether they qualify to be classified even today after one agency upgraded them but other agencies said they shouldn't be classified.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2016, 05:31 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,225,377 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
Fallacy on 2 levels.

#1, the article never says Hillary Clinton lied. thats the premise of your argument and it fails from the beginning

#2, you can believe a lie, but you cant knowingly accept one, But definition, once you know it is a lie, you are only accepting the concept of the subject.


But none of this matters, because this is a made up scandal, it isnt illegal to have a private server, there for Clinton did nothing wrong.
Hillary said.. and I quote

"is no classified material"

If there were 22 emails declared top secret, that would be a LIE.. Since top secret info is by design.. CLASSIFIED.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:28 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top