Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-08-2016, 01:28 PM
 
Location: Kansas
25,962 posts, read 22,107,325 times
Reputation: 26691

Advertisements

I think this looks really promising when it comes to taking out Hillary. I have heard it in the media several times now:

Hillary Gets Guccifered - WSJ

I surely hope she gets "guccifered" really good!

I hope Bernie keeps his suit pressed and shoes shined, so he won't look shabby when he is nominated by the Democratic Party. Go Bernie, make the Democratic Party fair again!

"Reap what you have sown" Hillary!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-08-2016, 02:24 PM
 
34,300 posts, read 15,646,770 times
Reputation: 13053
“They got her on a Guccifer.” Is that like life support ? Lets call Jeb and see if we can unplug her and let her die.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2016, 02:30 PM
 
4,504 posts, read 3,030,193 times
Reputation: 9631
The hideous hag will continue to say there was nothing classified in her emails.


Since pretty much everything the SoS does is classified in one form or another, this begs the question: What the hell was she doing whilst taking a paycheck on the taxpayer's dollar? Sending love notes to the equally hideous Huma and creating cookie recipes?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2016, 02:45 PM
 
Location: United States
12,390 posts, read 7,095,135 times
Reputation: 6135
Quote:
Originally Posted by MyNameIsBellaMia View Post
The hideous hag will continue to say there was nothing classified in her emails.


Since pretty much everything the SoS does is classified in one form or another, this begs the question: What the hell was she doing whilst taking a paycheck on the taxpayer's dollar? Sending love notes to the equally hideous Huma and creating cookie recipes?
It has been confirmed by the intelligence agencies looking into Hillary's server that some of her emails were indeed classified at the time they were sent, or received. Of course that is not the least bit surprising being that there are 22 emails that have top secret information, including SAP information.

It's going to take one heck of a cover up to make this go away. Unfortunately the Obama administration is damn good at cover ups.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2016, 02:49 PM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,945,761 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by stburr91 View Post
It has been confirmed by the intelligence agencies looking into Hillary's server that some of her emails were indeed classified at the time they were sent, or received. Of course that is not the least bit surprising being that there are 22 emails that have top secret information, including SAP information.

It's going to take one heck of a cover up to make this go away. Unfortunately the Obama administration is damn good at cover ups.
Link?
This was published today:
FBI officials have said Clinton is not the target of the probe
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2016, 02:57 PM
 
Location: United States
12,390 posts, read 7,095,135 times
Reputation: 6135
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
No, FBI officials have never said Hillary wasn't the target of the investigation. That was the White House spokesman, and he was taken to task for saying that, because he, nor the president have briefed on the investigation.

From the article you posted.

Former officials and legal experts say the Democratic front-runner's testimony will likely be the final puzzle piece for federal prosecutors and FBI.

“Typically, the way we structured investigations when I was a federal prosecutor is that we would seek to interview the target last,” he said.



Let's put this "intent" nonsense to rest once and for all. Again, from your article.


“The extent to which the person intended to remove classified documents is irrelevant,” he said in an email to The Hill. “All that matters for strict legal purposes of culpability is whether the person, by virtue of their official position, came into possession of classified information and affirmatively removed the information to an unauthorized location (i.e., the private server).

“Whether the person knew or suspected the information was classified is irrelevant.”

Last edited by stburr91; 05-08-2016 at 03:09 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2016, 03:06 PM
 
Location: Kansas
25,962 posts, read 22,107,325 times
Reputation: 26691
This link has a good video:

Romanian hacker
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2016, 03:06 PM
 
4,078 posts, read 2,338,899 times
Reputation: 1395
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnywhereElse View Post
I think this looks really promising when it comes to taking out Hillary. I have heard it in the media several times now:

Hillary Gets Guccifered - WSJ

I surely hope she gets "guccifered" really good!

I hope Bernie keeps his suit pressed and shoes shined, so he won't look shabby when he is nominated by the Democratic Party. Go Bernie, make the Democratic Party fair again!

"Reap what you have sown" Hillary!
You're source is WSJ? The source every Trump follower swears is garbage and not worth a dime every time they publish something negative on Trump. All the sudden its trustworthy and believable when its negative about Hillary? Trump followers are classic comedy, such contradictory puppets lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2016, 03:10 PM
 
Location: United States
12,390 posts, read 7,095,135 times
Reputation: 6135
Quote:
Originally Posted by dexter75 View Post
You're source is WSJ? The source every Trump follower swears is garbage and not worth a dime every time they publish something negative on Trump. All the sudden its trustworthy and believable when its negative about Hillary? Trump followers are classic comedy, such contradictory puppets lol
OK, you pick the source you like Dexter, because this is being reported on many sources now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2016, 03:25 PM
 
4,078 posts, read 2,338,899 times
Reputation: 1395
Quote:
Originally Posted by stburr91 View Post
OK, you pick the source you like Dexter, because this is being reported on many sources now.
Thats not the point. The point is people who claim to be anti-establishment and anti-mainstream media are getting their news from the WALL STREET JOURNAL which is probably the biggest establishment and mainstream media source around. They are just so confused and contradictory, they dont know which way is up or down.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top