Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Out of the 55 women the NYT interviewed, they only cited 6.
The NY Times reporters did comment on this. They said that most of the women they interviewed were too afraid to have their names made public because Trump and his supporters are known for being extremely vicious toward dissenters.
I don't think this will make me not vote for Trump. But I watched Fox last night and she didn't say anything bad. Just behavior change toward women. Very general.
The NY Times reporters did comment on this. They said that most of the women they interviewed were too afraid to have their names made public because Trump and his supporters are known for being extremely vicious toward dissenters.
I don't think this will make me not vote for Trump. But I watched Fox last night and she didn't say anything bad. Just behavior change toward women. Very general.
The worst thing she said was that she was voting for Hillary and that Trump wasn't "presidential" material.
She had very little experience and Trump gave her major projects. Very ungrateful to do this!
Trumpy gave someone with little experience an important job? Are you sure? Because he keeps claiming he has superior management skills and he would have to be a fool to do that
So far, it seems like most of the women who worked for him are voting for Hillary. I don't know about the ones who dated him.
The other woman who worked for him (Louise Sunshine? I think that was her name) also said she was voting for Hillary.
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey
You also don`t know about the ones that worked for him since the Trump organization has more than 22,000 employees and you appear to have limited knowledge of 2.
Care to back up that "most" claim, or will you be honest enough to admit that you pulled it out of your ***?
Quote:
Originally Posted by UB50
She worked for him in the 1980s and she stayed for 18 years. Trump's organization was much smaller back in 1980. It didn't have 22,000 people in it. I doubt it had over 200, and that's being generous.
Is that clear now? Show me other women who worked for him in the 1980s who have been interviewed and I can change my mind but so far, the media has only interviewed a couple of them.
Well, the New York Times story means nothing, now that one of the women interviewed says she was misquoted.
But then she said she wasn't misquoted but the story was "spun" wrong. She couldn't identify any words she didn't say. The NYT stands by the story and I'm sure they recorded her words.
Trump shows vindictiveness over such petty things. Legally, he would never win a libel lawsuit against the NYT but he wants to file a lawsuit anyway. That's just stupid.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
