Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
These are three things that the Dems have been trying to get done over the last 3 years that the Republicans have blocked at every turn.
The only thing that the Republican/Democratic Party had been working on is more pension money for themselves, the best health insurance they can find for themselves, more bureaucratic jobs for their family in government, and securing their place on Wall Street once they leave D.C. Inc. Working together, on laws they really care about, they were enormously successful.
How can you look at his history of things like Trump U and the projects he's sold his name to then distanced himself from when they went bad and believe his actions will live up to his rhetoric?
How can you overlook Benghazi and state of America after 8 years of Mohammed Obama and his Corporate HO- Saudi brown-nosing Dingleberry Clinton and not know without a doubt that only the braindead would want more of THAT!
Trump is a nutcase. He will do absolutely NOTHING that he says he will do. Think about it. Trump has none of the political skill necessary to be the chief executive officer of the Republic. He claims that he would “declare war” on ISIS and “wipe out” the terror organization, but he does not comprehend how dangerous it is to exert physical military power in the real world. If Trump is elected as President, he will make such a fool out of himself in front of the world and America will become a laughingstock for the next 4 years.
Is it possible to be any more of a laughingstock than we have been for the last 8 yrs?
Right. While everyone is running around shouting "He could be a disaster in foreign policy", we already know for a fact that Hillary IS.
He certainly will. How anyone can see how blatantly corrupt the government has become and still vote for HRC is truly astonishing.
Hopefully more will start paying attention. The media are so pro Hillary and anti Trump, it is not even truthful to call them journalists. It is exactly like Trump has been saying. They are all fighting as hard as they can to keep the status quo, because the status quo has been a boon to them.
Here, here. Even if this is the only thing you can agree with Trump on, it is SO IMPORTANT that by itself it is worthy of supporting Trump with a great deal of passion.
Who is fear mongering now?
Can't be stressed enough that right there on the stage in front of all the RNC bigwigs he defied them all by being far more inclusive that they typically are. Probably stepped on some toes, but the ROOM was 100% behind him, as are most level headed conservatives, and I dare say level headed Americans of all party affiliation. While Trump has garnered the RNC nomination, he is in no way a Republican. Ivanka stated very plainly that she was not a D or an R at the very beginning of her speech. She said she votes for whoever she thinks will do the best job for her and her children.
Trump doubled down on this, and basically said "Here is what I will push for and work on" Don't let things on the RNC platform scare you away, because I am not interested in a lot of that garbage".
If you really believe all of that malarkey & that "level headed Republicans are behind him...", you ought to hear the reservations being expressed by a large portion of the Republicans in my office & what they have to say about him & his brand of "Republicanism". It ain't pretty & doesn't bode well for him in the election.
Status:
"Smartened up and walked away!"
(set 28 days ago)
11,792 posts, read 5,798,330 times
Reputation: 14221
Well the person has been reported that disagreed and sent the hateful comment by rating my post positively. I'd rather ignore people than fight with them - that is not a discussion.
Pretty much what has happened. The Democratic Party, by nominating Clinton, has become the party of Chappaqua and Wall Street.
Indeed. They should have nominated (has that happened yet?) a successful billionaire businessman like George Soros or Michael Bloomberg, eh? I don't follow this logic.
Status:
"Apparently the worst poster on CD"
(set 29 days ago)
27,651 posts, read 16,138,284 times
Reputation: 19074
Quote:
Originally Posted by atler8
Yes, and that's only the top of the iceberg as goes constructive things that would have benefitted our nation but which were blocked by the republicans.
Indeed. They should have nominated (has that happened yet?) a successful billionaire businessman like George Soros or Michael Bloomberg, eh? I don't follow this logic.
Mick
You don't follow it because you benefit from the Party of Wall Street (Party on Wall Street). You won't get it until your wiped out, deeply in debt, and without a job like so much of America. It takes pain to force change. Until then, Clinton of Wall Street will be a perfectly acceptable choice as she is with many of my progressive friends who benefit from corruption
If you really believe all of that malarkey & that "level headed Republicans are behind him...", you ought to hear the reservations being expressed by a large portion of the Republicans in my office & what they have to say about him & his brand of "Republicanism". It ain't pretty & doesn't bode well for him in the election.
Yeah, I know. He'll never last a month in the primaries right?
Just one more thing that "doesn't bode well for Trump". Never heard that one before.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.