Powell "rather not have to vote" for Hillary, greedy, non transformational husband (Colin Powell, polls)

[petch751]

NYT... “We are confirming that General Powell has been hacked and that they are his emails.

In 2014, Powell wrote that he "would rather not have to vote" for Hillary Clinton because of reasons that included a report her husband was "still dicking bimbos at home."

Guess Who Colin Powell Is Talking About: He's "Still Dicking Bimbos At Home" | Zero Hedge

[petch751]

[eddiehaskell]

LOL - the Clintons are the political gift that just keeps giving.

[petch751]

Don't forget "greedy, not transformational"

"A 70-year person with a long track record, unbridled ambition, greedy, not transformational, with a husband still dicking bimbos at home," he wrote.

[petch751]

Powell himself told BuzzFeed that he was "not denying it," although he had no further comment.

[WaldoKitty]

Truth told.

[t206]

Originally Posted by petch751

Don't forget "greedy, not transformational"

"A 70-year person with a long track record, unbridled ambition, greedy, not transformational, with a husband still dicking bimbos at home," he wrote.

Just more of the "deplorables" I suppose.

[Seagrape Grove]

Originally Posted by t206

Just more of the "deplorables" I suppose.

More like "abhorables".

[eddiehaskell]

I guess the Powell endorsement is off the table.

Dems nominated a greedy, non-transformational, insulting (deplorables), lying, unhealthy woman with a serial cheater/rapist for a husband. Good grief. Reality really is stranger than fiction.

Any more slipping in the polls and the calls for replacement will start getting really loud. And to think...we haven't even heard from Assange yet.

[t206]

Originally Posted by eddiehaskell

I guess the Powell endorsement is off the table.

Dems nominated a greedy, non-transformational, insulting (deplorables), lying, unhealthy woman with a serial cheater/rapist for a husband. Good grief. Reality really is stranger than fiction.

Any more slipping in the polls and the calls for replacement will start getting really loud. And to think...we haven't even heard from Assange yet.

Is it too late to get him into the debates? As a moderator or a candidate? I'm ok with either option. Imagine even just a "viewer" question from him. People would loose it if his face popped up on the camera with a question.