Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Ahem, that "article" is published in the Observer. The Observer is published by Jared Kushner, who is married to Ivanka Trump, which makes the publisher Donald Trump's son-in-law. Nuff said about the Observer "Exclusive."
Did it happen or not???? I don't care who the messenger is. I care if it happened or not. With Hillary anything is possible. Why? Because she has been caught lying so many times. Like being flat busted broke when they left the white house, or being under sniper fire. Even lying about what the FBI said.... The FBI didn't clear her of breaking laws, the FBI chose not to prosecute. There is a big difference.
Did it happen or not???? I don't care who the messenger is. I care if it happened or not. With Hillary anything is possible. Why? Because she has been caught lying so many times. Like being flat busted broke when they left the white house, or being under sniper fire. Even lying about what the FBI said.... The FBI didn't clear her of breaking laws, the FBI chose not to prosecute. There is a big difference.
What does that have anything to do with credit card charges?
As I previously stated, people using stolen credit cards on the Clinton website to make donations isn't something that the Clinton Campaign is culpable. Often, credit card thieves make small purchases on sites to test that the card is valid. In any case, the banks refund the money and chargeback the vendor. (Thank you job-killing federal regulations.)
I am sure the same thing is happening on the Trump website. We just aren't hearing about it.
This is really a non-story.
why are you tossing out red herrings and non-sequiturs?
There is no accusation that stolen credit cards were used.
there is no accusation that banks aren't refunding in violation of the law.
IN fact, the bank is clearly refunding quickly. The article clearly states the issue is that the campaign isn't doing anything after up to 50 calls. THEN the customers are going to the bank for resolution and getting it FROM THE BANK.
But NOT FROM HILLARY campaign.
this isn't about stolen credit cards.
Its about a pattern of abuse of the poor. Its about fraud by Hillary and her campaign. Its about a willful disregard for the law. and CONTEMPT for the American people.
Either provide a counterpoint or go away. this nonsense you are spouting has nothing to do with facts at hand.
Please cite the statute that was broken (a per-requisite for felony charges.)
The article itself points out, "This is theft, fraud or wire fraud—it’s a federal crime!”
what else do you need?
you want someone to provide you the statute in the actual code? LOL.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
