Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-11-2016, 08:32 AM
 
Location: LEAVING CD
22,974 posts, read 27,016,029 times
Reputation: 15645

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by carterstamp View Post
Bill "Let's go to Chinatown and tape a really racist comedy sketch, it'll be fun" O'Reilly? That Bill O'?
Please show where it was "racist"? I'll wait...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-11-2016, 08:32 AM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 15,114,106 times
Reputation: 8527
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimj View Post
Please show where it was "racist"? I'll wait...
Here ya go. Enjoy.

http://www.esquire.com/news-politics...inatown-video/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2016, 08:32 AM
 
Location: S.E. US
13,163 posts, read 1,698,118 times
Reputation: 5132
The media in collusion to destroy Trump is not unlike the Democrat party in collusion to destroy Bernie.

Birds of a feather. They are more interested in destroying people than in building the country. People who voted for Bernie are dissed. Trump supporters are put in a basket of deplorables. And all that while they charge conservatives with being 'divisive'.

Those who hold opposing views need to be silenced, destroyed, degraded. That is the left's standard operating procedure. They can't oppose with facts, so they smear.

And Hillary, being a split personality (both a 'personal and public' Hillary), hasn't assured us how she plans to bring transparency to THAT.

If that were Trump who had said that, we'd be hearing nothing but how Trump is duplicitous. Since it's Hillary, there's not a mention.

Funny, isn't it. But it's not funny. The collusion is downright irresponsible. It denies YOUR right to make a free will choice of candidates based on the facts and instead manipulates you with mass propaganda.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2016, 08:34 AM
 
Location: LEAVING CD
22,974 posts, read 27,016,029 times
Reputation: 15645
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unsettomati View Post
Imagine how many more elections Republicans would win if they spent their time introspectively examining their own electoral failures and working to correct them, rather than devoting their energies to whining about how everyone but themselves are to blame for their own failings?

The 'Party of Personal Responsibility'?
And how many will bother to read the Wikileaks of what THEIR party has been up to? I'd bet little to none as it might just take the luster off.
Laa laaa laaaa (hands over ears)
Hear no evil,see no evil...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2016, 08:35 AM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 15,114,106 times
Reputation: 8527
Quote:
Originally Posted by southward bound View Post
The media in collusion to destroy Trump is not unlike the Democrat party in collusion to destroy Bernie.

Birds of a feather. They are more interested in destroying people than in building the country. People who voted for Bernie are dissed. Trump supporters are put in a basket of deplorables. And all that while they charge conservatives with being 'divisive'.

Those who hold opposing views need to be silenced, destroyed, degraded. That is the left's standard operating procedure. They can't oppose with facts, so they smear.

And Hillary, being a split personality (both a 'personal and public' Hillary), hasn't assured us how she plans to bring transparency to THAT.

If that were Trump who had said that, we'd be hearing nothing but how Trump is duplicitous. Since it's Hillary, there's not a mention.

Funny, isn't it. But it's not funny. The collusion is downright irresponsible. It denies YOUR right to make a free will choice of candidates based on the facts and instead manipulates you with mass propaganda.
Trumps ability to spew crapola every time he opens his mouth is not collusion. Trump's problems are caused by his inability to control himself.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2016, 08:38 AM
 
Location: LEAVING CD
22,974 posts, read 27,016,029 times
Reputation: 15645
Quote:
Originally Posted by carterstamp View Post
I saw the original broadcast. He's usually humorous but this time? Poor taste? Yep. Poor attempt at humor? Yep.

But where was it RACIST? Specifics please. still waiting...

I guess Jesse could fall back on what the left always does when they're caught doing something totally tasteless and crass, using the excuse "but I'm a comedian"!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2016, 08:46 AM
 
Location: S.E. US
13,163 posts, read 1,698,118 times
Reputation: 5132
Quote:
Originally Posted by carterstamp View Post
Trumps ability to spew crapola every time he opens his mouth is not collusion. Trump's problems are caused by his inability to control himself.
The topic is about media collusion. Please try stay focused.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2016, 08:46 AM
 
Location: LEAVING CD
22,974 posts, read 27,016,029 times
Reputation: 15645
Thumbs down Yeah, there's no collusion between Media/HRC campaign.

So, no collusion between the media and HRC campaign? Ok... Sure...

From Wikileaks dump today:

From:jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com
To: gruncom@aol.com, bfallon@hillaryclinton.com, john@algpolling.com, balcantara@hillaryclinton.com
Date: 2015-10-04 17:35
Subject: RE: BS and guns


Being added today. Plus Betsaida who is collecting. Edits are do at 5 pm
if any other commetns.

*From:* Mandy Grunwald [mailto:gruncom@aol.com]
*Sent:* Sunday, October 4, 2015 3:30 PM
*To:* bfallon@hillaryclinton.com; john@algpolling.com
*Cc:* kofferdahl@hillaryclinton.com; arenteria@hillaryclinton.com;
caitlin@grunwald-communications.com; creynolds@hillaryclinton.com;
dschwerin@hillaryclinton.com; david@db-research.com; ellen.esterhay@gmmb.com;
ha16@hillaryclinton.com; jsullivan@hillaryclinton.com;
jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com; Jim.Margolis@gmmb.com; jbenenson@bsgco.com;
jp66@hillaryclinton.com; john.podesta@gmail.com; kfinney@hillaryclinton.com;
kschake@hillaryclinton.com; mmarshall@hillaryclinton.com;
mharris@hillaryclinton.com; mvlacich@hillaryclinton.com;
mfisher@hillaryclinton.com; Mona@algpolling.com; oshur@hillaryclinton.com;
re47@hillaryclinton.com; slatham@hillaryclinton.com; sbay@hillaryclinton.com;
scurrie@bsgco.com; tgoff@hillaryclinton.com; tcarrk@hillaryclinton.com;
vanand@hillaryclinton.com; hstone@hillaryclinton.com
*Subject:* Re: BS and guns


There have been a couple stories in the last few days about past HRC
positions on gun control, like this one in Buzzfeed about HRC OPPOSING
federal gun control standards and arguing (as on minimum wage now) that
states had different needs.

http://www.buzzfeed.com/christopherm...ent#.nfQAQdNqz

I also saw something about her supporting a 25% tax on gun sales back in
1993.

I didn't see q and a on either of these in the briefing.

*Mandy Grunwald*

*Grunwald Communications*

*202 973-9400*

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Fallon <bfallon@hillaryclinton.com>
To: John Anzalone <john@algpolling.com>
Cc: Kate Offerdahl <kofferdahl@hillaryclinton.com>; Amanda Renteria <
arenteria@hillaryclinton.com>; caitlin <caitlin@grunwald-communications.com>;
Christina Reynolds <creynolds@hillaryclinton.com>; Dan Schwerin <
dschwerin@hillaryclinton.com>; David Binder <david@db-research.com>; Ellen
Esterhay <ellen.esterhay@gmmb.com>; Huma Abedin <ha16@hillaryclinton.com>;
Jake Sullivan <jsullivan@hillaryclinton.com>; Jennifer Palmieri <
jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com>; Jim Margolis <Jim.Margolis@gmmb.com>; Joel
Benenson <jbenenson@bsgco.com>; John Podesta <jp66@hillaryclinton.com>;
John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com>; Karen Finney <
kfinney@hillaryclinton.com>; Kristina Schake <kschake@hillaryclinton.com>;
Mandy Grunwald <gruncom@aol.com>; Marlon Marshall <
mmarshall@hillaryclinton.com>; Maya Harris <mharris@hillaryclinton.com>;
Mike Vlacich <mvlacich@hillaryclinton.com>; Milia Fisher <
mfisher@hillaryclinton.com>; Mona Thinavongsa <Mona@algpolling.com>; Oren
Shur <oshur@hillaryclinton.com>; Robby Mook <re47@hillaryclinton.com>; Sara
Latham <slatham@hillaryclinton.com>; Sawsan Bay <sbay@hillaryclinton.com>;
Shannon Currie <scurrie@bsgco.com>; Teddy Goff <tgoff@hillaryclinton.com>;
Tony Carrk <tcarrk@hillaryclinton.com>; Varun Anand <
vanand@hillaryclinton.com>; Heather Stone <hstone@hillaryclinton.com>
Sent: Sun, Oct 4, 2015 3:24 pm
Subject: Re: BS and guns

Circling back around on guns as a follow up to the Friday morning
discussion: the Today show has indicated they definitely plan to ask bout
guns, and so to have the discussion be more of a news event than her
previous times discussing guns, we are going to background reporters
tonight on a few of the specific proposals she would support as President
-
universal background checks of course, but also closing the gun show
loophole by executive order and imposing manufacturer liability.

On Friday, October 2, 2015, John Anzalone <john@algpolling.com> wrote:

Here is the BS interview last night on tragedy/guns last night I referenced
on the call where he punts on gun manufacturer liability. He also keeps
using the term “sensible” gun legislation...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2016, 08:50 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,400,252 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by carterstamp View Post
Trumps ability to spew crapola every time he opens his mouth is not collusion. Trump's problems are caused by his inability to control himself.
'Personal responsibility' seems to have been blown away from the GOP's platform like a leaf in a hurricane.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2016, 08:52 AM
 
Location: S.E. US
13,163 posts, read 1,698,118 times
Reputation: 5132
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
'Personal responsibility' seems to have been blown away from the GOP's platform like a leaf in a hurricane.
Show us where it is in the Dem platform and I'll consider your comment with an open mind.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:43 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top