Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-12-2016, 03:18 PM
 
1,432 posts, read 1,092,091 times
Reputation: 333

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveinMtAiry View Post
I love how the Trump guys loved to point to the polls when he was doing well, then they dismiss them when they turn ugly. You aren't fooling anyone.
Did I say I was a Trump guy. I would rather have a care taker govt., fire every single politician and start over. Trump is least likely to raise my taxes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-12-2016, 03:19 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,210,872 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by HeyJude514 View Post
How about when they all are saying the same thing?

RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - General Election: Trump vs. Clinton

Are they all wrong?
Are they all wrong? I do not know but I know the polls were predicting a loss for Brexit until the results came in. The main proponents even conceded a loss that morning.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2016, 03:21 PM
 
Location: Type 0.73 Kardashev
11,110 posts, read 9,817,167 times
Reputation: 40166
Quote:
Originally Posted by MyNameIsBellaMia View Post
And someone is too dumb to notice the dates. Noteworthy is how the dates polled always differ from the dates published.

One would think it's not rocket science, but for Hillbots, pretty much everything is rocket science.
Sure.

If you're too dumb to realize that it takes a day or two for the dozens of people working the phones to do that, then compile all their collected data and send it up the pipeline to those who assemble the data and write up a paper - and the release is often dozens of pages long - proof-check it all multiple times, and then send it to media outlets, who then publish it.

Then it's 'noteworthy'. But only then.

Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Are they all wrong? I do not know but I know the polls were predicting a loss for Brexit until the results came in. The main proponents even conceded a loss that morning.
Oh, you know that, do you?

The polls from the last 10 days of the campaign:

Quote:
Date - Leave - Remain - Undecided - Pollster - Type
22 Jun 2016 45 45 10 YouGov online
22 Jun 2016 45 44 11 Opinium online
22 Jun 2016 43 41 16 TNS online
22 Jun 2016 42 48 11 ComRes phone
20 Jun 2016 44 45 11 Survation phone
19 Jun 2016 44 42 13 YouGov online
19 Jun 2016 47 53 2 ORB phone
18 Jun 2016 42 45 13 Survation phone
17 Jun 2016 43 44 13 YouGov online
17 Jun 2016 44 44 12 Opinium online
16 Jun 2016 44 42 14 YouGov online
15 Jun 2016 45 42 13 Survation phone
15 Jun 2016 43 46 11 BMG phone
15 Jun 2016 51 41 9 BMG online
14 Jun 2016 49 43 8 Ipsos Mori phone
13 Jun 2016 45 46 9 ComRes phone
13 Jun 2016 49 44 7 ICM online
13 Jun 2016 50 45 6 ICM phone
13 Jun 2016 46 39 15 YouGov online
13 Jun 2016 47 40 13 TNS online
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-...endum-36271589

20 polls
11 for LEAVE
7 for REMAIN
2 TIED

The majority of the polls called the outcome correctly. Of the five biggest spreads, four were for LEAVE (10%, 7%, 7%, 6%) and only one was for REMAIN (6%). Aggregated, all these polls collectively show LEAVE over REMAIN by 1.5%. In other words, the Brexit polling did, in fact, correctly predict the result. And given that the final result was LEAVE by 3.8%, the differential is 2.3%, well within the MoE of virtually any poll. So not only did the pre-Brexit polling hit the result, it got within the MoE on the numbers.

God, the lengths people will go to in order to ignore things that make them unhappy...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2016, 03:22 PM
mlb
 
Location: North Monterey County
4,971 posts, read 4,452,471 times
Reputation: 7903
LA Times Polls Distortion

The USC Dornslife/LA Times poll isn't a poll, and is distorting the face of the election
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2016, 03:23 PM
 
Location: 500 miles from home
33,942 posts, read 22,532,112 times
Reputation: 25816
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wittgenstein's Ghost View Post
The Real Clear Politics Average has Clinton at +6.2 in the head-to-head with Trump right now, and if you take out the LA Times poll (which has them tied), that becomes a solid +7.

It appears that even the most devout Trump supporters no longer have even the inaccurate polls on their side. Giving Trump a 6 or 7 point boost due to bad methodology still isn't enough to give him a lead.

It's funny to think back to all of the people I've heard say it would be a Trump landslide and the talk of a "silent majority." Trump will almost certainly finish with the lowest percentage of votes since John Q Adams in 1824 (30.91%)! And to think people have raved about how Trump has been so popular....


RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - General Election: Trump vs. Clinton
Hmmm.


Maybe that is why we're playing Where's Waldo right now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2016, 03:24 PM
 
2,630 posts, read 1,455,899 times
Reputation: 3595
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveinMtAiry View Post
I love how the Trump guys loved to point to the polls when he was doing well, then they dismiss them when they turn ugly. You aren't fooling anyone.
Ah, where is WaldoKitty? This is Yuge. Yeah Yuge! Trump supporters only like certain polls.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2016, 03:26 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,210,872 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unsettomati View Post
Sure.

If you're too dumb to realize that it takes a day or two for the dozens of people working the phones to do that, then compile all their collected data and send it up the pipeline to those who assemble the data and write up a paper - and the release is often dozens of pages long - proof-check it all multiple times, and then send it to media outlets, who then publish it.

Then it's 'noteworthy'. But only then.



Oh, you know that, do you?

The polls from the last 10 days of the campaign:


EU referendum poll tracker - BBC News

20 polls
11 for LEAVE
7 for REMAIN
2 TIED

The majority of the polls called the outcome correctly. Of the five biggest spreads, four were for LEAVE (10%, 7%, 7%, 6%) and only one was for REMAIN (6%). Aggregated, all these polls collectively show LEAVE over REMAIN by 1.5%. In other words, the Brexit polling did, in fact, correctly predict the result. And given that the final result was LEAVE by 3.8%, the differential is 2.3%, well within the MoE of virtually any poll. So not only did the pre-Brexit polling hit the result, it got within the MoE on the numbers.

God, the lengths people will go to in order to ignore things that make them unhappy...
So what are you saying here? Most of them were wrong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2016, 03:28 PM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
9,828 posts, read 9,419,527 times
Reputation: 6288
Quote:
Originally Posted by Horizonite View Post
I would much rather count myself as a hidden Trump voter than a boastful supporter of a career criminal.
You're a supporter of election day roadkill.

Enjoy!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2016, 04:15 PM
 
Location: Caverns measureless to man...
7,588 posts, read 6,630,428 times
Reputation: 17966
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
So what are you saying here? Most of them were wrong.
20 polls.

11 leave.

7 remain.

2 tied.

Most of them were right.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2016, 04:19 PM
 
Location: Twin Falls Idaho
4,996 posts, read 2,445,794 times
Reputation: 2540
Quote:
Originally Posted by Secchamps98 View Post
Probably b/c we have gotten rid of land lines, and don't accept calls on our cell from unknown callers.
Perhaps they should adjust the frequency on the Tin-foil hat...tune in to pollsters......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:35 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top