Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If Wikileaks was actually a public information service and not the tool of a couple of jerks with an agenda, everything they had would have been released at once long ago. Period.
But it's Assange and Putin/criminal hackers trying to control the election and take their time doctoring documents. Intelligence officials have told media sources that the plan is to leak stuff slowly and then put out some big lies before the election when there is not enough time to prove they are fake.
So good luck Trump fans--maybe something will come out that wins the election for Trump, since he apparently cannot get enough people to vote for him based on issues.
Women who were appalled by Trump's crude debate stunt are now coming out of the woodwork and flooding media outlets with stories of how he victimized them with his crude and inappropriate behavior, so may the best videos/stories win.
Frankly, I've already voted and couldn't care less what John Podesta or any other staffers wrote in an email.
Maybe one's dirt negates the other's and the voters pick based on policy. If it comes down to corrupt vs sleaze, maybe policy will matter this go around.
Makes me worry a bit though that they are planning to wait until November. I think that is cutting it a bit too close.
Maybe they want the Clinton camp and the media to shoot all their bullets first so there is nothing to distract CNN and others from actually spending time talking about it.
yes, a fine line when to release them. In the OP's screen shot .jpg, it mentions they are going to be released in batches of 4-5 sets, by 11/1 so the dems "cannot have time to replace" her.
This release is either a bluff or a major/serious event that is going to hit the fan in an ugly way. Given this is anonymous, they mean business, and I'd guess this isn't bluffing at all.
Buckle your seat belts I'd say. This could get very, very ugly if true if they have what they say they have/are suggesting.
I voted by mail yesterday. There was only one misogynist ticket on the ballot, and it didn't include Julian Assange or Bill Clinton. Podesta wasn't listed either.
You know HRC is getting votes every day with early voting. Think the hackers would know that and release the damning information earlier. They are waiting too late, the election might have already been decided
Status:
"Smartened up and walked away!"
(set 27 days ago)
11,788 posts, read 5,798,330 times
Reputation: 14213
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enigma777
If Wikileaks was actually a public information service and not the tool of a couple of jerks with an agenda, everything they had would have been released at once long ago. Period.
But it's Assange and Putin/criminal hackers trying to control the election and take their time doctoring documents. Intelligence officials have told media sources that the plan is to leak stuff slowly and then put out some big lies before the election when there is not enough time to prove they are fake.
So good luck Trump fans--maybe something will come out that wins the election for Trump, since he apparently cannot get enough people to vote for him based on issues.
Women who were appalled by Trump's crude debate stunt are now coming out of the woodwork and flooding media outlets with stories of how he victimized them with his crude and inappropriate behavior, so may the best videos/stories win.
Frankly, I've already voted and couldn't care less what John Podesta or any other staffers wrote in an email.
Quit drinking the KoolAid - it wasn't Russian hackers - some of the info was leaked by the gov't employee shot in the back of the head - the rest and many to come are being released by Anonymous which are a group of hackers from all over the globe. Your Russian hacker story is fabrication right out of the Hillary campaign but keep running with it as the media - including Fox is running with it. TG the independent media releases and talks about things or we'd be as brainwashed as the Hillary supporters.
I'm interested to see how many right wing conspiracy nuts acting out of desperation can take words out of context to try and spin an election for a man circling the drain. I'm also interested to watch Russia manipulate the very people who wrap themselves in the flag and proclaim to be patriots. It's enlightening.
If Wikileaks was actually a public information service and not the tool of a couple of jerks with an agenda, everything they had would have been released at once long ago. Period.
If the MSM was actually a public information service and not the tool of a couple of jerks with an agenda, everything they had would have been released at once long ago.....and fairly covered....on both Hillary AND Trump. Period.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
