Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-17-2016, 05:47 AM
 
Location: north central Ohio
8,665 posts, read 5,861,042 times
Reputation: 5201

Advertisements

WASHINGTON — Hacked emails released in daily dispatches over the weekend by the WikiLeaks group showed Hillary Clinton's campaign staff worried about a response to the gay community's backlash over a comment concerning former first lady Nancy Reagan and AIDS. Also among the documents are transcripts of Clinton speeches and question-and-answer sessions that Goldman Sachs hosted in 2013, appearances for which she received hundreds of thousands of dollars.



Among the revelations from Podesta's hacked emails:
RESPONSE TO BACKLASH FOR PRAISING NANCY REAGAN ON AIDS
Hillary Clinton's aides fretted over how to respond to backlash from the LGBT community after Clinton lauded Nancy Reagan for starting a "national conversation" about AIDS in the 1980s, emails released Sunday show.
Activists blame President Ronald Reagan for what they view as a devastatingly slow response to the AIDS crisis.
Clinton immediately tweeted an apology after her initial remarks last March. But her aides felt the LGBT community was unsatisfied and agreed to release a more detailed response.
"I don't want this to fester," wrote Clinton's campaign's LGBT outreach director, Dominic Lowell.
An initial draft of Clinton's statement began by stating: "I made a mistake." The line was changed to "I said something inaccurate" with the phrase "I made a mistake, plain and simple" added later.
___
WALL STREET SPEECHES
Hillary Clinton generally avoided direct criticism of Wall Street as she examined the causes and responses to the financial meltdown during a series of paid speeches to Goldman Sachs, according to transcripts disclosed by WikiLeaks.
Three transcripts released Saturday did not contain any new bombshells showing she was unduly influenced by contributions from the banking industry, as her primary rival Bernie Sanders had suggested. Still, her soft-handed approach in the speeches was likely to act as a reminder to liberals in the party of their concerns that the Democratic presidential nominee is too close to Wall Street to be an effective check on its excesses if elected.
Clinton's campaign neither confirmed nor denied that the speech transcripts and leaked Podesta emails are authentic, but there have been no indications that they were doctored before being released.
Emails show Clinton's response to LGBT backlash


I L-O-V-E WikiLeaks!♥♥♥ The only source with Edward Snowden.... shining any light on the dirty deeds/corruption in U.S. politics/government!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-17-2016, 06:00 AM
 
1,504 posts, read 853,578 times
Reputation: 1372
I remember being involved in a prolonged litigation...that went to the court of appeal...I found inconsistent facts regarding the judges ruling...When the court of appeal was challenged in this respect their answer to the mess was "The presiding judge MIS-SPOKE."

This is like Clintons apology and so called correction....I would say if someone "mis-spoke" then surely they MIS-THOUGHT....

Perhaps Clinton's brain was mis-thinking...or in the alternative...mis-leading.

Here is the point...If leader is to LEAD - they must never MIS-lead.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2016, 06:04 AM
 
6,394 posts, read 4,125,336 times
Reputation: 8253
I don't get it. Where is the controversy?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2016, 06:19 AM
 
Location: Big Island of Hawaii & HOT BuOYS Sailing Vessel
5,277 posts, read 2,808,493 times
Reputation: 1932
Again nothing of interest.

I am beginning to think Clinton didn't trust emails for the really important topics like:

Just how many people have I killed so far?

Where should I invest that $6 trillion dollars I stole?

What gift is appropriate for Bill's 72nd mistress?

What is best treatment for advanced Parkinson's?

Who should sit next to Trump during my funeral next month?
Should I be buried in a pants suit or dress?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2016, 12:24 PM
 
6,394 posts, read 4,125,336 times
Reputation: 8253
The real question is do Trumpies actually read these emails first before posting them here and declare that this is a huge controversy and is the email to bring down Clinton?

Take this thread for example. There's no controversy here. And yet the OP sounds like this is it the election is over because of this email. What a joke!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2016, 12:30 PM
 
47,020 posts, read 26,085,167 times
Reputation: 29502
No habla wingnut. Can someone tell me the outrageous bit here?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2016, 12:35 PM
 
Location: Big Island of Hawaii & HOT BuOYS Sailing Vessel
5,277 posts, read 2,808,493 times
Reputation: 1932
This is so controversial!

Stop the Press!

Everyone vote for Trump!

Secret discussion proves Clinton is sensitive to historical issues and minority groups.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2016, 01:50 PM
 
13,711 posts, read 9,253,304 times
Reputation: 9845
Quote:
Originally Posted by i_love_autumn View Post
WASHINGTON — Hacked emails released in daily dispatches over the weekend by the WikiLeaks group showed Hillary Clinton's campaign staff worried about a response to the gay community's backlash over a comment concerning former first lady Nancy Reagan and AIDS. Also among the documents are transcripts of Clinton speeches and question-and-answer sessions that Goldman Sachs hosted in 2013, appearances for which she received hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Wow, you mean the leaked emails tell us things we already know?!

No. Way. !

.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:39 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top