Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 10-08-2016, 07:36 PM
 
Location: Type 0.73 Kardashev
11,110 posts, read 9,821,329 times
Reputation: 40166

Advertisements

Unless Donald Trump drops out in the very near future - like, say, the next 72 hours - he will carry some states, thereby earning some Electoral College votes. Of course, only those chugging the orange-flavored Kool-Aid straight from the pitcher realize that he will lose, and lose badly. But given that it's pretty clear that he isn't dropping out, he'll win some electors.

And some will refuse to vote for him.

Only a small percentage of electors break ranks and do not support the candidate to which they are pledged.

2004 - A John Kerry elector instead cast their Presidential vote for John Edwards.
2000 - An Al Gore elector turned in a blank ballot, voting for no one.
1988 - A Michael Dukakis elector instead cast their Presidential vote for Lloyd Bentsen.
1976 - A Gerald Ford elector instead cast their Presidential vote for Ronald Reagan.
1972 - A Richard Nixon elector instead cast their Presidential vote for the Libertarian Party candidate.

So this happens once or twice a decade, out of more than 1000 Electoral College votes cast every ten years.

Back to my prediction:
This year, there were be multiple Trump electors who vote for someone else. Pence. Cruz. Johnson. McMullin. Others.

 
Old 12-19-2016, 07:44 PM
 
Location: Virginia
1,743 posts, read 992,793 times
Reputation: 1768
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unsettomati View Post
Unless Donald Trump drops out in the very near future - like, say, the next 72 hours - he will carry some states, thereby earning some Electoral College votes. Of course, only those chugging the orange-flavored Kool-Aid straight from the pitcher realize that he will lose, and lose badly. But given that it's pretty clear that he isn't dropping out, he'll win some electors.

And some will refuse to vote for him.

Back to my prediction:
This year, there were be multiple Trump electors who vote for someone else. Pence. Cruz. Johnson. McMullin. Others.
LOL

A faithful electorate would have given Trump a 1.32 advantage over Clinton.

Well, it looks like The Democrat Thug Party and its threats improved Trump’s win with a 1.34 advantage.

304 to 227

Hillary has indeed made history ... again!

How's your Kool-Aid tasting?
 
Old 12-19-2016, 07:47 PM
 
Location: Minnesota
1,548 posts, read 913,991 times
Reputation: 1413
How'd that work out for ya, buddy?
 
Old 12-19-2016, 07:50 PM
 
Location: Virginia
1,743 posts, read 992,793 times
Reputation: 1768
Quote:
Originally Posted by blanker View Post
How'd that work out for ya, buddy?
My guess?

Not as expected?
 
Old 12-19-2016, 07:56 PM
 
Location: Minnesota
1,548 posts, read 913,991 times
Reputation: 1413
Quote:
Originally Posted by claymoore View Post
My guess?

Not as expected?
Clearly!
 
Old 12-19-2016, 08:17 PM
 
33,316 posts, read 12,546,342 times
Reputation: 14946
Quote:
Originally Posted by claymoore View Post
LOL

A faithful electorate would have given Trump a 1.32 advantage over Clinton.

Well, it looks like The Democrat Thug Party and its threats improved Trump’s win with a 1.34 advantage.

304 to 227

Hillary has indeed made history ... again!

How's your Kool-Aid tasting?


Martin Sheen and his gang having to watch Hillary lose more votes to faithless electors than Trump did.....priceless .

I wonder if the total number of different people getting at least one vote from an elector set a record?
 
Old 12-19-2016, 08:18 PM
 
529 posts, read 370,172 times
Reputation: 581
Well at least his thread title was correct.

Hillary broke some records in this regard.

Kudos for knowing there'd be a LOT of faithless electors.

Too bad your Hillary colored glasses had you confused as to which candidate would bring out so many of the faithless against them.
 
Old 12-19-2016, 08:32 PM
 
8,275 posts, read 7,952,048 times
Reputation: 12122
This dude was the reverse Nostradamus of predictions. Everything he predicted turned out the opposite.
 
Old 12-19-2016, 08:39 PM
 
Location: Chicago Area
12,687 posts, read 6,739,500 times
Reputation: 6594
Eight faithless electors -- two of them Dems who were slapped back into line and forced to vote for Hillary. That's certainly the biggest faithless elector run in over 100 years!
 
Old 12-19-2016, 08:44 PM
 
Location: Free From The Oppressive State
30,267 posts, read 23,751,941 times
Reputation: 38689
Prediction: Dems will continue to fail in their predictions.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TZ-FUptkUNY
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:19 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top