Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-05-2008, 11:50 AM
BVH BVH started this thread
 
Location: Pennsylvania
944 posts, read 606,134 times
Reputation: 79

Advertisements

I am absolutely in favor of full disclosure from all candidates on their financial dealings. I think Hillary's latest tax returns ought to be released and added to the other 15 or so years of her tax returns that are a matter of public record.

Here are the questions for Obama to answer regarding his connections to TonyRezko, an indicted felon on trial facing charges of political corruption, amongst others:

1. Will Sen. Obama release all documents related to his relationship with Tony Rezko, including all documents related to his controversial land transaction?

2. When, specifically, did Sen. Obama become aware of Mr. Rezko's legal problems?

3. Sen. Obama has returned money from several individuals who are publicly associated with Mr. Rezko. How much money did Mr. Rezko bundle for Sen. Obama's campaigns in total, including people who are not business associates of Mr. Rezko? How many fundraisers did Mr. Rezko hold for Sen. Obama? Has there been an internal investigation to determine how many straw donors Mr. Rezko used to funnel money to Sen. Obama?

4. Much of the upcoming trial involves Mr. Rezko's efforts to control state boards as a means to defraud the state government. Have Sen. Obama and Mr. Rezko ever communicated about potential appointments to Illinois boards and commissions? It's been publicly reported that Sen. Obama lobbied these same state boards to secure contracts for campaign donors. Did Sen. Obama ever confer with Mr. Rezko concerning how to successfully lobby state boards?

5. The New York Times reported that Sen. Obama attended a business meeting on behalf of Mr. Rezko to impress potential investors for his business schemes. How many events did Sen. Obama attend on behalf of Mr. Rezko to impress investors? What was his role? Why did Sen. Obama agree to attend?

6. How many times did Senator Obama visit Tony Rezko's house? What were the purpose of these visits?

7. Did Sen. Obama intercede on behalf of Mr. Rezko in any governmental capacity?

The Fact Hub (broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-05-2008, 11:57 AM
 
Location: Washington state
7,211 posts, read 9,433,675 times
Reputation: 1895
Here's an answer for you:The Raw Story | NBC confronts Hillary with 'slum lord' photo
The Swamp: Photo surfaces of Hillary Clinton and Tony Rezko
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2008, 11:58 AM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,660 posts, read 67,548,962 times
Reputation: 21249
Tit for tat.

This is what we've become. Get real people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2008, 12:01 PM
 
Location: Charlotte
12,642 posts, read 15,602,495 times
Reputation: 1680
Quote:
Originally Posted by BVH View Post
I am absolutely in favor of full disclosure from all candidates on their financial dealings. I think Hillary's latest tax returns ought to be released and added to the other 15 or so years of her tax returns that are a matter of public record.

Here are the questions for Obama to answer regarding his connections to TonyRezko, an indicted felon on trial facing charges of political corruption, amongst others:

1. Will Sen. Obama release all documents related to his relationship with Tony Rezko, including all documents related to his controversial land transaction?

2. When, specifically, did Sen. Obama become aware of Mr. Rezko's legal problems?

3. Sen. Obama has returned money from several individuals who are publicly associated with Mr. Rezko. How much money did Mr. Rezko bundle for Sen. Obama's campaigns in total, including people who are not business associates of Mr. Rezko? How many fundraisers did Mr. Rezko hold for Sen. Obama? Has there been an internal investigation to determine how many straw donors Mr. Rezko used to funnel money to Sen. Obama?

4. Much of the upcoming trial involves Mr. Rezko's efforts to control state boards as a means to defraud the state government. Have Sen. Obama and Mr. Rezko ever communicated about potential appointments to Illinois boards and commissions? It's been publicly reported that Sen. Obama lobbied these same state boards to secure contracts for campaign donors. Did Sen. Obama ever confer with Mr. Rezko concerning how to successfully lobby state boards?

5. The New York Times reported that Sen. Obama attended a business meeting on behalf of Mr. Rezko to impress potential investors for his business schemes. How many events did Sen. Obama attend on behalf of Mr. Rezko to impress investors? What was his role? Why did Sen. Obama agree to attend?

6. How many times did Senator Obama visit Tony Rezko's house? What were the purpose of these visits?

7. Did Sen. Obama intercede on behalf of Mr. Rezko in any governmental capacity?

The Fact Hub (broken link)
Those are all great questions!
http://rawstory.com/images/new/rezkoclinton.jpg (broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2008, 12:08 PM
 
Location: Chicago
4,688 posts, read 10,110,386 times
Reputation: 3207
Quote:
Originally Posted by BVH View Post
I am absolutely in favor of full disclosure from all candidates on their financial dealings. I think Hillary's latest tax returns ought to be released and added to the other 15 or so years of her tax returns that are a matter of public record.

Here are the questions for Obama to answer regarding his connections to TonyRezko, an indicted felon on trial facing charges of political corruption, amongst others:

1. Will Sen. Obama release all documents related to his relationship with Tony Rezko, including all documents related to his controversial land transaction?

2. When, specifically, did Sen. Obama become aware of Mr. Rezko's legal problems?

3. Sen. Obama has returned money from several individuals who are publicly associated with Mr. Rezko. How much money did Mr. Rezko bundle for Sen. Obama's campaigns in total, including people who are not business associates of Mr. Rezko? How many fundraisers did Mr. Rezko hold for Sen. Obama? Has there been an internal investigation to determine how many straw donors Mr. Rezko used to funnel money to Sen. Obama?

4. Much of the upcoming trial involves Mr. Rezko's efforts to control state boards as a means to defraud the state government. Have Sen. Obama and Mr. Rezko ever communicated about potential appointments to Illinois boards and commissions? It's been publicly reported that Sen. Obama lobbied these same state boards to secure contracts for campaign donors. Did Sen. Obama ever confer with Mr. Rezko concerning how to successfully lobby state boards?

5. The New York Times reported that Sen. Obama attended a business meeting on behalf of Mr. Rezko to impress potential investors for his business schemes. How many events did Sen. Obama attend on behalf of Mr. Rezko to impress investors? What was his role? Why did Sen. Obama agree to attend?

6. How many times did Senator Obama visit Tony Rezko's house? What were the purpose of these visits?

7. Did Sen. Obama intercede on behalf of Mr. Rezko in any governmental capacity?

The Fact Hub (broken link)
For those interested in a rational, fact-based look on the Obama/Rezko matter, and not guilt by association insinuations based by supporters of the Whitewater candidate , I'd hope you take a look at this.

TPMMuckraker | Talking Points Memo | Obama and Rezko: TPM's Timeline
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2008, 12:12 PM
 
Location: Dallas Texas
163 posts, read 908,774 times
Reputation: 144
Fair enough, I agree all candidates should disclose this type of info...but it works both ways.

This means Hillary has to show her tax returns, and the 2600 pages of records she won't release from the national archives, along with all the other documents she's working so hard to keep under wraps until after the election.

This also means McCain has to lay out the proof about the whole Keating five debacle, etc....

Good luck with all that
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2008, 12:13 PM
 
9,725 posts, read 15,174,356 times
Reputation: 3346
Gosh! Hillary looks so young in that photo! Was she the First Lady of Arkansas then?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2008, 12:14 PM
 
9,725 posts, read 15,174,356 times
Reputation: 3346
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigdummy View Post
Fair enough, I agree all candidates should disclose this type of info...but it works both ways.

This means Hillary has to show her tax returns, and the 2600 pages of records she won't release from the national archives, along with all the other documents she's working so hard to keep under wraps until after the election.

This also means McCain has to lay out the proof about the whole Keating five debacle, etc....

Good luck with all that
And Obama needs to show his papers from his Illinois Legislative career...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2008, 12:16 PM
 
Location: Charlotte
12,642 posts, read 15,602,495 times
Reputation: 1680
Quote:
Originally Posted by UB50 View Post
Gosh! Hillary looks so young in that photo! Was she the First Lady of Arkansas then?
Lol...she does look young, but not that young.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2008, 12:17 PM
 
Location: Charlotte
12,642 posts, read 15,602,495 times
Reputation: 1680
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigdummy View Post
Fair enough, I agree all candidates should disclose this type of info...but it works both ways.

This means Hillary has to show her tax returns, and the 2600 pages of records she won't release from the national archives, along with all the other documents she's working so hard to keep under wraps until after the election.

This also means McCain has to lay out the proof about the whole Keating five debacle, etc....

Good luck with all that
I thought it was over 10,000....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top