McCain-Palin campaign stonewalling the Troopergate probe by helping witnesses refuse to comply with subpoenas (Ron Paul, party affiliation)

[gsoboi]

Another sign Sarah Palin is guilty of wrong doing. What happened to transparency?

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/...obe/index.html

[sanrene]

They will be complying with the subpoenas from the Personnel Board, where this thing belongs, now that the dems have turned it into a partisan witch-hunt.

Good for her.

[scarlet52698]

Classic McCain wrangling. Turn the investigation over to people who work for you.

[gsoboi]

Originally Posted by sanrene

They will be complying with the subpoenas from the Personnel Board, where this thing belongs, now that the dems have turned it into a partisan witch-hunt.

Good for her.

Have you forgotton that Sarah Palin appointed the members of the personel board? You think thats fair? Also the Alaska legislative is dominate by republicans so I dont see how its the democrats that are after her. If she has done nothing wrong it shouldnt matter because they wont find anything on her. The fact that she wants this put in the hands of a board she appointed just sounds too suspicious.

[AONE]

I'm sure McLame would love for her indiscretions to go away. If you have someone that used their office to carry out a vendetta would you want them in a higher office? I have a hard time understanding how a party that use to profess their support of "family values" supports a man that repeated cheats on his wives. Nice values there. Partisan witch-hunt hmmm that brings up memories of Whitewater and Kenneth Starr the great waster of $58M.
I have a hard time understanding why republicans have such a hard time admitting that their candidate is less Republican than Bob Barr, the Libertarian candidate, it seems to me they would vote for him, He seems the perfect choice fort he Ron Paul supporters. Likewise, I have a hard time seeing why the democrats that don't like Obama don't go for Nader. I would love to see third parties win this time.
Obama - pros Cons
first serious minority candidate. a socialist
well educated, very bright minimal political experience(might be a pro)
he would be a change. Michelle

McCain
experience, educationally poor
knows Washington, bad temper,old, poor values
has the connections to get things done, Palin

Nader
Brilliant, scholarly seen as tree hugger - why is protecting environment bad?
well written, ran more than once in third party
professional, seen as too liberal
For the people

Barr
experience in wash, issues with marriage
educationally bright, switches party as convenience
republican values, hypocrit against cheating but does it,
influencial in DC, against abortion but wife had one


Well there you have the 4 major candidates. Who is the best choice? Who has the values you like?... Not the party affiliation you think you like. It seems there is a better choice to me than status quo. I would have liked to seen Ron Paul as a third party as I think he is the best Republican choice they had. Here is how he would have shaped up

Ron Paul
experienced, a little conservative in a few areas
for the Constitution and liberties, old looking
rights the wrongs, for the people not to sound like an RP supporter but im not finding anything
solid family values
educationally brilliant - a Dr.


Even I as a liberal have to say RP looks good, but so does Nader seems the two exemplify service,education, and the good of all. They seem like the only two that do. I wish it was them head to head, we would all win not matter who won.