Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So Todd Palin was a member of the Alaska Independence Party from 1995 to 2002. You could definitely say Todd "palled around" with his fellow party members. And I guess you could say that when Sarah was going to AIP conventions, she was "palling around" with AIP members, too. Which means that Todd and Sarah Palin are pals with terrorists.
Here's some stuff that AIP founder Joe Vogler said in 1991, a few years before Sarah palled around at his convention:
"The fires of hell are frozen glaciers compared to my hatred for the American government."
"And I won't be buried under their damn flag. I'll be buried in Dawson. And when Alaska is an independent nation they can bring my bones home."
"I'm an Alaskan, not an American. I've got no use for America or her damned institutions."
terrorism is a tactic where someone uses fear for political gain. this is just some people throwing around the idea of succession.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gsoboi
So Todd Palin was a member of the Alaska Independence Party from 1995 to 2002. You could definitely say Todd "palled around" with his fellow party members. And I guess you could say that when Sarah was going to AIP conventions, she was "palling around" with AIP members, too. Which means that Todd and Sarah Palin are pals with terrorists. And Todd is really a terrorist himself.
Here's some stuff that AIP founder Joe Vogler said in 1991, a few years before Sarah palled around at his convention:
"The fires of hell are frozen glaciers compared to my hatred for the American government."
"And I won't be buried under their damn flag. I'll be buried in Dawson. And when Alaska is an independent nation they can bring my bones home."
"I'm an Alaskan, not an American. I've got no use for America or her damned institutions."
Isn't it funny that Sarah Palin would totally distort the Times story and tell lies about Obama "palling around with terrorists," when, in fact, it is her husband who was actually the member of a secessionist group whose founder hated America.
Sarah Palin wants to bring up Rev Wright? I dont think she wants to go there. Why would Sarah Palin address a convention that says HORRIBLE things about our country. things that were said were FAR worse than what Rev Wright said.
actually, if you look at the idea of succession, it's something that will happen within 50 years. there is too much divide in this country, and down the road, they will totally return the power back to the states. we might not turn into 50 countries, but we will certainly be a divided nation, and that will be a good thing. society is not one size fits all.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gsoboi
Sarah Palin wants to bring up Rev Wright? I dont think she wants to go there. Why would Sarah Palin address a convention that says HORRIBLE things about our country. things that were said were FAR worse than what Rev Wright said.
actually, if you look at the idea of succession, it's something that will happen within 50 years. there is too much divide in this country, and down the road, they will totally return the power back to the states. we might not turn into 50 countries, but we will certainly be a divided nation, and that will be a good thing. society is not one size fits all.
Are you one of those that think the Civil War was actually the 'war of northern agression'? Do you still believe that the south will rise again?
no, I am a realistic person. I also don't know what agression is. I know what aggression is. I am one of those people who knows that the war was more about states rights than slavery (the easy scapegoat). I am also a prophet, and I can see things that others can't. the states have lots of rights that they don't use, and I think that over time, this country is going to change big time. I don't recall saying anything about the south rising again, I said that this is a divided country. I didn't think I had to be any clearer. perhaps a picture would help? ok here ya go. say is slowly, divided country. also, are you one of those people who thinks that the killing of 600,000 people was "civil?" what are your thoughts on iraq? did you support the civil war but not the war in iraq? why the selective support?
Quote:
Originally Posted by rightofcenter
Are you one of those that think the Civil War was actually the 'war of northern agression'? Do you still believe that the south will rise again?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
the states have lots of rights that they don't use, and I think that over time, this country is going to change big time. I don't recall saying anything about the south rising again, I said that this is a divided country. I didn't think I had to be any clearer. perhaps a picture would help? ok here ya go. say is slowly, divided country. also, are you one of those people who thinks that the killing of 600,000 people was "civil?" what are your thoughts on iraq? did you support the civil war but not the war in iraq? why the selective support?
