Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Don't try, you still will not see.These pieces of music are not worth the time spent on viewing them. I suspect that in addition to impotent rage and venom, there's nothing in them.
No, it's called the "Satire". Sorry if you are not familiar with a concept, ( Russians are actually very good when it comes to satire,) or if it brings too much "rage and venom" in response in you)))
Look at the artillery expert here. Okay early 80s, same thing.
Those guns have a 25 to 40 km range. Any Russians can't get near em...Ukraine is on its home turf so they know where to place artillery (after a few painful lessons before they realized Russia would be shelling them from inside of Russia).
The gun shown is a 2A36 Giasint B. It came into service in 1975. The 2A35 MSTA came into service 1987. It's the modernized version of the 2A36. It's lighter in weight and still in service in the Russian army but considered second tier because of it's lack of mobility. Ukraine has about 130 of these. I've seen them in use. Problem is the barrels are made in Chelyabinsk unless the Ukrops are making their own which I seriously doubt. I've seen video of the Ukrainians shipping SU-100s around. Where in the world they had them or who gave those things to them I don't know but that's kit the Germans had to worry about in 1944.
Ukraine is better sticking with the Grosvika 122mm because it's mobile and concentrate on their version of the MSTA. They're self propelled and would be able to shoot and scoot instead of shoot and end up scrap.
No, it's called the "Satire". Sorry if you are not familiar with a concept, ( Russians are actually very good when it comes to satire,) or if it brings too much "rage and venom" in response in you)))
They won't be using them against Ukraine. They want to pretend their army in Ukraine is a civil war which means no aircraft and no cruise missiles. Total war is another matter, but you have to understand that total war would not be limited to just those 2 countries. Its a fantasy...
You're probably right there. On the other hand what does Russia have to lose? I think that war is coming, best just get it over with.
Here is the problem; once you'll "press the tail of the Leningrad rat" for real, you'll push the button of the WWIII.
Because, as I've said before, Russia is really not at fault here. The WEST is.
Here is the problem; once you'll "press the tail of the Leningrad rat" for real, you'll push the button of the WWIII.
Because, as I've said before, Russia is really not at fault here. The WEST is.
Such are God's ways.
It's doesn't matter. He is target to fall down. Its verdict.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
