Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Fashion and Beauty
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-28-2016, 12:00 PM
 
Location: Middle America
37,409 posts, read 53,584,768 times
Reputation: 53073

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scooby Snacks View Post
It's perfectly appropriate for a midde schooler to wear a bra, especially if the girl is busty, so yes, it's appropriate for a saleswoman to suggest undergarments to wear with formal dresses. It's also appropriate for girls to wear panties and hosiery with dresses. But in our PC world, it's much better for people to act like shrinking violets for fear of "offending" someone's delicate sensibilities.
I was referring to people on the thread. The number of adults on this thread who have apparently strong opinions regarding what barely pubescent children should do to make their figures more appealing is, quite frankly, disturbing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-28-2016, 12:04 PM
 
Location: Brentwood, Tennessee
49,927 posts, read 59,955,675 times
Reputation: 98359
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlameHaze View Post
I think the root of this is because the girl goes in to buy a sexy dress, and is then offered advice on how to look her best. Which is obviously going to be looking slimmer. Because obese and sexy are contradictory terms.

Her mom then flips out over being told the truth.

I only see obese women doing this when told the truth.

I don't see *any* other group of people doing this.

I don't see low income people flipping out when they're told they make less money than Michael Bloomberg, and demanding they be referred to as "rich".
I don't see men under 5'5" in height, demanding everyone say they are equal in height to an NBA player and that they be called "tall".
I don't see deaf people demanding people say that they can hear.

Yet I *do* see obese women demanding that everyone tell her she looks just as good as an attractive woman. She doesn't. It's not like this was someone walking up to modestly dressed fat women and heckling her. Simply stating that a deaf person cannot hear is not offensive. It is a fact. So too is saying that a fat woman would look better if she were thinner. And I specify women here, because I don't see fat guys wigging out and claiming that George R.R. Martin is just as good looking as Ryan Gosling. This is specific not to fat people, but fat women. They want everyone to say that Gilbert Grape's mom, and Bruce Jenner in a wig are every bit as attractive as Ariana Grande, because "every woman is equally beautiful". This is an obvious untruth.

So the question I ask is, why is it that obese women should be able to demand that everyone lie and pretend things are untrue, but only for them?
Your analogies don't hold up because "rich," "tall" and "deaf" are all generally quantifiable, while "sexy" is purely subjective.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2016, 12:16 PM
 
Location: Paradise
4,876 posts, read 4,207,524 times
Reputation: 7715
Quote:
Originally Posted by TabulaRasa View Post
I was referring to people on the thread. The number of adults on this thread who have apparently strong opinions regarding what barely pubescent children should do to make their figures more appealing is, quite frankly, disturbing.


For that matter, so was the dress she was wearing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2016, 12:37 PM
 
Location: Birmingham
11,787 posts, read 17,777,511 times
Reputation: 10120
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scooby Snacks View Post
It's perfectly appropriate for a midde schooler to wear a bra, especially if the girl is busty, so yes, it's appropriate for a saleswoman to suggest undergarments to wear with formal dresses. It's also appropriate for girls to wear panties and hosiery with dresses. But in our PC world, it's much better for people to act like shrinking violets for fear of "offending" someone's delicate sensibilities.
Seriously I know you posted that false study in another thread but you have to realize that wearing a bra is more UNIFORMLY ACCEPTED in this society as being a NECESSITY especially if she is busty out of sheer modesty AND comfort than it would be compared to Spanx which is a TOTALLY OPTIONAL GARMENT designed to cover up and disguise an "imperfect" body. When women don't wear bras it is usually to make a statement, or because they are smaller chested and showing off a lot of clevage in a racy gown, or they are what many would consider slovenly or unkempt...not what the typical 13 year old is trying to attain.

I seriously doubt this article would gotten this much play if the salesclerk had just suggested she put a bra on....unless it was one of those +2cups VS jobs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2016, 12:50 PM
 
17,815 posts, read 25,642,029 times
Reputation: 36278
Quote:
Originally Posted by CSD610 View Post
So they now have thier 30 seconds of fame, yay them. The level of ignorance humans have is mind blowing.
Exactly, from the cop who whined that Starbucks wouldn't let him use the bathroom to this. Every slight has to be reported to the world now.

You have an issue with a store or a restaurant, address the management.

Would this woman feel justified if it cost someone their job?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2016, 01:05 PM
 
Location: Texas
44,259 posts, read 64,375,553 times
Reputation: 73937
Quote:
Originally Posted by lkb0714 View Post
The CHILD in questions absolutely could be fit. Children frequently go through phases of putting on weight and growing through it and a 13 yo is in all likelihood still growing. In fact it is the years grow the most.

My own daughter, who ended up a stately 5'10 and 130lbs at 21 would frequently gain 15lbs or so before going on a growth spurt and then slim back down. The entire time, with pudge or no pudge (as she calls it), she would be "fit". She surfed on a team, played varsity soccer and ran everyday with the team.

Focusing on weight in a middle schooler is a mistake. And yes, it is absolutely more important to focus on fitness at that age than the number on the scale or the "chunk" around the middle.
Not arguing this at all. Completely agree that weight can settle oddly on growing kids during various growth cycles.

But people seem to jump to this random, irrelevant "I'm fit!" bandwagon whenever confronted with lying outside their ideal weight.

And thinking "fitness" mitigates poor-eating and weight-related health risks at any age is delusional.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2016, 01:44 PM
 
Location: Birmingham
11,787 posts, read 17,777,511 times
Reputation: 10120
Quote:
Originally Posted by stan4 View Post
Not arguing this at all. Completely agree that weight can settle oddly on growing kids during various growth cycles.

But people seem to jump to this random, irrelevant "I'm fit!" bandwagon whenever confronted with lying outside their ideal weight.

And thinking "fitness" mitigates poor-eating and weight-related health risks at any age is delusional.
Internet wizards that think they can diagnose, summarize and speak from authority on the body composition, chemistry and nutrition level of another human just by looking at one picture of them are even worse.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2016, 01:45 PM
 
Location: SoCal again
20,764 posts, read 19,976,767 times
Reputation: 43163
Quote:
Originally Posted by stan4 View Post
Not arguing this at all. Completely agree that weight can settle oddly on growing kids during various growth cycles.

But people seem to jump to this random, irrelevant "I'm fit!" bandwagon whenever confronted with lying outside their ideal weight.

And thinking "fitness" mitigates poor-eating and weight-related health risks at any age is delusional.
Who cares if she it fit or not? She is overweight, has cellulite on her upper arms which suggest she is chubby since she was a small child.


It doesn't matter if she is fit, it doesn't make a difference in the argument - the store clerk wanted to make a sale and the mother blew it out of proportion and chose to make it public and ruin her daughters life for now and maybe forever. I would have wanted to die being exploited on facebook if I was that poor kid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2016, 01:55 PM
 
Location: Oakland, CA
28,226 posts, read 36,883,248 times
Reputation: 28563
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tourian View Post
That's fine and all but the article specifically says Spanx. And Spanx are marketed to make (big) women look slimmer and "better" in their clothes. So it is no shock to me that this woman could instantly go on the defensive if someone dare intimate that her daughter is fat by suggesting that she try that product.

I'm not saying that it is right or justified but that there are people out there looking to be upset or offended.
Actually Spanx gained notoriety with celebrities. Their initial sizing was meant for people under size 14 or so. Then they exploded and were sold everywhere. They really just reintroduced "modern" women to girdles. They had fallen out of favor after the 70s or so. Now there are lots of types of shape wear, Spanx is one of tube luxury brands.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2016, 02:08 PM
 
16,825 posts, read 17,736,880 times
Reputation: 20852
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scooby Snacks View Post
It's perfectly appropriate for a midde schooler to wear a bra, especially if the girl is busty, so yes, it's appropriate for a saleswoman to suggest undergarments to wear with formal dresses. It's also appropriate for girls to wear panties and hosiery with dresses. But in our PC world, it's much better for people to act like shrinking violets for fear of "offending" someone's delicate sensibilities.
You continue to ignore the fact that the mother wasn't annoyed by the offer but when the offer was rejected the sales person made comments about the child's body.

If you took your daughter to get clothes and the woman suggested a better bra and you said no thanks; if the sales person went on to make comments about how saggy your daughters breasts were you wouldn't be offended? What if they continued to argue with you about your daughters saggy misshapen breasts while you were leaving the store in front of your daughter? That wouldn't bother you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Fashion and Beauty
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:45 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top