Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive > Brand-specific forums > Ford and Lincoln
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-07-2012, 07:11 PM
 
Location: Eastern Washington
17,218 posts, read 57,085,908 times
Reputation: 18579

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrapperL View Post
The first one is a truck somebody has already screwed over. The second one isn't much better. The only way to get the 7.3 in any Excursion in 2003 was in an Eddie Bauer, otherwise the diesel option was the 6.0. Sounds like the engine has been transplanted. The asking prices are absurd at best. A super clean one one around here $8-10,000 tops and most will be less than that. Diesel is far too expensive, fuel mileage sucks at best, and these engines are not rated for low sulfur fuel making injection issues a concern. The vehicle you apparently are looking for is a black swan that nobody wants. Don't pay top dollar for it.
Is there a good solution (additive) for these that will make the injection last on low-sulfur fuel?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-07-2012, 07:52 PM
 
Location: Northern MN
3,869 posts, read 15,172,745 times
Reputation: 3614
Nether one.
A lift and towing a TT don't mix well.
and you can do better than the 2nd.

ULSF fuel is not a issue. There is more than enough lubricity right out of the pump for this truck and any other a additive is not necessary. A diesel is the correct choice ,a gas truck will get crappy millage
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2012, 10:18 PM
 
Location: Asheville, NC
215 posts, read 569,432 times
Reputation: 73
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrapperL View Post
The first one is a truck somebody has already screwed over. The second one isn't much better. The only way to get the 7.3 in any Excursion in 2003 was in an Eddie Bauer, otherwise the diesel option was the 6.0. Sounds like the engine has been transplanted. The asking prices are absurd at best. A super clean one one around here $8-10,000 tops and most will be less than that. Diesel is far too expensive, fuel mileage sucks at best, and these engines are not rated for low sulfur fuel making injection issues a concern. The vehicle you apparently are looking for is a black swan that nobody wants. Don't pay top dollar for it.
I read that the 7.3 was optional in any Excursion 2003 model??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2012, 09:02 AM
 
Location: Poway, CA
2,698 posts, read 12,175,341 times
Reputation: 2251
UH oh. I sense another gas vs diesel debate coming. Duck and cover!

Mike
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2012, 09:06 AM
 
29,503 posts, read 14,656,154 times
Reputation: 14457
I would walk on both. Right now there are MANY Excursions on the market , sure the prices are high on them for how old they are but they just don't make them anymore. Kind of hard to find something that has as much room and a #10k + towing capacity.
I'm a diesel guy and for the price and how much we use it , went for the V10 option. Picked a super clean one with 93k miles up earlier this summer for $10k. It had a lot of of the things that normally are need on these to safely tow already done. (rear sway bar, Timbren rear suspension, Aftermarket front hubs)
Also many say the 6.0 is fine after you change some things..I don't have much to say about that other than "change some things" for those that don't wrench can be up to $5k or more. I just have an issue with having to dump that into a motor that already should be reliable. All the diesels out there have one thing or another that needs to be addressed but the 6.0 seems to be the worst. Just my opinion.
All that being said, I love the Excursion. It's just too bad no one makes something comparable now.
Here is a link to a wealth of knowledge :
Excursion - King of SUVs - Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums

And if you have deep pockets just go this route:
Custom Autos by Tim ...The Stretch Truck Company!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2012, 09:19 AM
 
Location: Center Township (Pittsburgh), PA
556 posts, read 1,228,358 times
Reputation: 362
Was just looking at a few of the V10's to tow my Corvette to the track. Seems to be a great pulling motor for a gasser.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2012, 09:46 AM
 
18,069 posts, read 18,822,893 times
Reputation: 25191
Second one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2012, 09:48 AM
 
29,503 posts, read 14,656,154 times
Reputation: 14457
Quote:
Originally Posted by SK360 View Post
Was just looking at a few of the V10's to tow my Corvette to the track. Seems to be a great pulling motor for a gasser.
Coming from a modded Cummins to the V10, it gets the job done. It doesn't tow anything near what the diesel did but it's not really that bad. My truck has 3.73 gears and stock size tires and it pulls our #7k toy hauler okay. It would be better with 4.30's. The V10 likes to be spun up not lugged.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2012, 09:55 AM
 
Location: Northern MN
3,869 posts, read 15,172,745 times
Reputation: 3614
The 2003 Ford F-Series pickup truck equipped with the 6.8L V10 engine received poor fuel mileage rating. Ford does not publish V10fuel millage data, but the Environmental Protect Agency pegs the V10 as earning no more than 11 city 14 mpg. highway and that 14mpg is empty and with out a trailer in tow.
Towing a 10k trailer and it will drop to 9mpg.


A diesel would be a much better choice.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SK360 View Post
Was just looking at a few of the V10's to tow my Corvette to the track. Seems to be a great pulling motor for a gasser.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2012, 10:01 AM
 
28,115 posts, read 63,680,034 times
Reputation: 23268
Best vehicle I have ever used for long distance towing was my neighbors 7.3 Excursion... it was effortless going over the Cascades and I was impressed with the mileage and range.

He trades every 3 years because that is how much he tows for his business.

Owned all of the big tow rigs... some have had better performance and others luxury... none were as bare bones reliable and well suited to his towing as the 7.3 Excursion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive > Brand-specific forums > Ford and Lincoln
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:56 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top