imo, the banks have had ample opportunity to liquidate yet there are certain parts of the country where homes stand vacant in their thousands for sometimes years on end. at the same time the numbers of the homeless are rising exponentially. as far as i'm concerned banks have done little to address the problem and have essentially created an environment where squatting will become as socially acceptable as strategic defaulting.
now i'm all for free markets and property rights, but when the banks sidestep the market forces to liquidate, with taxpayer dollars (rigging the game in my books) i have to ask myself if what the 'squatters' are doing such a bad thing.
Murky law at center of property scuffle
from the article:
"
Bybel maintains he's done nothing wrong and simply began a business that not only gave him an income but - more importantly, he says - helped clean up a community left in
disarray by the economy."
"Admittedly,
Bybel has said, he knew he was operating in a "gray area," but he thought it was worth it to clean up Pasco. In fact, he said he thinks he was saving the county one house at a time while giving his tenants affordable places to live.
"I'm trying to help here,"
Bybel said Thursday. "Nobody else has got a good idea.
Maybe this is not the greatest idea, but it's an idea."