Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Where do I not need a car to get around?
Chicago 20 28.17%
Boston 12 16.90%
Philadelphia 14 19.72%
San Francisco 12 16.90%
Washington DC 8 11.27%
Seattle 2 2.82%
Miami 0 0%
Portland 2 2.82%
Denver 0 0%
Other 1 1.41%
Voters: 71. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-19-2017, 11:48 AM
 
Location: Northern California
4,606 posts, read 2,999,207 times
Reputation: 8374

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by That_One_Guy View Post
San Francisco is easily one of the best cities for waking, but I honestly don’t find their transit to be that great at all.
Compared to what? I'm sure it's not as good as NY, but for a western city, it's exceptional. I've lived in SF car-free for 25 years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-19-2017, 12:31 PM
 
Location: Center City
7,528 posts, read 10,259,737 times
Reputation: 11023
Quote:
Originally Posted by qworldorder View Post
^^I don't even know about that. True, the urban form is fantastic, but San Francisco is famous for its hills. Guess it depends on your perspective, but I can see how those steep hills can be an impediment for those in poor shape (and even those in great shape in certain situations). A walk from Midtown to Lower Manhattan, or Center City to University City seems that it would be far more pleasant in good weather conditions than a commensurate tourist walk in San Francisco.
It seems like SF would be virtually impossible to manage for someone with a mobility disability.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2017, 12:44 PM
 
Location: Boston, MA
14,483 posts, read 11,282,562 times
Reputation: 9002
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pine to Vine View Post
It seems like SF would be virtually impossible to manage for someone with a mobility disability.
Yeah, it's a great city but it's pretty damn hilly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2017, 12:50 PM
 
3,332 posts, read 3,697,576 times
Reputation: 2633
Quote:
Originally Posted by That_One_Guy View Post
San Francisco is easily one of the best cities for waking, but I honestly don’t find their transit to be that great at all.
^ True. Muni is pretty awful and slow as hell above ground imo and the bus system is no better then other walkable cities i.e. Philly, Boston, DC, Chicago etc.. they all have frequent bus lines that go down major roads at all hours of the day.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2017, 12:52 PM
 
Location: Ca$hville via Atlanta
2,427 posts, read 2,477,520 times
Reputation: 2229
Quote:
Originally Posted by simon22 View Post
Which major US city is the easiest to get by without a car excluding NYC?


Chicago, Philly, Boston would definitely be my top, followed by DC and San Francisco kind of equal in my eyes. Was really surprised how much public transit and coverage the Bay Area has when I was out there, especially rail... L.A can't even compete on a heavy rail note though it has pretty good Light rail coverage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2017, 02:46 PM
 
4,277 posts, read 11,787,860 times
Reputation: 3933
Philadelphia has managed to preserve and enhance a good hierarchy of bus/streetcar/subway/regional rail that is functional even on weekends and to the airport. SEPTA's looping regional lines through downtown end to end seemed weird to me at first but is actually an excellent way of integrating the legacy systems and getting more use out of equipment rather than stacking it up wasting center city real estate. The bike/ped system is reaching the point where it's a viable active transportation network.

Chicago still hasn't managed to integrate its regional rail in the same way, nor does it have enough weekend or airport service. Metra really should grow beyond the suits-from-the-suburbs-to-downtown-and-back model, though the considerable amount of actual freight that needs the track space could hinder the transition other cities have made.

Boston has weird gaps in its T lines, trips between central destinations sometimes take two transfers. I'm sure the appetite for another zillion-dollar boondoggle Big Dig II connecting North and South Stations isn't there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2017, 02:53 PM
 
Location: Maryland
4,675 posts, read 7,405,419 times
Reputation: 5363
I've personally lived car-free in both Boston and Chicago, and both were very doable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2017, 03:00 PM
 
4,277 posts, read 11,787,860 times
Reputation: 3933
DC seems good on bike/ped (relative flatness and more moderate climate helps) and buses. Metro needs to grow up as do the heavy-rail systems, recovering needed space in Union Station from the mall-y stuff that just doesn't need to be there anymore would be a good start.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2017, 03:48 PM
 
Location: East Bay, San Francisco Bay Area
23,535 posts, read 24,029,400 times
Reputation: 23962
San Francisco
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2017, 03:48 PM
 
Location: Manhattan!
2,272 posts, read 2,221,429 times
Reputation: 2080
Quote:
Originally Posted by qworldorder View Post
^^I don't even know about that. True, the urban form is fantastic, but San Francisco is famous for its hills. Guess it depends on your perspective, but I can see how those steep hills can be an impediment for those in poor shape (and even those in great shape in certain situations). A walk from Midtown to Lower Manhattan, or Center City to University City seems that it would be far more pleasant in good weather conditions than a commensurate tourist walk in San Francisco.
I love the Hills. It made walking through SF a lot of fun for me. I am young and in shape though, so that probably helps. I can see how it can be annoying for a lot of people.

Quote:
Originally Posted by NW4me View Post
Compared to what? I'm sure it's not as good as NY, but for a western city, it's exceptional. I've lived in SF car-free for 25 years.
Compared to a handful of the other poll options, like: Chicago, DC, Boston, Philly. I’m not even talking about NY. I think you’re right about it being best in the West though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top