Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-08-2015, 07:17 PM
 
Location: Somewhere in America
15,479 posts, read 15,626,751 times
Reputation: 28463

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by hbdwihdh378y9 View Post
Even 2?

No-fault divorce and same-sex "marriage".
What's wrong with no-fault divorce? Sounds like you haven't had the joy of spending YEARS in the court system while your parents duke it out. Everyone who has ever married should stay married no matter what until they die? Well, for some they end up like Nicole Simpson. Yes, that CLEARLY is a better alternative to a divorce. Certainly is better for the children.

Last edited by Jeo123; 09-08-2015 at 11:06 PM.. Reason: Removed Icons
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-08-2015, 09:35 PM
 
Location: Prepperland
19,029 posts, read 14,209,414 times
Reputation: 16747
Things About Marriage You Weren’t Told
==\==\==\==\==\==\==
• Marriage is a joining of property rights for the benefit of progeny.
• It’s not about love, nor religion, nor access to entitlements.
• From antiquity, societies that passed property via inheritance relied on marriage for establishing the bloodline of descent.
• Failure to have descendants was a tragedy, and left land at risk, at the death of the owner.
• Violating the bloodline of inheritance, via bearing a child outside of the compact was also frowned upon.
• However, since the advent of socialism, and the abolition of private property, the importance of passing property to the next generation has been diluted if not forgotten entirely. Worse, the government now claims a portion of the inheritance as if inheritance was a revenue taxable privilege, not an endowed right.
• Remember, two people in love do not need a legally enforceable, life long contract to remained joined. That compact was to preserve the joined property for the real beneficiary of marriage - the heir.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-09-2015, 07:01 AM
 
Location: Austin
15,637 posts, read 10,393,078 times
Reputation: 19530
Marriage is the best way statistically to grow personal wealth and raise children. Until those benefits become obsolete, marriage will continue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2015, 02:00 PM
 
Location: Myrtle Creek, Oregon
15,293 posts, read 17,687,736 times
Reputation: 25236
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
Not true.

Second chapter of the Bible has a man and woman coming together as one as the example of marriage. Peter had a mother-in-law that was mentioned in the gospels. Abraham had Sarah.
Adam and Eve were not Christians. Neither was Abraham. The Christian view of marriage can be found in Paul's first letter to the Corinthians, Chapter 7. Marriage is better than fornication, but if you marry there is no divorce and no adultery. As soon as America legalized divorce, it abandoned Christian marriage. In most cases, that happened before there was an America, and certainly before most states were part of the Union.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2015, 05:29 AM
 
Location: NH
818 posts, read 1,017,629 times
Reputation: 1036
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinkmani View Post
Marriage is one of the biggest traditions for Jews and Christians. I just don't understand why someone who isn't a Jew or a Christian would participate in it. Especially those who continuously insult Christians by calling us "idiots that worship a fantasy figure in the sky" and tell us that the bible is outdated.

I don't understand why nonbelievers get married. It wasn't for secular folks; hence why they can't handle it and end up divorced more often than believers. Marriage is a biblical concepts for those who live their lives by the bible.





According to Dr. Bradley R.E. Wright's "Christians Are Hate-Filled Hypocrites... and Other Lies You've Been Told: A Sociologist Shatters Myths From the Secular and Christian Media":
  • Catholic couples were 31% less likely to divorce
  • Protestant couples 35% less likely
  • Jewish couples 97% less likely


According to Shaunti Feldhahn's "The Surprising Secrets of Highly Happy Marriages":
  • 53% of Very Happy Couples agree with the statement, "God is at the center of our marriage" (compared to 7% of Struggling Couples)
  • 30% of Struggling Couples disagree with the statement, "God is at the center of our marriage."
  • "Active conservative protestants" who attend church regularly are actually 35% less likely to divorce than those who have no religious preferences
  • "Nominal" Christians (those who simply call themselves Christians but so not actively engage with the faith) are actually 20% more likely than the general population to get divorced
This is a good point. Like Easter and Christmas, Marriage has lost its meaning and purpose. It has become commercialized much like every aspect of the American experience. All of the comments about money relating to it say something. The reason is money. When a country's people and the courts weigh everything on a scale with money on the other end to balance it, the system and people have failed.

Why do people of no faith acknowledge Christmas and Easter would be another related question.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2015, 07:20 PM
 
4,749 posts, read 4,323,760 times
Reputation: 4970
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scratch33 View Post
LOL. What makes you think marriage is either an invention of or exclusive to Jews and Christians?
Because it started with Christians and Jews...

Quote:
Originally Posted by rodentraiser View Post
Don't look in my direction. I'd prefer a civil ceremony myself, but because the word for a civil union is shorter and has a more common meaning, I will still call it a marriage anyway. And as far as I'm concerned, it has all the meaning of a "traditional" marriage to me, like it or not. Marriage doesn't have to be religious. Christians think they might own the word, but in reality, we can all use it. And nobody has to pay a royalty to do so.


That is without doubt the funniest thing I've read in a long time. I don't suppose you're talking about people like Trump, or Josh Duggar, or Swaggart the Braggart or Kenneth Copeland or Jim Bakker or any of the rest, was it?



It could be worse. Without the evil divorce laws, you'd be stuck with that blood sucking partner the rest of your life.
Christians no longer own the word because we allowed secular folks to steal it and ruin the sanctity of marriage.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Caldwell View Post
Christians are not supposed to get married, they are supposed to live a chaste life and await the resurrection. It's right there in the bible. Marriage is not a Christian tradition, and was not allowed in the church until the 12th century.

Perhaps you would explain why someone who claims to be a Christian would ever get married.


MARRIAGE IS A CHRISTIAN TRADITION!

Lol, it's funny when folks like you try to tell em what the bible says. Crack it open again... Read 1 Corinthians 7:1-9; it clearly says, "Now to the unmarried and the widows I say: It is good for them to stay unmarried, as I do. But if they cannot control themselves, they should marry, for it is better to marry than to burn with passion."

Quote:
Originally Posted by Know Nonsense View Post
This is a good point. Like Easter and Christmas, Marriage has lost its meaning and purpose. It has become commercialized much like every aspect of the American experience. All of the comments about money relating to it say something. The reason is money. When a country's people and the courts weigh everything on a scale with money on the other end to balance it, the system and people have failed.

Why do people of no faith acknowledge Christmas and Easter would be another related question.
You made another wonderful point! It's all about commercialization... It was fine when an overwhelming majority of the country was Christian, but now since people don't want Christ in their life, these holidays and biblical traditions shouldn't apply to them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2015, 11:51 AM
 
Location: Myrtle Creek, Oregon
15,293 posts, read 17,687,736 times
Reputation: 25236
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinkmani View Post
You made another wonderful point! It's all about commercialization... It was fine when an overwhelming majority of the country was Christian, but now since people don't want Christ in their life, these holidays and biblical traditions shouldn't apply to them.
It's true, Easter is only of interest to Christians and Hallmark. The solstice festival long predates Christianity or the Bible, and Christians have adopted it. Originally there were 12 days of Christmas from December 25 to the feast of the epiphany on January 6 (12th night) but western Christians have abandoned that in favor of the solstice celebration, which is certainly more seasonal. The Orthodox church still celebrates the original Christian Christmas on January 6.

As for marriage, Christians are free to marry or not as the urge strikes them. Legally, anyone wishing to be married has to buy a marriage license from the county clerd, and anyone performing a marriage has to register it with the county clerk. That includes ship captains and justices as well as ministers with a state license. Churches have never been in control of marriages in the USA, have not issued marriage licenses, and certainly do not choose the county clerk. Christians need to mind their own business and not stick their noses where they do not belong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2015, 01:01 PM
 
3,298 posts, read 2,474,646 times
Reputation: 5517
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scratch33 View Post
LOL. What makes you think marriage is either an invention of or exclusive to Jews and Christians?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinkmani View Post
Because it started with Christians and Jews...
You truly believe that no marriages took place anywhere on planet earth prior to Jews and Christians coming into existence?

To put it politely, you're seriously misinformed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2015, 08:52 AM
 
7,934 posts, read 8,593,400 times
Reputation: 5889
It's one of those things that will never completely go away but it's pretty clear that the farther a society advances both socially and technologically, the less popular it becomes. Simply put, men and women no longer need each other to the extent they used to. I wont comment on the advantages and disadvantages of this...it just is what it is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2015, 08:31 PM
 
9,408 posts, read 11,933,771 times
Reputation: 12440
Marriage is faulty concept from the get-go. To expect two people to remain only with each other for their entire life is ridiculous. Expect them to not grow old of having sex with the same person over and over and over, and over and over. Or in many cases no sex at all. People change drastically over the course of their lives. Yet married people are expected to get along through all the changes, many to their own detriment. I think it will remain around for many, many years to come, but increasingly people are realizing the folly of entering into that contract and are choosing not too. It will gradually wane, but the die-hards with stars in their eyes will keep it alive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:26 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top