Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-10-2015, 08:23 AM
 
3,259 posts, read 3,768,572 times
Reputation: 4486

Advertisements

I suppose the first question is... desalination... could it ever be possible to be efficient enough to be widely used? Given the number of population centers built along seas and oceans, it seems like a no brainer that if we could figure out how to make the process economically feasible, it would solve the world's water problem. And it also stands to reason that if we are pulling billions of gallons of water out of the oceans, we could combat our major world cities built along coastlines from being underwater in a few hundred years.

What are the barriers to desalination? Is it merely the amount of energy it takes to desalinate that makes it unreasonable? Is it a question of what we would do with all the salt? If it is is merely the amount of energy it takes to desalinate, it seems to me like a major breakthrough in power generation is all we would need to solve the problem... and that seems far more likely whether it be through highly efficient solar panels, fusion power, or something else than the chances of us discovering massive amounts of freshwater.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-10-2015, 06:12 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
8,548 posts, read 10,971,365 times
Reputation: 10798
Quote:
Originally Posted by steveklein View Post
I suppose the first question is... desalination... could it ever be possible to be efficient enough to be widely used? Given the number of population centers built along seas and oceans, it seems like a no brainer that if we could figure out how to make the process economically feasible, it would solve the world's water problem. And it also stands to reason that if we are pulling billions of gallons of water out of the oceans, we could combat our major world cities built along coastlines from being underwater in a few hundred years.

What are the barriers to desalination? Is it merely the amount of energy it takes to desalinate that makes it unreasonable? Is it a question of what we would do with all the salt? If it is is merely the amount of energy it takes to desalinate, it seems to me like a major breakthrough in power generation is all we would need to solve the problem... and that seems far more likely whether it be through highly efficient solar panels, fusion power, or something else than the chances of us discovering massive amounts of freshwater.
\Massive amounts were ours for the asking from the governor of alaska in the seventies.
He had plans already written, and designed to run a pipeline from his state to California, and he was turned down by the state water resources board.
I think that idea needs to be researched once again.
The governor's study said it would be less expensive than building plants along the California coast to desalinate the ocean water.

Bob.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2015, 07:14 PM
 
Location: Fredericksburg, Va
5,404 posts, read 15,991,884 times
Reputation: 8095
All the water on the earth is the same water that's been on the earth for 4.5 BILLION years....water is the ultimate recycled element! If you desalinate water, drink it...flush it, or wash your car, water your lawn, etc...the water goes right back into the oceans......

It's still too expensive to be a viable means of potable water. It will do NOTHING about rising water levels, tho...

What has happened is...the underground water has been used...pulled out of the ground,and by being used, has gone into the environment...thereby raising water levels a bit....

We simply need to move our structures AWAY from the coast. We aren't going to drown..no fears...but coastal areas might get damp! Before mankind started building on the shoreline, there was no problem with rising water levels.. This isn't an enviromental problem...it's a human building in the wrong place problem!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2015, 07:18 PM
 
Location: Someplace Wonderful
5,177 posts, read 4,790,047 times
Reputation: 2587
Desal is not magic. It is a very expensive way to obtain clean water. Takes a lot of energy to produce enough to impact water needs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2015, 10:06 AM
 
4,345 posts, read 2,792,327 times
Reputation: 5821
I read that CA can desalinate water for $0.01 per gallon. That's the plant San Diego is putting in service soon. Compared to bottled water, the success of which is the best argument imaginable against democracy, that's not much. For agriculture and industry it could be significant, I don't know.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2015, 10:41 AM
 
4,345 posts, read 2,792,327 times
Reputation: 5821
How do they figure sea water rises? It looks simple if you think of it as water in a cylinder, unaffected by tides or waves. It's a little harder when you try it for natural settings.

Even harder, how do they predict sea water levels? Especially, how do they predict sea levels will rise by 3 or 30 feet by 2100? That seems a very tough row to hoe. Water added to a sphere increases the radius of the sphere (i.e., sea level), but at a decreasing rate. The rate of rise is a constant multiplied by the inverse of the volume raised to the three halves power. There's another factor: shores slope away from the water surface "faster" than the radius along which they emerge from the water. So a given increase in volume will increase the sea level even less than the formula says. (The Earth is actually a spheroid, but the same relationship holds, except that its spin will force more sea level rise to the circumference where the surface of the sphere is farthest from the shortest diameter's midpoint.)

How do they take this into account?

I don't know how desalination effects sea levels. It's hard to imagine that enough water could be put into what is in effect temporary storage to have much impact.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2015, 11:48 AM
 
Location: Howard County, Maryland
16,553 posts, read 10,618,310 times
Reputation: 36572
Quote:
Originally Posted by cb at sea View Post
It's still too expensive to be a viable means of potable water. It will do NOTHING about rising water levels, tho...

What has happened is...the underground water has been used...pulled out of the ground,and by being used, has gone into the environment...thereby raising water levels a bit....
Why wouldn't desalination help with the rising water levels? Water has been removed from underground aquifers in order to meet our consumption and agriculture needs. If we substituted desalinated water for underground water, wouldn't the underground "storage tanks" replenish (due to rainwater, snow melt, etc.) and fill back up enough to reduce the rising ocean levels?

I know nothing about the science or economics of desalination. But I do know that human ingenuity has solved plenty of other problems in the past, so I see no reason why it can't do so here, given the ever-increasing need to find substitute water sources due to the steady depletion of our existing freshwater sources.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2015, 06:24 PM
 
231 posts, read 171,658 times
Reputation: 125
I expect that the real issues would be a small increase in greenhouse gas emissions and a highly saline solution flushed into the ocean. You could expect some detrimental environmental effect near the plant, but I can't see how it's much worse than a sewage outlet.

I have a faint memory of calculating the cost once, and it really wasn't too bad. Average house use of water would increase your power bill by something on the order of 25%, although don't hold me to it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2015, 10:15 AM
 
Location: Chattanooga, TN
3,045 posts, read 5,241,513 times
Reputation: 5156
There is no known method of desalination that is so effective it will affect sea levels. Mainly because the water is used by houses/agriculture/commercial immediately adjacent to the coast, then the waste water is treated and put right back in the ocean.

The theories behind sea level rise is that average global temperatures are rising (1) which will cause water locked away in glaciers on the ice caps to melt. In order to mechanically stop sea-level rise you would have to find some way to store water somewhere not in the ocean. Theoretically this could be done by using depleted aquifers or dry lake beds in the Great Basin region of the USA, but it's not very realistic.

During pre-historic periods of global warmth the sea simply rose and formed swamps everywhere (picture any scene involving dinosaurs).


Note (1): I'm not arguing for or against man-made global warming. Also, a simple cold spell does not mean global warming is a myth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2015, 10:55 AM
 
6,205 posts, read 7,458,155 times
Reputation: 3563
Desalinization is a practical solution used successfully in many parts of the world. Countries like Saudi Arabia rely on desalinization for all their drinking water supply. The problem is that the process is heavily based on electrical consumption and is both costly and pollutant.
A pipe from Alaska to California can be practical (no different from oil pipes from Canada to the south).

Last edited by oberon_1; 05-12-2015 at 11:07 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top