Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-06-2018, 09:07 AM
 
272 posts, read 218,427 times
Reputation: 513

Advertisements

I know they were supposed to get it in '45 but given the dire circumstances why not just go ahead and show some good will by giving in? Certainly better than having tanks and soldiers march down pennsylvania avenue beating/shooting them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-06-2018, 10:43 AM
 
Location: Pennsylvania
5,725 posts, read 11,725,323 times
Reputation: 9829
Politically speaking, he should have tried it. The optics you describe certainly didn't help his re-election chances. Even a down payment of sorts would have helped. But he may have been too far gone politically anyway.

Interestingly, payments weren't authorized until 1936, a re-election year for Roosevelt, but it was passed over Roosevelt's veto. So Hoover wasn't alone in his position.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2018, 01:24 PM
 
10,503 posts, read 7,058,349 times
Reputation: 32344
Quote:
Originally Posted by YuMart View Post
I know they were supposed to get it in '45 but given the dire circumstances why not just go ahead and show some good will by giving in? Certainly better than having tanks and soldiers march down pennsylvania avenue beating/shooting them.
At that point, nothing was going to help Hoover. When it came to the economy, the man took a medium-sized brush fire and, through his policies and legislation, essentially dumped twenty gallons of gasoline on it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2018, 01:25 PM
 
Location: West Virginia
16,703 posts, read 15,701,811 times
Reputation: 10938
With the country in the midst of the Great Depression, where do you think the money would have come from to pay the bonuses?
__________________
Moderator posts are in RED.
City-Data Terms of Service: http://www.city-data.com/terms.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2018, 07:23 PM
 
14,411 posts, read 14,334,102 times
Reputation: 45764
America could have greatly benefited during the early years of the Depression from virtually any and all deficit spending. Paying veterans their bonus early would have been very sensible for a start.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-10-2018, 04:49 PM
 
Location: 912 feet above sea level
2,264 posts, read 1,487,885 times
Reputation: 12668
Quote:
Originally Posted by mensaguy View Post
With the country in the midst of the Great Depression, where do you think the money would have come from to pay the bonuses?
The bonuses being sought were established by law in 1924, with the vast majority coming due in 1945.

However, in 1936 Congress passed the Bonus Act, which replaced the award certificates from the 1924 law with treasury bonds which were immediately redeemable - and the vast majority of veterans who received the bonds promptly redeemed them. The depression was still ongoing in 1936.

While it is true that federal receipts were much higher in 1936 than they had been in 1932 (the year of the Bonus Army), it is also true that the 1936 deficit was larger as a percentage of GDP than in 1932. So it certainly could have been paid in 1932 - and should have, as it was a ready-made stimulus opportunity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2018, 08:21 AM
 
8,428 posts, read 7,432,258 times
Reputation: 8776
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulsker 1856 View Post
The bonuses being sought were established by law in 1924, with the vast majority coming due in 1945.

However, in 1936 Congress passed the Bonus Act, which replaced the award certificates from the 1924 law with treasury bonds which were immediately redeemable - and the vast majority of veterans who received the bonds promptly redeemed them. The depression was still ongoing in 1936.
Note what Hulsker's post illustrates - President Hoover couldn't have just paid the Bonus Army because only Congress can decide where to spend federal money. Buying off the former soldiers occupying city spaces in DC wasn't possible for any President.

The Bonus Army "re-occupied" Washington when Franklin Roosevelt was president. Roosevelt's response to the protesters was to accommodate them with a campsite in Virginia, to provide them with three free meals per day, and to sent officials, including his own wife, to converse with the members of the Bonus Army. While Roosevelt's people commiserated with the protesters, the most the Bonus Army got from him were campsites, food, sympathetic ears, speeches from Eleanor Roosevelt and promises of positions in the newly created Civilian Conservation Corps. FDR issued an executive order that waived age and single-marriage status requirements for the CCC so that the WW1 veterans could immediately sign up with the federal program.

I love this quote from a Bonus Army protester (shamelessly lifted from the Wikipedia article): "Hoover sent the army, Roosevelt sent his wife".

It's also interesting to note that Congress in 1936 passed a law over FDR's veto to immediately pay the bonus to the veterans, overriding the original legislation that would have paid out the bonus in 1945.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:06 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top