Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Houston
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-10-2011, 09:17 AM
 
12 posts, read 18,538 times
Reputation: 22

Advertisements

Hello Everyone;
Here is our story; We recently made an offer to a house around lot value and the owner accepted. We are planing to tear down the house and build a new one. It it in Shady acres and we really like the lot.
When we visited the property we have notice the family lives in there has really poor financial and living conditions and we have decided to let them to stay 6 months for free since we still need to shop around for builders. House is nearly in tear down conditions and there is nothing valuable in there. The family has inherited years ago and has been living there such a long time.

2 page standard lease contract has 90 day provision and our both agent said we need to put $10 per day even tough we are not asking for it.
Than my husband said "it will show as a rental income in our income tax!"

So how can I let these people to stay for free? Any opinion?

thanks!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-10-2011, 09:52 AM
 
Location: The Greater Houston Metro Area
9,053 posts, read 17,204,558 times
Reputation: 15226
Have you already told them it was free?

The reason I asked is that they need to save the money for a deposit on a rental - and my guess is they will not be able to do so. Rather than collect rent, you could collect "deposit" - and then give it back to them at move-out. Of course, you are going to give it back that day, no matter the condition of the house. This would actually help them out more, since they are not used to paying rent and will have a tough time accumulating the deposit and rent for later. They basically would be using you as a bank, until time to move. If you don't do this, I have a real strong feeling you will have to evict later because they won't have the money to move. That won't help either side.

If you have already told them they wouldn't be paying, make someone else the bad guy and tell them you were told that you have to charge.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2011, 12:25 PM
 
2,277 posts, read 3,962,366 times
Reputation: 1920
Something about letting them stay there for free doesn't seem right legally. Consult a lawyer before you make any decisions. Kindness can come and bite you in the ass. The liability alone on letting someone live on your property (especially without a legal contract) is horrendous.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2011, 12:27 PM
 
Location: Charleston Sc and Western NC
9,273 posts, read 26,503,633 times
Reputation: 4741
^^^
Liability. If they get hurt on your property they can and most likely will sue you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2011, 12:43 PM
 
Location: Houston area
1,408 posts, read 4,055,298 times
Reputation: 639
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lost_In_Translation View Post
Something about letting them stay there for free doesn't seem right legally. Consult a lawyer before you make any decisions. Kindness can come and bite you in the ass. The liability alone on letting someone live on your property (especially without a legal contract) is horrendous.
Yes, I'd be very skeptical and would even advise against it.

If you have a tenant in place, free or not, you will have to carry insurance on the property in case something happens. If something does happen to them, they can sue you if you don't have insurance.

Highly recommend getting rid of them or getting insurance to let them stay free.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2011, 02:34 PM
 
488 posts, read 1,383,948 times
Reputation: 333
What is the world coming to where you can't show human kindness without worrying about being sued - we should all collectively hang our heads in shame
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2011, 02:49 PM
 
543 posts, read 1,387,532 times
Reputation: 343
It's really sad that we're in such a ligitation society that an act of kindness is considered not wise.

ebruli - take extra precaution because it will protect your family but please don't let it deter you from offering help to someone when you can.


Questions for all: What kind of liability if you let the family stay without the lease? If they don't move out when you ask them to move after 6 months, can you call the police for trespassing as you have nevered agreed (on paper) to let them stay. Would it be easier and less costly that way than a lease conviction. Also, that way you don't have to carry liabiltiy insurance as a landlord. Can you just considered it as someone taking advantage of an empty house, similar to the homdless people who's taking advantage of forclosed house and live in there for free while the bank figoure things out?

Last edited by MNCold; 02-10-2011 at 02:58 PM.. Reason: Addition
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2011, 03:43 PM
 
Location: The Greater Houston Metro Area
9,053 posts, read 17,204,558 times
Reputation: 15226
Quote:
Originally Posted by MNCold View Post
It's really sad that we're in such a ligitation society that an act of kindness is considered not wise.

ebruli - take extra precaution because it will protect your family but please don't let it deter you from offering help to someone when you can.


Questions for all: What kind of liability if you let the family stay without the lease? If they don't move out when you ask them to move after 6 months, can you call the police for trespassing as you have nevered agreed (on paper) to let them stay. Would it be easier and less costly that way than a lease conviction. Also, that way you don't have to carry liabiltiy insurance as a landlord. Can you just considered it as someone taking advantage of an empty house, similar to the homdless people who's taking advantage of forclosed house and live in there for free while the bank figoure things out?
I wasn't thinking earlier about the fact that, as a house to be torn down, the OP would not carry insurance on the house. CityLove is right, that opens up a liability if there were a fire, etc.

If the OP just pretended not to know they were there - and something happened - they could still sue and possibly prove that the OP did know.

What if they were just charged the amount of rent to cover the building insurance? The OP would have to do more tax paperwork, but it would look like a loss on paper.

Still doesn't cover the future problem - that when it's time for them to move, they won't have the money to do - and eviction would have to happen. All problems are avoided if no one is living on the property at the time of closing.

The OP sounds like a very nice person and it is a shame that so many things could come back to bite.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2011, 04:22 PM
 
23,995 posts, read 15,096,054 times
Reputation: 12962
If the house were not occupied, they still need liability insurance. What if a neighborhood kid wandered in and got hurt? Is it to remain vacant until the new house is decided upon? The taxes are as of January 1. If they tore it down the day they closed, would the taxes be reduced? Could the tenants stay on as caretakers? Everything signed up front as to the day they vacate. If they do not have enough sense to plan ahead to get into another home, they need more help than we can offer. Even if we had that jogging milk thief on our team.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2011, 05:35 PM
 
Location: A little suburb of Houston
3,702 posts, read 18,219,237 times
Reputation: 2092
Quote:
Originally Posted by MNCold View Post
If they don't move out when you ask them to move after 6 months, can you call the police for trespassing as you have nevered agreed (on paper) to let them stay.
No you can't. Like it or not, those folks are considered tenants and would have all the protection afforded them by state law. If a written lease does not exist, they are considered month to month (depends on when payments are due i.e. week to week). To get them out you would have to go through the eviction process.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Houston
Similar Threads
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top