Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Judge lets Mexico have voice in suit on Ariz. immigration law (http://azstarnet.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/article_c81d6afe-8568-11df-bf46-001cc4c002e0.html - broken link)
"PHOENIX - Mexico gets to have a say in one of the lawsuits challenging Arizona's immigration enforcement law.
A federal judge on Thursday granted Mexico's request to be allowed to file a legal brief supporting the challenge. That means the judge will consider the brief Mexico submitted previously."
That link didn't work, and the only result I can find on a google search comes from "Impeachobamacampaign.com"
At any rate, they aren't doing anything the United States doesn't do when our citizens are on trial for anything. I disagree in the Mexican government having a say in court, although this is largely symbolic, as the judge won't consider it in his ruling, and no Jury will ever hear it.
Mostly, this is diplomatic, and if there is a US citizen in Mexico needing a voice from home, they'd thank the judge for this measure.
I imagine this is a 'friend of the court' brief (amicus curiae). Very common in Federal court. It is not considered 'evidence'. The Supreme Court often allows such briefs (it is at the court's discretion, of course).
Only if arizona has a say it the laws of mexico.....ant goin to happin ..lol
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.