Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Investing
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-28-2009, 04:14 PM
 
37,315 posts, read 59,878,910 times
Reputation: 25341

Advertisements

shows our account from 1/07 to 4/09--since we have been with him only that long...and under the line item distributions there is a negative number in the (xxxx) for the total time
but it is not broken out into any particular year or quarter...
we did not really have time to go over the summary with him at the face to face--maybe deliberately on his part in that he was talking about where the market was likely to go and how after booking our losses, the new funds would really be better to capture market increase...


also we discovered after our face to face this past week, that the total +/- on the 2 yrs period is just flat out wrong...he has us losing under 10%
totally missed the boat--
is this deliberate attempt to obscure how bad our loss was
is it just shoddy bookkeeping/printout that his secretary or one of his clerks did and he did not check
either one pisses me off...
I sent him an email today and did not get response--will have to call tomorrow...
how do you call him on this without getting into real name-caller
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-29-2009, 07:44 AM
 
28,453 posts, read 85,392,786 times
Reputation: 18729
Unless your financial guy is Bernie Madoff, odds are that the titles are used to correspond to "tax definitions" -- so that a negative under distributions might mean your investments have "sold at a loss" so that you have some stuff to deduct instead report as gain.

I am NOT an expert on this, and you need to get the financial guy and/or your tax people involved.

Similarly if the "position" is trying to reflect what your net gain / loss is after the taxable losses and such it might make sense that this is NOT the same as your "total return".

I like the "big guys" because their statements are generally down loadable into your own spreadsheet or financial software and if you want to change the format it is up to you, not some secretary that has no clue...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Investing
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:54 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top