Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Arkansas > Little Rock - Conway area
 [Register]
Little Rock - Conway area Pulaski, Faulkner, Grant, Lonoke, Perry, and Saline Counties
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-10-2012, 10:48 PM
 
52 posts, read 78,012 times
Reputation: 15

Advertisements

ok i know this wil never happen but just think would it be good for the two citys if they got the olympics
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-11-2012, 05:17 PM
 
Location: Little Rock AR USA
2,457 posts, read 7,382,198 times
Reputation: 1901
Out-O-Sight - but as you wrote, it will never happen, because they will never cooperate enough to make it happen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2012, 03:16 AM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
697 posts, read 1,775,543 times
Reputation: 703
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArkansasSlim View Post
Out-O-Sight - but as you wrote, it will never happen, because they will never cooperate enough to make it happen.
It's more complicated than cooperation I think. Or even that it'd be an overall (net) financial boost. The cities are far too small and do not have the financial strength to cover the potential billions in overruns that come with being in the running for an Olympic site. The Olympics typically do not make money. If you break even, you're doing good. The real benefits are typically the facilities left over after the Olympics that can be put to use and used to host major events (and theoretically increased tourism through better name recognition, etc.), but even then it's not necessarily a good thing for the cities financially and they can be left with billions in public debt and facilities that cost millions a year to maintain and have to do some serious event volume to break even, which is not a guarantee of course. From a financial perspective the Olympics are a big gamble and not necessarily one with the odds in favor of paying off. It's more about prestige, pride, and recognition and you need to be able to afford the price those things come with if you want to host. But, as mentioned, it's a moot point since there's no possibility of this happening. If the metro area was around 4,000,000 instead of 700,000 this would be a more realistic possibility.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2012, 11:47 AM
 
Location: Charlotte, NC (in my mind)
7,943 posts, read 17,254,198 times
Reputation: 4686
America is going to have a hard time getting the Olympics again after the disaster that was the 1996 Atlanta Olympics, but even if they did come to America I don't believe Little Rock has the infrastructure to support it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2012, 06:45 PM
 
Location: Little Rock AR USA
2,457 posts, read 7,382,198 times
Reputation: 1901
My reply was intended to be a little , but of course they are not big enough to have one, and have a reputation of not cooperating. I think the OP recognized it would never happen but was offering a "what if" question.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2012, 06:57 PM
 
Location: Fishers, IN
6,485 posts, read 12,535,852 times
Reputation: 4126
Quote:
Originally Posted by bchris02 View Post
America is going to have a hard time getting the Olympics again after the disaster that was the 1996 Atlanta Olympics, but even if they did come to America I don't believe Little Rock has the infrastructure to support it.
The Atlanta Olympics were a disaster only in the minds of those on the IOC. Yeah, we all heard stories of the issues with bus drivers not knowing where they were going, and that religious nutjob Eric Rudolph sure did throw a monkey wrench in things (Does Munich ever get such criticism for having a terrorist event at its Olympics?). Overall, however, I think the IOC treated Atlanta like garbage for complaining about the "over commercialization" of the Atlanta Games. All of those corporate sponsorships greatly reduced the taxpayer burden, and there was smart use of new and existing facilities.

But as others have noted, Little Rock simply isn't large enough to put on the Olympics. I doubt it could even afford the security apparatus required, and it would undoubtedly be forced to sustain several white elephants afterwards. Little Rock is more likely to suffer the fate of Nagano or Athens than Los Angeles, Atlanta or Salt Lake City.

After the way the IOC treated Atlanta and Chicago's 2016 bid, I couldn't care less if the Olympics ever came back to the U.S.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2012, 04:13 AM
 
Location: Jacksonville, Arkansas
369 posts, read 1,302,444 times
Reputation: 311
bralon01, you've got quite an imagination.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Arkansas > Little Rock - Conway area
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top