Cadillac biker build off (bike, motor, 2011, lights)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If you are thinking paul Jr's bike is a bit low? its got a hydraulic suspension that lowers the bike when parked..
Its probably explained in this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ziO1edk4i04
Both have their traits, but both have things I really don't care for.
OCC's definitely does a better job 'capturing the essence' of a CTS-V. You can't argue with that beast of a motor, especially when combined with that extra shot of nitrous. I also like the hard angles on their bike. Nothing about the CTS-V is smooth and flowing and it has a very athletic stance. None of this translates in the PJD bike.
But in terms of outright aesthetics, I really do like the PJD bike. There is an insane amount of detail in there, and the 'muffler as a kickstand' idea is just friggin' awesome. I could do with a slightly smaller diameter front wheel (looks cartoonish), and the headlight seems like an afterthought, but I'm more attracted to the overall lines and flow of the PJD design. And I have to admit, I still get a chuckle out of how they came up with the rear taillights (watch the episodes).
JR's definitely carries offf the CTS-V style much better. I really don't see mucvh of it in the (OCC bike.Jr's is really one pof the best themje bikes either has every done really.Its got Cadalliac class written all over it.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.