Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Entertainment and Arts > Music
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-29-2010, 05:42 PM
 
Location: Austin
2,522 posts, read 6,037,405 times
Reputation: 707

Advertisements

This is what the Beatles were digging on the Telly in John's Aunt Mimi's basement in 1958....and they thought at the time that if they could be as cool as Billy Fury, they had it made....

This is as cool as it got in the 50's in Britain, before the "Invasion" in the 60's....England was biding its time, coping the US bands, and ready to storm across the pond..

..But not quite yet, when these songs/videos were laid down..


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6qyXy...eature=related


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=800DG...eature=related

http://www.youtubhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xfrT4...eature=related

You want to know what the beatles copped? listen to these..
now you know..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-30-2010, 12:20 PM
 
18,217 posts, read 25,861,807 times
Reputation: 53474
I posted a bit ago on another one of the very worthy threads started by inthe cut on Cliff Richard, noting his career output and the fact that for reasons I did not understand at the time (and still don't) why his career wasn't more popular in the States than it was. At least Cliff got credit where credit was due with a few top 5 singles from the late 70's.

With Billy Fury, it's just as puzzling. He has over a dozen 45's issued by London records, and a handful of 45's with other labels. To my best guess, no albums were ever released by Fury. That certainly is not the case across the pond as Fury released over 50 45's and EP's on Parlophone from 1958 to the early 80's (and recorded many lp's as well.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-30-2010, 02:32 PM
 
Location: Las Vegas
1,384 posts, read 1,932,175 times
Reputation: 1923
Quote:
Originally Posted by DOUBLE H View Post
I posted a bit ago on another one of the very worthy threads started by inthe cut on Cliff Richard, noting his career output and the fact that for reasons I did not understand at the time (and still don't) why his career wasn't more popular in the States than it was. At least Cliff got credit where credit was due with a few top 5 singles from the late 70's.

With Billy Fury, it's just as puzzling. He has over a dozen 45's issued by London records, and a handful of 45's with other labels. To my best guess, no albums were ever released by Fury. That certainly is not the case across the pond as Fury released over 50 45's and EP's on Parlophone from 1958 to the early 80's (and recorded many lp's as well.)
Billy Fury got thisclose to getting a crack at the American audience at the early height of his career in 1960, when he featured on a British tour by Eddie Cochran. Cochran was so impressed with Fury that he went to work on trying to set up a U.S. tour for Fury---work that was interrupted tragically when Cochran was killed in the British car crash that also crippled Gene Vincent.

But the title of this thread is extremely misleading. Billy Fury was one influence on the Beatles-in-the-making (they actually auditioned for a chance to back Fury on a tour, an audition they flunked), but the Beatles weren't influenced by a single performer or style even if much of what they loved was U.S. rhythm and blues and rockabilly and hearing Elvis when he broke big during their middle teen years kick-started the individual future Beatles' interest in rock and roll in the first place.

They hybridded what they liked best and made it come out as their own way, in their music and their stage style, even when they began going from good to great slogging it out in the Hamburg clubs where the name of the game was mak schau!. It's a complete misnomer to suggest there was any single performer from whom the Beatles drew influence, even if they were big fans of Billy Fury (and didn't think---with plenty of good reason---that he was the sellout they came to believe Cliff Richard was).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-30-2010, 03:23 PM
 
Location: Austin
2,522 posts, read 6,037,405 times
Reputation: 707
I agree that the Beatles would give their influences, including Fury, all the credit they had coming to them....just a wrong way to put it...The Beatles, actually, were completely restyled by Brian Epstein right before their big move to stardom in England, per the Mod suits, skinny ties, mop hairdo's...style was always far more important in England, and Europe for that matter....

But my point is, if you look at any of the old pics of the Beatles before Epstein's "makeover", they all look like Billy Fury, Eddie Cochran, Cliff Richards, and gang, as that was all they saw on the telly and on concert bills....though buddy holly and the crickets would end up their biggest influence..and I think most people know that the Beatles were a homage, per name, to the Crickets..
Attached Thumbnails
Billy Fury....The great 50's Brit rocker that the Beatles copped their moves from-quarrymen.jpg  
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-30-2010, 03:39 PM
 
Location: Las Vegas
1,384 posts, read 1,932,175 times
Reputation: 1923
Quote:
Originally Posted by inthecut View Post
But my point is, if you look at any of the old pics of the Beatles before Epstein's "makeover", they all look like Billy Fury, Eddie Cochran, Cliff Richards, and gang, as that was all they saw on the telly and on concert bills....though buddy holly and the crickets would end up their biggest influence..and I think most people know that the Beatles were a homage, per name, to the Crickets..
The Beatles actually began wearing the soon-to-be-fabled mop tops before Brian Epstein caught hold of them. Then-bassist Stu Sutcliffe had the style first; his girl friend Astrid Kircherr fashioned it for him (he actually looked rather handsome in it, better than his greased-back quasi-Elvis look), and while the others cracked up the first time they saw it, apparently George Harrison didn't think it was all that funny---he turned up with the same style within days, and Paul McCartney followed, though it took John Lennon awhile to decide to go for it. (Pete Best was the only holdout, partly because he thought his hair was too curly to be straightened reasonably into the style, and mostly because he didn't like the style at the time.) They kept the leather jackets and slacks, though, until Brian Epstein decided they needed to smarten up their appearance just a tad. Considering how slim the Beatles' stage suits were, it wasn't that much of a stretch.

Astrid Kircherr may also have influenced their eventual collarless-suit style of early-to-mid 1963---she had a similar outfit that Sutcliffe liked, so she apparently made a male suit for him with the same jacket, and in time the other Beatles harked back to that when deciding on band suits in the early Epstein days.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-30-2010, 04:47 PM
 
Location: Austin
2,522 posts, read 6,037,405 times
Reputation: 707
great comments..London was a cauldron of fashion creativity in the early 60's, as post-war scarcity actually lasted about 15 years...took that long to rebuild the economy and city(country)...America was awash in prosperity all through the 50's, while the brit kids coundn't even afford electric guitars, and had to make to with skiffle make-shift guitars and such...

About 1960 or so, things suddently opened up..like the sun came out again after 15 years, and fashion was the first harbinger of the same, in London....King's road fashions took the world by storm, and the mini-skirt(named after the MG mini car), and hot pants, along with Mod fashions(actually first started out of gay habidasheries) took much of the world by storm, and fashion was a much larger part of the Brit Invasion that most think, prob as much as the music....The Who's Mod fashions were MORE important than the music, at least at the beginning, with mod lingo like "I'm the face" in their songs....

Mary Quant and Alexander Plunkett Green, along with Vidal Sassoon, were the biggies on that scene....fashion so so important that Mod/rocker fights took place at the time(Hence Ringo's famous pun on being a "mocker")...I believe one of the reasons Stu Sutcliffe was kicked in the head(later leading to a fatal brain hemmorage) was of a "rocker" taking offense to his Mod clothes, though I could be wrong...sounds like that was the case though

Found out more about Stu Sutcliffe....He definitely would have been as talented and influential as McCartney and Lennon..Considering that he outranked Lennon as the de facto group leader, he prob would have been the Alpha in the Beatles as well....

He named them the Beetles(His spelling), after seeing a gang named the same in this movie..


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCENBce_dls

he was definitely the best looking of the beatles....that alone would have made him the leader, as he had moviestar matinee looks...but he had tremedous talent, painted in abstract impressionist style, and just had that flair...

Here is a memorial website dedicated to him...

Stuart Sutcliffe Estate
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Entertainment and Arts > Music

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:31 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top