Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So, what's the deal with Hunterdon Central???? Yikes!! I would not have guessed that such crappy results would come from that part of the state.
Hunterdon Central is one of the largest high schools in the state. It's also regional, so you bring in all types of trash from all over the area, which brings the school down.
Hunterdon Central is one of the largest high schools in the state. It's also regional, so you bring in all types of trash from all over the area, which brings the school down.
Let's put this to bed. Hunterdon Central is in the TOP 15% of SAT scores in the state. Got it? k!
when you're on the graph, run your cursor over the line at the bottom --- hunterdon central.... okay?
Hey Everyone, I went to JFK in Paterson! Take a gander at those test scores! Of course when I went there, during the late Pleistocene, if you didn't get at least a "1200 combo" you were considered a retard! How times and the students there have changed!
This list annoys me somewhat because it does not acknowledge the format change that took place in 2005 (despite that the graph goes to 2007). In 2005 the Verbal section was removed and replaced with Writing and Critical Reading, thus raising the maximum potential score from 1600 to 2400. I'm not saying it would make much of a dent in the overall results, especially since the Critical Reading section is essentially a re-tooled Verbal section, but the list states "Average SAT combined math and verbal score" despite the fact that post 2005, there was no verbal section.
The change just added 800 possible points for a writing section. the scores can be compared. People who take the new sat can translate for people who took the old one. For example, "I got a 2250 on the SAT/ which is like a 1500 on the old scale".
The change just added 800 possible points for a writing section. the scores can be compared. People who take the new sat can translate for people who took the old one. For example, "I got a 2250 on the SAT/ which is like a 1500 on the old scale".
I'm mostly just being anal about it.
Oh, and I'm still slightly bitter that the format change occurred exactly around the time when I was taking SAT. The first administering of the new version was March of 2005...which was when I ended up taking it =/
okay? here it is! OBVIOUSLY there is a mistake on the search. do you REALLY think it's ranked 357?
As someone pointed out, there appears to be an error in the graph.
And no, I REALLY didn't know where it was ranked... thus, my actual surpirise which was why I asked in the first place.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
