Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-07-2021, 11:27 AM
 
Location: Manhattan
8,954 posts, read 4,838,922 times
Reputation: 6015

Advertisements

FYI

https://www.thecity.nyc/2021/11/1/22...-landmark-bill

The effort to electrify buildings is getting a new boost — this time, at the state level.

While a bill in the City Council that would effectively ban gas hook-ups for new construction is stalled in negotiations, state lawmakers are pushing a more sweeping measure that would require new buildings across the state to be all-electric by 2024. And by 2023, an all-electric building would not be able to convert to using fossil fuels.

The landmark bill, introduced in May by Sen. Brian Kavanagh (D-Manhattan, Brooklyn) and Assemblymember Emily Gallagher (D-Brooklyn), was amended in late October to accelerate timelines.

“We cannot allow any new fossil fuel infrastructure and still reduce emissions enough to avert climate catastrophe,” Gallagher said on Monday as President Joe Biden assured world leaders at the United Nations climate conference in Glasgow that the U.S. would meet its climate goals.

Kavanagh said he’s optimistic the state measure has the support needed to pass. If it does, New York would be the first state in the nation to mandate all-electric buildings. More than 50 municipalities in California have all-electric building codes, and other cities, including Seattle and Ithaca, are advancing electrification in new buildings.

New York real estate leaders say the bill expects too much, too soon. Technology isn’t quite ready for gas-free buildings, opponents say, noting that all-electric structures would largely rely on energy generated by fossil fuel-powered plants.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-07-2021, 05:33 PM
 
729 posts, read 541,175 times
Reputation: 1563
Electric heating is expensive heating. Decades ago when I lived in an apartment in the western southern teir of New York, my winter gas heating bill was about $80 per month. Two years later I move to another apartment closer to work. That apartment was all electric. The winter electric heating bill was around $270 per month. There is good economical reason that most homeowners choose gas over electric to heat their homes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2021, 09:57 AM
 
Location: In the heights
37,417 posts, read 39,884,033 times
Reputation: 21474
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoldenHair View Post
Electric heating is expensive heating. Decades ago when I lived in an apartment in the western southern teir of New York, my winter gas heating bill was about $80 per month. Two years later I move to another apartment closer to work. That apartment was all electric. The winter electric heating bill was around $270 per month. There is good economical reason that most homeowners choose gas over electric to heat their homes.

Right, it's a lot more expensive if you're using electric resistance heating which was what most electric heating has been in the past. The resistance heaters are themselves about as efficient as gas heaters and similar, but the electricity to supply it loses quite a bit in the generation and a little bit in the transmission. For example, if your utility uses a natural gas plant to generate electricity, even at a fairly good 60% efficiency of a combined cycle plant, then it doesn't matter that at the end the resistance heater does a nearly 100% conversion of that electricity to heat, because you had already lost out on 40% upstream. Compare that with natural gas heating with the pipes where you also get 100% efficiency, but you lose almost nothing in the conversion.


However, an increasing amount of electric heating is no longer resistance heaters, but with heat pumps and those are a lot more efficient because they don't just generate a modicum of heat but also move heat from one location (usually outdoors) to where you want it. These often have coefficient of performance (COP rating) that's above 100% and heat pumps can reach a COP of 3 or 4 compared to the almost 1 of an electric resistance heater or natural gas heating. Previously, these often performed pretty poorly once at or below freezing outdoors, but steady work on them especially in Japan and much of the rest of East Asia has made it so that they perform fairly well with COP still above 1 even in subzero temperatures. That much higher COP then makes it so that the heat pumps of the last several years are now effective and efficient even in most of New York State's winter temperatures save for the coldest parts of the coldest days in the Adirondacks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2021, 02:10 PM
 
3,852 posts, read 4,542,652 times
Reputation: 4517
Maybe don't shutter the nuclear plants if you want to go all-electric.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2021, 02:14 PM
 
94,560 posts, read 125,629,170 times
Reputation: 18344
Quote:
Originally Posted by Interlude View Post
Maybe don't shutter the nuclear plants if you want to go all-electric.
There are still a few near Lake Ontario with 2 in Oswego and one in Ontario.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2021, 10:53 AM
 
Location: In the heights
37,417 posts, read 39,884,033 times
Reputation: 21474
Quote:
Originally Posted by Interlude View Post
Maybe don't shutter the nuclear plants if you want to go all-electric.

Or at least have another plan in place. The HVDC line from Quebec is good, but that should have been in place years ago before or during the Indian Point shutdown.

Indian Point shutting down is overall probably a good idea as while the probability of catastrophe was very low at least as far into its life cycle as we know it, that low probability carried with it extremely high repercussions because within its 5 mile radius was one of the primary water catchments for downstate and there were and are a lot of other options like the Quebec HVDC line.

Last edited by OyCrumbler; 11-09-2021 at 11:41 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:25 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top