Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-20-2017, 02:10 PM
 
Location: Colorado
730 posts, read 769,459 times
Reputation: 1084

Advertisements

I was chatting with some of my friends (we are all in our mid to late 40's) and it's interesting to hear about people starting over financially or having some minor financial crises in their 40's due to all kinds of set backs. Personally, we are doing ok but our kids having serious medical issues at young ages definitely affected our financial goals.
I've recently heard stories of folks in this midlife time really struggling because of divorce, aging parents medical issues, relocating issues. Etc.

How common do you think financial upsets are during midlife? I'm not talking about mismanaged things, I'm taking about serious medical issues (cancer treatments, etc.), divorces, COL increases if you have to move for a job.

Did past generations have to deal with this?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-20-2017, 02:40 PM
 
Location: Omaha, Nebraska
10,358 posts, read 7,990,783 times
Reputation: 27768
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoodlemomCoS View Post
Did past generations have to deal with this?
Of course they did. Life's never been easy for any generation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2017, 04:58 PM
 
Location: Boise, ID
8,046 posts, read 28,481,404 times
Reputation: 9470
Yes, but not necessarily as severely in some categories.

People are living to an older age than most/all? prior generations, so taking care of aging parents can go on for a lot longer, and cost a lot more.

Divorce is also a lot more common and a lot more expensive than most prior generations had to deal with.

I think the biggest problem most people have today is that they live AT their means, rather than below them, and if the means increase, so does the lifestyle. So if some form of catastrophe does strike, they are completely unprepared. I don't know that that was so much different in the past, though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2017, 06:21 PM
 
Location: Colorado
730 posts, read 769,459 times
Reputation: 1084
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aredhel View Post
Of course they did. Life's never been easy for any generation.
I guess I see a slight difference in the generations from personal experiences. My parents and my husband's parents have pretty healthy pension funds. They didn't worry as much about saving for retirement in their day to day financial equation so they did other things with their money, maybe bigger emergency savings. But that's just what I've seen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2017, 06:36 PM
 
24,559 posts, read 18,269,032 times
Reputation: 40260
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lacerta View Post
Divorce is also a lot more common and a lot more expensive than most prior generations had to deal with.
Errr... No.

The divorce rate peaked in 1980. It's the same now as it was in 1970. Back then, divorce law assumed a stay-at-home wife so alimony for life was the norm. Divorce was far more costly then than now when it's assumed that most couples are dual income.

Washington Post citation on divorce rates: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.ea5bab8567ff
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2017, 06:59 PM
 
Location: Omaha, Nebraska
10,358 posts, read 7,990,783 times
Reputation: 27768
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoodlemomCoS View Post
I guess I see a slight difference in the generations from personal experiences. My parents and my husband's parents have pretty healthy pension funds. They didn't worry as much about saving for retirement in their day to day financial equation so they did other things with their money, maybe bigger emergency savings. But that's just what I've seen.
Only two generations, the Greatest and the Silent, had significant access to pension funds - and only about 50% of workers in those generations even had pensions. Pensions and a secure retirement were a historical anomaly. People also used to assume their kids would take care of them in their old age, which isn't an assumption most people can safely make today.

Honestly, people need to take a longer view and look at the average person's life prior to WW ll, not just life during the latter half of the 20th Century. Life has never been easy for ordinary people (financially or otherwise).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2017, 08:11 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles area
14,016 posts, read 20,910,117 times
Reputation: 32530
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aredhel View Post
Only two generations, the Greatest and the Silent, had significant access to pension funds - and only about 50% of workers in those generations even had pensions. .............
I would modify that statement slightly to add the older Boomers as having had access to fairly good pensions. Since the decline of pensions in the private sector was a gradual thing - not all companies and not all industries did away with them at the same time or even all at once - it's difficult to pin it down to a precise decade, even.

Only now - last ten years or so - are the public sector pensions being dialed back.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2017, 09:01 PM
 
Location: Colorado
730 posts, read 769,459 times
Reputation: 1084
Yup my parents are boomers and they have awesome pensions! I wish those still existed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2017, 09:27 PM
 
5,724 posts, read 7,485,113 times
Reputation: 4523
I am starting over. It takes so long to build a life. It can also be destroyed in a short time. I can't hate myself. I did what I thought was best.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2017, 09:46 PM
 
Location: Victory Mansions, Airstrip One
6,759 posts, read 5,058,954 times
Reputation: 9214
It if fairly common I think. One guy I worked with drained his 401k in an (unsuccessful) attempt to save his wife from cancer. He was around 40 y.o. at the time. Know several who were set back by divorce. Yet others got burned out by the corporate grind and just quit to do something not so stressful.

Could be worse. Two co-workers died in their 30s, one from lymphoma and another from a heart attack. Several more that were in their 50s. Got to enjoy life a bit too as you never know...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:41 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top