Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-10-2010, 09:53 AM
 
2,085 posts, read 2,471,182 times
Reputation: 877

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by sailordave View Post
Yeah, it's W's fault for the economy. Wasn't W blamed for the .com bubble burst and the corporate scandals that came to light right after he was sworn into office (even though they happened during Clinton's time in office)?
Don't forget, Hilary blamed the right wingers for the "lies" about her hubby's affairs. Maybe that was just Bush's fault too.
I don't think that is was Bush's fault. 911 started the fall of our economy. Bush didn't help much in his last term, but Obama catapaulted into major melt down.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-10-2010, 10:01 AM
 
Location: Here and there
1,808 posts, read 4,042,436 times
Reputation: 2044
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Do you think somewhere along the line that maybe the whacking off the top should be done away with and EVERYONE should pay taxes?
No, I am just trying to get over the hurdle of folks not paying their liability. I certainly do, probably because I pay in much more than my standard deduction, but do not make enough to avoid them.
So, you find yourself within the half that does not pay taxes, huh? I find it interesting that you would bring that up as a reason as to why we are so upside down. Interesting indeed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2010, 10:08 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,186,917 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bulldawgfan View Post
No, I am just trying to get over the hurdle of folks not paying their liability. I certainly do, probably because I pay in much more than my standard deduction, but do not make enough to avoid them.
I'm the opposite.. I earn far more deductions than I make. Heck one year I got a tax refund (or I should say check since I dont pay taxes) large enough to support my family for the following year. (it was more than I spent on my first home, thats how large it was) I used it to start a stock investment company. Ridiculous, but who is going to turn away a check you are rightfully and legally entitled to? The system is messed, but dont blame me, I only use it, I took no part in creating it..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bulldawgfan View Post
So, you find yourself within the half that does not pay taxes, huh? I find it interesting that you would bring that up as a reason as to why we are so upside down. Interesting indeed.
I've been part of the 1/2 that dont pay taxes for about 10 years now.. Ever since becoming self employed. Even though I go through great lengths to legally avoid taxes, that doesnt mean I dont understand the economic situation and the cause of the national problems. In fact, it probably means I understand the problems more than most since I have numerous businesses setup for the sole purpose of creating more deductions than profits.

Last edited by pghquest; 06-10-2010 at 10:17 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2010, 10:20 AM
 
Location: Here and there
1,808 posts, read 4,042,436 times
Reputation: 2044
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
I'm the opposite.. I earn far more deductions than I make.
I read through the post you linked and I can honestly say that, with my income, the tax code is not something I can utilize, let alone understand. But, with all due respect, I am glad you can utilize the whole confusing publication to your advantage.Legally, that is! But we have never really addressed how to compensate the intake side of the equation. Are you suggesting that reducing spending is the only answer?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2010, 10:22 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,186,917 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bulldawgfan View Post
I read through the post you linked and I can honestly say that, with my income, the tax code is not something I can utilize, let alone understand. But, with all due respect, I am glad you can utilize the whole confusing publication to your advantage.Legally, that is! But we have never really addressed how to compensate the intake side of the equation. Are you suggesting that reducing spending is the only answer?
You need to
1) Reduce spending
2) Reduce deductions
3) Simplify the tax code
4) Make it so everyone pays because as long as 1/2 the population dont pay anything, (many actually receive checks), thats 1/2 the country voting for more handouts and more exemptions instead of whats best for the country..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2010, 10:24 AM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,772,644 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
He didn't sign NAFTA, CFMA or GLBA.

He didn't repeal Glass-Steigall or mandate the GSEs buy CRA subprime home loans that later became the toxic elements in the unregulated CDOs behind the subprime meltdown.

He didn't take the advice of Robert Rubin and Larry Summers to leave credit default swaps free of regulation.


On Monday President Clinton announced an "all-out" campaign to lobby Congress to pass permanent most-favored-nation status for China. The lobbying will be rough, with a fully mobilized American business community working as the iron fist inside the administration's velvet glove. The same day Clinton kicked off his new campaign, U.S. Chamber of Commerce President Thomas Donohue warned, on cue, that members of Congress who oppose permanent trade status for China "will find themselves in an unhappy situation with the business community."

Clinton's China Two-Step - Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

“On derivatives, yeah I think they were wrong and I think I was wrong to take [their advice] because the argument on derivatives was that these things are expensive and sophisticated and only a handful of investors will buy them and they don’t need any extra protection, and any extra transparency. The money they’re putting up guarantees them transparency,” Clinton told me.

Clinton: I Was Wrong to Listen to Wrong Advice Against Regulating Derivatives* - Political Punch

Clinton vowed to veto the Senate version of the bill unless it was re-written to include "requirements that banks make loans to minorities, farmers, and others who have had little access to credit." The new version passed 90-8 in the Senate, passed the House, and Clinton signed it into law. Clinton's required reworking of the bill should be studied closely to see what role, if any, it played in illegal, often racist, subprime loans at higher rates than Caucasian borrowers were offered.

ICKY PEOPLE: Phil Gramm, Bill Clinton Key Culprits in Subprime Meltdown



YouTube - President Bill Clinton - Remarks on the Signing of NAFTA


and before we go there...


YouTube - WMD AND THE "LIARS" WHO SAID SADDAM HAD THEM



So let's hear it Bush haters.

What specifically did "W" do to trash the US economy?

You KNOW it is all BUSH's fault. It is cloudy in NJ today, that is Bush's fault too. I was given the wrong coffee this morning, Bush's fault!!!!

Obama and Clinton are perfect. Anything that goes wrong.........IT IS BUSH'S FAULT!!!!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2010, 10:40 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,157 posts, read 44,939,566 times
Reputation: 13739
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackandproud View Post
so we're in agreement that the deregulations occured in the 90's when there was a Democrat President and the Republicans were the majority in both houses..
We agree that Clinton's Treasury Secretary pushed for the deregulation and Clinton signed it. Gramm was used by both Summers and Summers's bankster buddies.

Summers's involvement (Summers now 'just happens' to be Obama's top economic advisor ) in this is quite deep, and the manipulation and lies continue:
Zach Carter: Larry Summers Is Lying About Big Banks
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2010, 10:54 AM
 
Location: Here and there
1,808 posts, read 4,042,436 times
Reputation: 2044
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
You need to
1) Reduce spending
2) Reduce deductions
3) Simplify the tax code
4) Make it so everyone pays because as long as 1/2 the population dont pay anything, (many actually receive checks), thats 1/2 the country voting for more handouts and more exemptions instead of whats best for the country..
I can fully agree and enjoyed the discussion.
Back on the thread theme... isn't blame so much better to give than receive? Blame is tossed around here like oil bubbling up in the gulf... but not one post accepting responsibility/fault. Can both sides possibly be wrong from time to time? Absolutely. History cannot be rewritten, despite the effort to do so.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2010, 11:03 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,186,917 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bulldawgfan View Post
I can fully agree and enjoyed the discussion.
Back on the thread theme... isn't blame so much better to give than receive? Blame is tossed around here like oil bubbling up in the gulf... but not one post accepting responsibility/fault. Can both sides possibly be wrong from time to time? Absolutely. History cannot be rewritten, despite the effort to do so.
I dont think anyone is to blame.. Recessions take place, even depressions.. Its an economic cycle. I find the liberals needing someone to blame for a natural cycle humorous..

Was this one harder than most cycles, of course, but with 911, 2 wars, and numerous other activities taking place, I would have been surprised if it wasnt a bad recession. But that doesnt mean its not a natural occurance.

Heck, I waited for years waiting for the housing market to collapse so I can pickup a new home at a song.. Even fought with the gf over the timing because all of her idiot relatives were out buying homes over priced for more than they could afford.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2010, 11:17 AM
 
Location: Here and there
1,808 posts, read 4,042,436 times
Reputation: 2044
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
I dont think anyone is to blame.. Recessions take place, even depressions.. Its an economic cycle.
The whole "you have to have bad times in order to judge good times against?" Or perhaps "Nothing endures but change". Well I cannot argue that point... but it does not make me feel any more comfortable knowing that some day this to shall pass.
But in the case of this thread, we have a conservative asking for proof of blame. Conservative/liberal... it is all brought to you by the department of redundancy department.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:39 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top