Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I would like to give this woman the benefit of the doubt, but it seems she's done everything possible to make her entire life history an impenetrable black box, just so that she can get on the SCOTUS. We don't know a single political view that she holds.
We know that she didn't want Military Recruiters on campus as allowed by law.
We know she takes money from Islamic groups though it defies some of her own beliefs.
We know she hold distain for at least some parts of the Constitution.
It is the Supreme Courts job to determine if Laws pass Constitutional muster not decide what the Constitution says.
That is known and very clear already.
All too often sections, such as the Commerce Clause, are twisted into something that is far from the meaning and intent thus changing the Constitution by judicial fiat which in itself is unconstitutional.
Thereby Lawless.
We need members that preserve our Rule of Law, not fit an agenda.
Sure she can be trusted about as much as Ginsburg, Beyer, Sotomayor and Stevens. She can be trusted to turn this country into a European Socialist Clone. She can be trusted to uphold the law on slaughtering millions on unborn children every year. She can be trusted with a lot of things.
I heard that she's a careerist lawyer with no core principles. Is that true?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.