Destroys what little credibility the IPCC had left.
FOXNews.com - Independent Audit Panel Slams U.N.'s Climate Group
Quote:
|
"The IPCC report is filled with statements of '90% certainty' without even saying 90% of what or providing any basis for such statements. Yet those pronouncements of certainty were used over and over as though that had been scientifically proven somehow," he told FoxNews.com.
|
Quote:
|
The IAC took issue with the IPCC's use of so-called gray literature as well, papers from unpublished or non-peer-reviewed sources.
|
Such material was supposed to be a no-no, but the IPCC used this kind of literature, over and over again.
About time. The whole cabal has finally crumbled, no one believes their AGW BS anymore, partly cause none of their predictions ever come true.
http://m.npr.org/news/front/129526958?singlePage=true
Quote:
The InterAcademy Council, a collection of the world's science academies, outlined a series of "significant reforms" in management structure needed by the IPCC, a body that won a Nobel Prize with former Vice President Al Gore in 2007.
Last year, a batch of errors embarrassed the authors of the climate report. Among the most prominent were misleading statements about glaciers in the Himalayas.
|
Goodbye Rajenda, you friggin con man.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
