Which could violate international law.
US embassy cables: UN seeks answers from Washington | World news | The Guardian
Quote:
United Nations official says US order to diplomats to glean intelligence on UN leadership may breach international law
The senior American diplomat at the UN tonight defended her team after WikiLeaks disclosed a US spying operation targeting the UN's secretary-general, Ban Ki-moon, and members of the security council.
Susan Rice, the US ambassador appointed to the UN by Barack Obama last year, appeared uncomfortable and, at times, exasperated as she took questions from the media at the UN today.
|
Oh dear, I guess she wasn't very forthcoming, not very much interested into getting into the juicy details.
Well, let's just take a look, shall we?
US diplomats spied on UN leadership | World news | The Guardian
Quote:
A classified directive which appears to blur the line between diplomacy and spying was issued to US diplomats under Hillary Clinton's name in July 2009, demanding forensic technical details about the communications systems used by top UN officials, including passwords and personal encryption keys used in private and commercial networks for official communications.
Washington also wanted credit card numbers, email addresses, phone, fax and pager numbers and even frequent-flyer account numbers for UN figures and "biographic and biometric information on UN Security Council permanent representatives".
|
What in the world are we to make of the most transparent administration...evah......behaving in such a fashion?
The rule of law? Not for this bunch.
What if it does violate International Law? Isn't that something liberals hold dear to their hearts? Would that then make obama an international criminal?
I mean really, who could have envisioned this from obama? His supporters
must be in shock.
What a humiliating, embarrassing, unprecedented debacle of epic proportions.