Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Democrats want to zap American job creators ( small busineses ) with huge tax increases to pay for Obama's social agenda. None of Barack's theories have come true. He thought that spening a couple of trillion dollars would help our economy........at least that's what he and Biden have said.
Barack really wants to crush job creators. He and Pelosi will twist America into their understanding. That is big government, nanny statism.
Tax rates in this country are too high. How many Americans want their tax money to be spent on cocaine for monkeys? How many Americans want their tax money to be spent on stimulus plans that were a huge waste of money?
If you earn $250,000 you are about to be screwed. You will be selected to pay off Obama's $780,000,000,000 plan. You will be paying off this idiotic Presidents economic plan ( which failed ). Your money is getting flushed down the toilet.
Lame Ducks abound. They don't care if you are acute to what is happening in Washington. They ( the democrats in the House, still held hostage by Nancy Pelosi ) plan to do everything they can to destroy this nation.
This is childish. In 2012, Democrats will be trounsed due to their failure to act responsibly. Not just economically but also through their social bents.
IF Democrats in the House cared about "The People" they would extend tax cuts for everyone.
Can't see it .... not with the San Fransican bit#h in charge. I guess we should just learn to suffer.
Don't forget how the Democrats rammed socialistic healthcare down our throats.
Allowing the current tax rate for folks that earn less than $250,000 doesn't mean that you will see any more money in your pocket. You will not. It just means that Barack will be able to make a more drawn out payment to welfare recipients. Wealth redistribution.
Barack will be a one term President for many reasons. This is only one reason.
The House ( Nancy Pelosi ) will ********** country once again.
She believes that we should pay nonpaying taxpayers with money that we don't have. She is truly stupid.
We need a business comunity that is based in reality.
Those who are just over the $250,000 mark would see little or no increase.
Maybe so ... in taxes.
But being able to provide health insurance becomes sticky.
It now is more expensive for companies to provide insurance. Employees must contribute more.
Americans are going backwards under Obama. And it is unconstitutional to force anyone to purchase something ( socialst healthcare ) against their will.
But being able to provide health insurance becomes sticky.
It now is more expensive for companies to provide insurance. Employees must contribute more.
Americans are going backwards under Obama. And it is unconstitutional to force anyone to purchase something ( socialst healthcare ) against their will.
I do not understand why some people cannot understand this.
Now the dems will be forcing companies to stop paying for anyone HC for any employee and of course the cost is going up so they will be laying off more workers to cover the cost. In the end the consumer will pay more for goods as well.
Being FORCED to purchase something and if you do not being fined is wrong and unconstitutional.
My HC cost went up and the letter I received points out that the reason is this bill and if the second part of this bill kicks in it could possible double.
This is a scam to get those who pay for your own insurance to help those who wont work and earn their own pay for their insurance.
Total redistribution of wealth once again but slicky laid out to hide the truth.
Lets see if Obama and the dems screw over the MAJORITY of us by letting them expire.
Every American who pays should get a cuts from this bill.
Then again we have 47% of Americans being freeloaders and expecting others to pay their way.
Except for the upper 2%, we need that tax revenue to help with the deficit.
70 billion dollars a year is going to help with the deficit? On what planet?
If this administration gets their hands on 70 billion more dollars the corrupt politicians will make sure they pocket some and spend the rest,,ergo no assistance with the deficit.
70 billion dollars a year is going to help with the deficit? On what planet?
If this administration gets their hands on 70 billion more dollars the corrupt politicians will make sure they pocket some and spend the rest,,ergo no assistance with the deficit.
$70 bil here, $70 bil there, ...., you get the picture.
$70 bil here, $70 bil there, ...., you get the picture.
I do and to suggest that 70B per year already belongs to the government is fautly logic. For 10 years the taxes have been the law of the land. Allowing them to expire or not expire cannot be equated to costing the government 70 b per year. It is not the governments money, it is the people who earned it.
Except for the upper 2%, we need that tax revenue to help with the deficit.
No we need to cut spending first it is out of control. That is the only sure fire way to cut the deficit.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
