Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-20-2010, 06:33 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,080,948 times
Reputation: 17865

Advertisements

Anybody still think it's worth it?

Quote:
Congressional Budget Office - Using Biofuel Tax Credits to Achieve Energy and Environmental Policy Goals

The costs to taxpayers of reducing consumption of petroleum fuels differ by biofuel. Such costs depend on the size of the tax credit for each fuel, the changes in federal revenues that result from the difference in the excise taxes collected on sales of gasoline and biofuels, and the amount of biofuels that would have been produced if the credits had not been available. The costs to taxpayers of using a biofuel to reduce gasoline consumption by one gallon are $1.78 for ethanol made from corn and $3.00 for cellulosic ethanol. The cost of reducing an equivalent amount of diesel fuel (that is, a quantity having the same amount of energy as a gallon of gasoline) using biodiesel is $2.55, based on the tax policy in place through last year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-20-2010, 07:22 PM
 
45,237 posts, read 26,470,793 times
Reputation: 24997
It decrease fuel economy, is hostile to your car and the environment.
If that isn't enough, our federal government subsidizes it, protects it from competition and mandates it by law.
It is the ultimate boondoggle.

Last edited by Frank DeForrest; 12-20-2010 at 08:03 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2010, 07:35 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,080,948 times
Reputation: 17865
Far as I can tell this DOES NOT include the farm subsidies so it would actually be much more. Then we can throw in increased food costs... Makes you wonder what the real number is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2010, 07:59 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,966,939 times
Reputation: 7118
The Left and the environmentalists have admitted they championed a truly horrible idea (aren't all their ideas bad?), turned into policy, that didn't even come close to meeting the initial "goals", and caused a worldwide food shortage for the poorest of the poor.

More unintended consequences of bad liberal ideas.

Oh, and The Goreacle has admitted the only reason he pushed the bad policy was because he was running for president.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:02 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top