Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-17-2011, 01:10 PM
 
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
3,857 posts, read 6,958,589 times
Reputation: 1817

Advertisements

Susanna Martinez is considering reducing the film industry refundable tax credit from 25% to 15%. Production companies can get 25% back on most in-state production costs by filing a NM tax return.

Film industry decries Martinez’s proposed cut | New Mexico Business Weekly
Martinez said this will save the state, facing a $400+ million budget shortfall, $25 million in Fiscal Year 2012.

According to the New Mexico Film Office, since 2003, there has been a direct spend by 590 productions here totaling $1.2 billion, with a total economic impact of $3.6 billion, assuming a multiplier of three. In the same time period, the state approved $223.9 million in credits.

One study by the Arrowhead Center at New Mexico State University found the state lost money on the program. Another by Ernst & Young found the state recouped $1.50 for every dollar spent.

“Any kind of reduction, and particularly a 40 percent reduction, says New Mexico is now closed for business,” Arnold said in a prepared statement. “In these tough economic times, we need to do everything we can to foster job creation, and a reduction in the film incentive program is a job killer, not a solution for continued job creation.”
“By getting into the film business early, New Mexico has gained a major strategic advantage over states that are just now adopting incentives like ours,”

Major Film & Television Production List/ January 2003 – December 2010
http://www.nmfilm.com/filming/downloads/filmographyFiscalYear.pdf (broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-18-2011, 01:33 AM
 
Location: Earth
17,440 posts, read 28,607,009 times
Reputation: 7477
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary Siete View Post
Susanna Martinez is considering reducing the film industry refundable tax credit from 25% to 15%. Production companies can get 25% back on most in-state production costs by filing a NM tax return.

Film industry decries Martinez’s proposed cut | New Mexico Business Weekly
Martinez said this will save the state, facing a $400+ million budget shortfall, $25 million in Fiscal Year 2012.

According to the New Mexico Film Office, since 2003, there has been a direct spend by 590 productions here totaling $1.2 billion, with a total economic impact of $3.6 billion, assuming a multiplier of three. In the same time period, the state approved $223.9 million in credits.

One study by the Arrowhead Center at New Mexico State University found the state lost money on the program. Another by Ernst & Young found the state recouped $1.50 for every dollar spent.

“Any kind of reduction, and particularly a 40 percent reduction, says New Mexico is now closed for business,” Arnold said in a prepared statement. “In these tough economic times, we need to do everything we can to foster job creation, and a reduction in the film incentive program is a job killer, not a solution for continued job creation.”
“By getting into the film business early, New Mexico has gained a major strategic advantage over states that are just now adopting incentives like ours,”

Major Film & Television Production List/ January 2003 – December 2010
http://www.nmfilm.com/filming/downloads/filmographyFiscalYear.pdf (broken link)
The new governor of Michigan plans to eliminate film subsidies there, which have cost the state far more than they have produced in either revenues or jobs created.

If NM and MI eliminate film subsidies (which are a form of corporate welfare, and by all means should be eliminated) then more film jobs go back to California and New York. A win-win situation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-18-2011, 08:50 AM
 
3,566 posts, read 3,733,875 times
Reputation: 1364
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary Siete View Post
Susanna Martinez is considering reducing the film industry refundable tax credit from 25% to 15%. Production companies can get 25% back on most in-state production costs by filing a NM tax return.

Film industry decries Martinez’s proposed cut | New Mexico Business Weekly
Martinez said this will save the state, facing a $400+ million budget shortfall, $25 million in Fiscal Year 2012.

According to the New Mexico Film Office, since 2003, there has been a direct spend by 590 productions here totaling $1.2 billion, with a total economic impact of $3.6 billion, assuming a multiplier of three. In the same time period, the state approved $223.9 million in credits.

One study by the Arrowhead Center at New Mexico State University found the state lost money on the program. Another by Ernst & Young found the state recouped $1.50 for every dollar spent.

“Any kind of reduction, and particularly a 40 percent reduction, says New Mexico is now closed for business,” Arnold said in a prepared statement. “In these tough economic times, we need to do everything we can to foster job creation, and a reduction in the film incentive program is a job killer, not a solution for continued job creation.”
“By getting into the film business early, New Mexico has gained a major strategic advantage over states that are just now adopting incentives like ours,”

Major Film & Television Production List/ January 2003 – December 2010
http://www.nmfilm.com/filming/downloads/filmographyFiscalYear.pdf (broken link)
Can't use terms like "job killer" anymore per liberal nannies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-18-2011, 11:28 AM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,054,795 times
Reputation: 15038
Quote:
Originally Posted by majoun View Post
If NM and MI eliminate film subsidies (which are a form of corporate welfare, and by all means should be eliminated) then more film jobs go back to California and New York. A win-win situation.
Actually they just go to Canada.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-18-2011, 11:32 AM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,873,039 times
Reputation: 2519
Aren't film subsidies corporate welfare?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-18-2011, 11:32 AM
 
3,189 posts, read 4,983,145 times
Reputation: 1032
Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post
Actually they just go to Canada.
With all due respect, a film company that might want to film in New Mexico probably wants to do so for the dry desert type of background.

They would be kind of hard-pressed to find that type of landscape in Canada.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-18-2011, 11:49 AM
 
Location: Home, Home on the Front Range
25,826 posts, read 20,706,970 times
Reputation: 14818
Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post
Actually they just go to Canada.
Yep.

Interesting tactic on the part of our new 'pro-business, no new taxes' governor.

Not understanding how it would save the state money if the productions stop coming as a result of the change. 15% of 0 is still 0.
Surely those productions that are already in place or contracted will still get the 25% rate so most likely no 'savings' there.

Personally, I see it as just another attempt to undo something good that was put in place by her predecessor, regardless of the overall impact on the state.

In any event, isn't it funny how things are interpreted in our black and white world:


Martinez is a Democrat? | New Mexico Business Weekly
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-18-2011, 11:52 AM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,939,504 times
Reputation: 12828
Quote:
Originally Posted by oz in SC View Post
Aren't film subsidies corporate welfare?
But, but, but......it's Hollywood liberal welfare.

No reason in the world the entertainment industry should be receiving subsides of any kind. Businesses need to thrive or die without taxpayers underwriting them, period.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-18-2011, 11:54 AM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,873,039 times
Reputation: 2519
So corporate welfare is okay now????

Is that correct?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-18-2011, 12:41 PM
 
Location: NE CT
1,496 posts, read 3,386,215 times
Reputation: 718
Why do they deserve tax breaks in the first place when they earn millions and millions in profits on hit films? Explain one good reason for a tax break. IF they bring jobs, then those jobs are subsidized by the taxpayers and are temporary at best. I can't think of any reason to offer tax breaks to wealthy corporations, be they oil, farmers, or the film industry.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:37 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top