Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Revenues under Bush increased by 19.7% the WORST ON RECORD.
I couldn't help but notice you supplied no link to show that to be true.
Fortunately, there are lots of links using Google to prove that to be totally incorrect:
Quote:
President George W. Bush’s 2003 tax cuts generated a massive increase in federal tax revenue and were followed by 52 consecutive months of economic growth. From 2004 to 2007, federal tax revenue increased by $780 billion, the largest four-year increase in American history. Total federal revenue from 2003 to 2007:
I love it when tax and spend liberals get all high and mighty over deficits!
What if I posted a response using the same tone as yours: "I love it when moronic conservatives..." or something similar?
I notice that practically every self-described conservative turns every argument into an ugly personal attack. Why? I don't get it. This is a discussion about economics and unemployment, things so complex that a majority never agrees. I have noticed that every one of your assertions on this thread have been severely weakened by evidence AND those posters did not resort to personal or collective insults to make their point.
So you really thnik that Obama is something new in democrats who have been calling people names from evil to corrupt . Democrats basically have name their own oppositon has the evil empire for decAdes now. Their problem is they can't take tit for tat really.Its really funny to read their reaction to peaceful Tea Party rallies after years of violent protest by them.
" Mommy, do we have to pour water on our cereal again instead of milk " ?
While we are on the subject of reality, after one year, the unemployed are no longer counted in government statistics. If unemployment was computed the way BLS did it prior to 1994, the true unemployment rate (according to Shadowstats.com) would be 22.2%. I wonder why the mainstream media feels compelled to only do stories that support government statistics. There is bona fide analysis that can show government numbers are rigged to make things look better than reality.
Date: U.S. Debt
2003--$6,783,231,062,743.62
2004--$7,379,052,696,330.32
2005--$7,932,709,661,723.50
2006--$8,506,973,899,215.23
2007--$9,007,653,372,262.48
And to be factually correct...Bush had 52 consecutive months of JOB growth. Not economic growth.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
