Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
"The Shadow Party is the real power driving the Democrat machine. It is a network of radicals dedicated to transforming our constitutional republic into a socialist hive. The leader of these radicals is ... George Soros. He has essentially privatized the Democratic Party, bringing it under his personal control. The Shadow Party is the instrument through which he exerts that control.... It works by siphoning off hundreds of millions of dollars in campaign contributions that would have gone to the Democratic Party in normal times, and putting those contributions at the personal disposal of Mr. Soros. He then uses that money to buy influence and loyalty where he sees fit. In 2003, Soros set up a network of privately-owned groups which acts as a shadow or mirror image of the Party. It performs all the functions we would normally expect the real Democratic Party to perform, such as shaping the Party platform, fielding candidates, running campaigns, and so forth. However, it performs these functions under the private supervision of Mr. Soros and his associates. The Shadow Party derives its power from its ability to raise huge sums of money. By controlling the Democrat purse strings, the Shadow Party can make or break any Democrat candidate by deciding whether or not to fund him. During the 2004 election cycle, the Shadow Party raised more than $300 million for Democrat candidates, prompting one of its operatives, MoveOn PAC director Eli Pariser, to declare, 'Now it’s our party. We bought it, we own it…'"
Orly Taitz? Are you seriously citing to a letter written by Orly Taitz? You do realize that she has absolutely no credibility, right?
Anyway, trying to get back on topic - I feel at this point that SCOTUS should review the case on an expedited basis. We know what the legal arguments are, we know what the issues are, so why wait at this point?
Probably the same "excuse" as the quoted text above. You just happen to disagree with it, sweetcheeks.
I didn't know that Virginia's Attorney General is a federal judge. May be you know better?
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee
So you answered your own question, I ask you, why not expedite it?
Is there a resaon why Obama wants to wait? Heck, he should be asking for it, right, standing right up there and saying, yes, lets get this over with...or is something wrong with bill?
Eh, I didn't have a question but want to see the excuse for expediency and the need to bypass normal process.
Why would we need normal procedure, you may ask? Perhaps you can provide an answer to that as well?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TRUEGRITT
How is asking for a delay expediting?
Who is asking for a delay? And who is asking for expediting the process? You need to figure that out first. But then, is there anybody asking for a delay?
Last edited by gallowsCalibrator; 03-17-2011 at 08:41 AM..
Reason: Removed off topic banter
No, Virginia's Attorney General Ken T. Cuccinelli (Republican) has requested it. I would be curious to know the excuse he used for the need to expedite and bypass the normal procedures.
Actually that would have been US District Judge Roger Vinson who gave Obama just 7 days to file an appeal, when he declared the healthcare reform law unconstitutional..
“Because the defendants have stated that they intend to file a subsequent motion to stay if I were to ‘clarify’ that I had intended my declaratory judgment to have immediate injunction-like effect (which I just did), I will save time in this time-is-of-the-essence case by treating the motion to clarify as one requesting a stay as well,” Vinson said.
That means RUSH IT..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.