Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
March 2011: USA is still bogged down in Bush's Iraq.
Wait a minute. I thought Obama said we were finished with Iraq. At least the media and many City Data posters spun this as we were finished in Iraq. Now you're saying we're still bogged down there? Freudian moment anyone?
Quote:
Originally Posted by wade52
March 2011: USA passes control of NATO Libya operation over to allies.
The similarity was... ?
The difference is we call American warfighters in Iraq US Troops. Obama's minions call American warfighters in Libya NATO troops. Spin spin spin...
We don't have American troops in or over Libya. We have NATO troops in Libya, which mostly are comprised of Americans. Wow, can't you see the difference??? What's wrong with you?
We aren't dropping bombs on ground targets, the liberals say we have a "kinetic event" (I kid you not). See, there's a massive difference in efforts!
We have world support. Well, most countries agreed at one time or another, though most don't agree now, but that doesn't matter as long as we can say there's a difference.
So go ahead and pound those talking points. The big lie takes time to sink in...
We don't have American troops in or over Libya. We have NATO troops in Libya, which mostly are comprised of Americans. Wow, can't you see the difference??? What's wrong with you?
We aren't dropping bombs on ground targets, the liberals say we have a "kinetic event" (I kid you not). See, there's a massive difference in efforts!
We have world support. Well, most countries agreed at one time or another, though most don't agree now, but that doesn't matter as long as we can say there's a difference.
So go ahead and pound those talking points. The big lie takes time to sink in...
Please tell us all about Obama's invasion of Libya.
When you are actively attacking ground troops in their own country, you are invading their sovereign space, by definition... It is quite irrelevant if you're doing it from the ground or the air, it's still a hostile act and goes beyond the mandate of a "no fly zone". Therefore, by definition, you are invading a country.
But, as the Obama administration full of English majors likes to say, if you like to parse words and meaning, I guess we now have to define what an "invasion" is. Is this back to another Democrat era?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
