Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-03-2011, 04:53 PM
 
6,940 posts, read 9,681,455 times
Reputation: 3153

Advertisements

This proved that Republicans are even bigger hypocrites. Democrats are better at foriegn policy.

YouTube - Clinton Rips Fox on Osama Bin Laden
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-03-2011, 04:59 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
14,317 posts, read 22,388,935 times
Reputation: 18436
Default Absolutely correct

Quote:
Originally Posted by knowledgeiskey View Post
This proved that Republicans are even bigger hypocrites. Democrats are better at foriegn policy.


YouTube - Clinton Rips Fox on Osama Bin Laden
Pubs are pretty pathetic absolutely when it comes to foreign policy. Neanderthal diplomacy hasn't worked since...well the age of the Neanderthal.

Dems are superior and President Obama absolutely can't be matched by the hapless Pubs. This precision effort that Obama orchestrated to tale bin Laden out is a clear demonstration of this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2011, 05:02 PM
 
48,502 posts, read 96,867,563 times
Reputation: 18304
Clinto was actaully advised according to reports by the Sudan governamnt that they could arrest and turnover Bin Laden, The clinton administration refused the offer and when asked said it was not ware of ben laden beig a terroist that threatened the US. Even when the first world trade building bombing happened;Clinton administration viewed it has a law enforcement problem ;not a national security problem ;so NYPD investiagted it ;not the federal authorities. That paints a different picture of just what Clinton view as the threat of terrorism.That paihnts a picture of a administrtion under clinto that was lacks to say the least about terrorism threat even after the first bombing much less the number across the world.Kind of reminds you of Obams satement on when to invene verus his Libya action or his voting against raising the deficit when Bush was presdient or Gtimo military7 trials under Bush. Can you say flip-flop and plain ole Lying is common with liberals.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2011, 05:03 PM
 
Location: Neither here nor there
14,810 posts, read 16,209,541 times
Reputation: 33001
Do you really expect anyone to believe what comes out of the mouth of an impeached president who admittedly PERJURED himself?????
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2011, 05:05 PM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,755,547 times
Reputation: 3146
Too funny, Clinton is such a tool. Talk about revisionist history? The guy fired a $100 million missile at a ten cent tent, that was the extent of his pursuit of Obama.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2011, 05:06 PM
 
Location: On Top
12,373 posts, read 13,196,047 times
Reputation: 4027
Quote:
Originally Posted by knowledgeiskey View Post
This proved that Republicans are even bigger hypocrites. Democrats are better at foriegn policy.


YouTube - Clinton Rips Fox on Osama Bin Laden
I remember that interview, first time I realized what an idiot Wallace and FOX News was.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2011, 05:16 PM
 
Location: Illinois Delta
5,767 posts, read 5,015,996 times
Reputation: 2063
Quote:
Originally Posted by texdav View Post
Clinto was actaully advised according to reports by the Sudan governamnt that they could arrest and turnover Bin Laden, The clinton administration refused the offer and when asked said it was not ware of ben laden beig a terroist that threatened the US. Even when the first world trade building bombing happened;Clinton administration viewed it has a law enforcement problem ;not a national security problem ;so NYPD investiagted it ;not the federal authorities. That paints a different picture of just what Clinton view as the threat of terrorism.That paihnts a picture of a administrtion under clinto that was lacks to say the least about terrorism threat even after the first bombing much less the number across the world.Kind of reminds you of Obams satement on when to invene verus his Libya action or his voting against raising the deficit when Bush was presdient or Gtimo military7 trials under Bush. Can you say flip-flop and plain ole Lying is common with liberals.

Like Condi Rice?


YouTube - Condoleezza Rice asserts 'Bin Laden Determined To Attack' wasn't a warning. thumpandwhip.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2011, 05:21 PM
 
Location: Columbus
4,877 posts, read 4,508,466 times
Reputation: 1450
Quote:
Originally Posted by A_Lexus View Post
Dems are superior and President Obama absolutely can't be matched by the hapless Pubs. This precision effort that Obama orchestrated to tale bin Laden out is a clear demonstration of this.
I like the way people are playing this up as a repudiation of the Bush approach to the war on terror. Yet this only makes sense if Obama himself had actually repudiated that approach. He has instead tripled down in Afghanistan, continued the war in Iraq, multiplied the drone attacks many times over, and continued to treat international law as well as the U.S. Constitution as flexible rules in the waging of war and enforcement of national security.

His policy is the same as George W. Bush and the Republicans plan.

And President Obama has already promised us more war:

bin Laden's "death does not mark the end of our effort. There’s no doubt that al Qaeda will continue to pursue attacks against us. We must – and we will – remain vigilant at home and abroad. . . . The cause of securing our country is not complete."

Hope and Change.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2011, 05:24 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,950,814 times
Reputation: 7118
Talk about revisionist history. Whew!

Clinton, throughout the 90's, attack after attack, did NOTHING to get OBL. In fact, he was handed to him on a silver platter at least twice and Bubba declined, saying they didn't have enough evidence on him.

Those attacks led directly to 9/11. OBL even stated on a few occasions he thought the US weak and could not stomach at fight - and he got that opinion from Clinton's inaction.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2011, 05:28 PM
 
Location: Metro Phoenix
11,039 posts, read 16,866,369 times
Reputation: 12950
I remember when Clinton launched missiles at OBL.

The republicans came out the next day saying the attack was uncalled for and kept referencing, over and over, the movie "Wag The Dog" because the Lewinsky scandal was a-brewin'.

It was one of the things that pissed me off so much after 9/11.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:54 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top