Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-06-2011, 08:06 AM
 
13,689 posts, read 9,009,247 times
Reputation: 10408

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by natalie469 View Post
Actually there is a lot you can do with a history major. I know several people in top companies with that degree. They know how to write and research more than most. My son will also graduate with that degree but has no interest in teaching. He is going to graduate school for International Relations. They said having a history degree was a plus.
Actually, she got married while in college, and afterwards starting having children. By the time she needed to enter the workforce her degree was years behind her, and hence had become pretty worthless (I guess potential employers look at a resume and say "So, history major. Graduated, what, 20 years ago? Nothing since? Excuse me while I eat this sandwich and stare at you").
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-06-2011, 08:07 AM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,752,619 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
Considering there haven't been many months over the last decade adding 240K plus jobs, I will take any glimmer of hope.
LOL, I like your time frame. Try looking at job creation coming out of recessions. Also we have never spent as much to create so few jobs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2011, 08:08 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,818,277 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
actually the job growth average for 2005 was over 200k a month
Jobs in Jan 2001: 132.47 million
Jobs in Jan 2005: 132.45 million (Jobs were lost)

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2011, 08:10 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,108,083 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
Considering there haven't been many months over the last decade adding 240K plus jobs, I will take any glimmer of hope.
Yeah, we havent had many months of this type of growth over the last decade, only the following periods have we had higher growth

2001 we had March, April, May, June
2002 we had March, April, May June
2003 we had March, April, May, June, October
2004 we had March, April, May, June, October, November,
2005 we had Feb, March, April, May, June, October, November
2006 we had Feb, March, April, May, June, November
etc

Note the pattern..
EVERY YEAR we have this type of job growth during April
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2011, 08:10 AM
 
9,848 posts, read 8,281,707 times
Reputation: 3296
What would it be without the big McDonald's 60,000 hiring day, 12%?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2011, 08:13 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,108,083 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
Jobs in Jan 2001: 132.47 million
Jobs in Jan 2005: 132.45 million (Jobs were lost)
2005 had private job growth of
Jan 404K
March 746K
April 1.195M
May 806K
June 1.116M
July 6K
Aug 213K
Sept -402K
Oct 251K
Nov 406K
Dec -94K

Net INCREASE..

Why dont you stop lying when the data is so easily proven correct ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/suppl/empsit.compaeu.txt (broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2011, 08:14 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,108,083 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by shorebaby View Post
LOL, I like your time frame. Try looking at job creation coming out of recessions. Also we have never spent as much to create so few jobs.
Even more important, EVERY YEAR we have job growth in April over the last decade (except 2009).. These people are acting like this is something out of the norm...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2011, 08:20 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,818,277 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by shorebaby View Post
LOL, I like your time frame. Try looking at job creation coming out of recessions. Also we have never spent as much to create so few jobs.
It doesn’t take much to like anything, it does to be able to analyze and discuss it. So, your next excuse is coming out of recession. Let us see, job growth in private sector over two years following 2001 recession:
Nov 2001: 109.58 million
Oct 2003: 108.57 million

Forget about gains, over a million jobs were lost. Perhaps that is your idea of a fine economic growth? Compared to that debacle, how have we done since the end of current recession?
Jun 2009: 107.94 million
Feb 2011: 108.36 million

That, sire, is a growth in the positive territory.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2011, 08:26 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,818,277 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
2005 had private job growth of
Jan 404K
March 746K
April 1.195M
May 806K
June 1.116M
July 6K
Aug 213K
Sept -402K
Oct 251K
Nov 406K
Dec -94K

Net INCREASE..

Why dont you stop lying when the data is so easily proven correct ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/suppl/empsit.compaeu.txt (broken link)
Would you mind disputing the numbers I provided? Would you mind providing a link that proves that there was a positive growth over first four years of this decade? BTW, jobs did grow in 2005 (but that would be fifth year since the beginning), with 2.21 million jobs added over 12 months. That averages out to about 184K jobs per month over a period you thought was great, while you're trying to dismiss a job growth of 244K in April 2011. Good lord.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2011, 08:31 AM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,971 posts, read 22,151,621 times
Reputation: 13801
Quote:
Originally Posted by Antlered Chamataka View Post
You guys are missing the point. They are not hiring the unemployed folks back. For some reason, they are not very attractive for the employers. So they continue to sit on unemployment and that keeps swelling the numbers. In the meantime, there are more layoffs.

Jobs added doesn't mean a thing if the unemployment is not coming down and is in fact, awfully increasing
The unemployment number are down because a lot of folks are not looking for work, and the feds took them off the employment roles. Once people do see a future they will start looking for work the unemployment numbers will go up; the real unemployment is 16%.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:50 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top