Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-09-2011, 08:59 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,583,836 times
Reputation: 27720

Advertisements

But the EPA said don't worry..it will become diluted.
And we all know where the Mississippi empties into don't we ?
Why have limits at all seeing that anything that gets dumped, accidently or not, gets dismissed by the EPA and never becomes a hazard.
Then again..what could they possibly do even if it's a hazard..close off the Mississippi River ?



Nuclear Regulatory Commission Investigates Radioactive Water Dump into Flooded Mississippi River | Huntington News
"Although Tritum has been called one of the least dangerous radionuclides, the beta radioactive substancebombards cells and damages DNA when inhaled or swallowed, and can persist in the body for more than ten years upon exposure. Its perpetual effect on cells can lead to all sorts of serious diseases, including, but not limited to, gene mutations, birth defects, and cancer."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-09-2011, 09:00 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,305,779 times
Reputation: 3826
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
But the EPA said don't worry..it will become diluted.
Communism WIN!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2011, 09:01 AM
 
14,917 posts, read 13,117,788 times
Reputation: 4828
Do you mean tritium?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2011, 09:01 AM
 
19,226 posts, read 15,340,608 times
Reputation: 2337
Quote:
Originally Posted by summers73 View Post
Communism WIN!
It's all about sharing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2011, 09:03 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,305,779 times
Reputation: 3826
Quote:
Originally Posted by ergohead View Post
It's all about sharing.
I guess they were right when they said that socialism is indeed a cancer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2011, 09:04 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,583,836 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by hammertime33 View Post
Do you mean tritium?
Thanks for that catch..I fixed the thread title but left the misspelling in the article. So much for spellcheck and understanding what you are writing about. Journalists these days.....

Last edited by HappyTexan; 05-09-2011 at 10:06 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2011, 09:44 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,851,841 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
But the EPA said don't worry..it will become diluted. And we all know where the Mississippi empties into don't we ?
Why have limits at all seeing that anything that gets dumped, accidently or not, gets dismissed by the EPA and never becomes a hazard...
OMG, the big government is getting in the way. Tritium is a greater hazard since EPA said something about it. If EPA didn't exist, all would have been fine.

A less sensationalist version would have been... a nuclear power plant accidently releases tritium into the river. The EPA studies the sample and concludes that the proportion is not something to worry about.

And that worry (or not) requires setting limits and measuring against it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2011, 10:07 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,583,836 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
OMG, the big government is getting in the way. Tritium is a greater hazard since EPA said something about it. If EPA didn't exist, all would have been fine.

A less sensationalist version would have been... a nuclear power plant accidently releases tritium into the river. The EPA studies the sample and concludes that the proportion is not something to worry about.

And that worry (or not) requires setting limits and measuring against it.
No it's not fine. It's that the EPA said it was fine so you sheep can just continue living your BAU life.

They don't know how much got released. Alarms went off AFTER it was dumped.
It was an abandoned unit and they were just releasing "rain water".

Guess you didn't read the article ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2011, 10:16 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,851,841 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
No it's not fine. It's that the EPA said it was fine so you sheep can just continue living your BAU life.

They don't know how much got released. Alarms went off AFTER it was dumped. It was an abandoned unit and they were just releasing "rain water".

Guess you didn't read the article ?
You must be proud for having created the opportunity to use "so you sheep" in a sentence. Where is Limbaugh when you could use his direction? At least you're not blaming EPA for being responsible for the leak (yet).

Not knowing the exact amount of tritium released is inconsequential on a broader sense. There is no need to be an alarmist at this point, certainly not to those who're aware of how much tritium may be used/found at a typical reactor. Do you know better?

For that matter, what did you want EPA to do right after the company that owns the facility filed a report?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2011, 10:16 AM
 
Location: Vermont
11,762 posts, read 14,675,748 times
Reputation: 18539
Typical behavior by Entergy. They've been scrambling to fix the tritium leaks here in Vermont, where it was leaking from pipes that just a few months earlier they claimed didn't even exist.

In my view the most important fact isn't the tritium, it's Entergy's insouciant attitude toward safety and reliability practices in genera (http://http://greenmountaindaily.com/search.do - broken link)l. If they lied (or didn't know) about the pipes at Vermont Yankee, what else are they lying about or ignorant of?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top