Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-15-2011, 03:00 PM
 
2,963 posts, read 6,260,599 times
Reputation: 1578

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by civic89 View Post
You did state that they were born, See below. Stop lying so much, you forget what you say.

If what you wrote was true, blacks would vote dem/rep about 50/50%.

Welfare has replaced the father.

80% of all blacks are born to a single mother.

What "good' are people doing in the black...
Yeah I just nailed him on that, he is somehow claiming that blacks are born to a single mother but they aren't born because of abortion, wtf? How can that contribute to the statistic if they are aborted?

 
Old 06-15-2011, 03:01 PM
 
41 posts, read 28,871 times
Reputation: 34
Where is your source? I have given you multiple sources that show your opinion is based on nonsense.


Quote:
Originally Posted by SamBarrow View Post
It's actually 70%. 64% in 2000. Go back through this thread, I've posted links. It can actually add up pretty easily, it just means they get pregnant more.
 
Old 06-15-2011, 03:02 PM
 
6,137 posts, read 4,860,018 times
Reputation: 1517
Quote:
Originally Posted by civic89 View Post
Where is your source? I have given you multiple sources that show your opinion is based on nonsense.
I'm not trying to dig it up right now. You posted some numbers, you did not post a source. Go back through this thread, you'll see it. Or a simple Google search.
 
Old 06-15-2011, 03:03 PM
 
41 posts, read 28,871 times
Reputation: 34
I did post a source. Here you go again. You probably don't want to look at it lol!!!.

http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/hus10.pdf#007



Quote:
Originally Posted by SamBarrow View Post
I'm not trying to dig it up right now. You posted some numbers, you did not post a source. Go back through this thread, you'll see it. Or a simple Google search.
 
Old 06-15-2011, 03:07 PM
 
6,137 posts, read 4,860,018 times
Reputation: 1517
Quote:
Originally Posted by civic89 View Post
I did post a source. Here you go again. You probably don't want to look at it lol!!!.

http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/hus10.pdf#007
563 pages... help me out here man where is it.

Out-of-Wedlock Births in Black America : NPR
An Analysis of Out-Of-Wedlock Births in the United States - Brookings Institution
 
Old 06-15-2011, 03:27 PM
 
41 posts, read 28,871 times
Reputation: 34
Sam,

Let's not play games here. If you clicked the link you would see it. Guess it does not match up with your biased opinions. I also see your data stops in 1984. It's on the first page under the header of
Table 7. Nonmarital childbearing, by detailed race and Hispanic origin of mother, and maternal age: United States, selected years 1970–2007

Quote:
Originally Posted by SamBarrow View Post
 
Old 06-15-2011, 03:28 PM
 
6,137 posts, read 4,860,018 times
Reputation: 1517
Quote:
Originally Posted by civic89 View Post
Sam,

Let's not play games here. If you clicked the link you would see it. Guess it does not match up with your biased opinions. It's on the first page under the header of
[SIZE=2]
Table 7. Nonmarital childbearing, by detailed race and Hispanic origin of mother, and maternal age: United States, [SIZE=2]
selected years 1970–2007


[/SIZE]
[/SIZE]
LOL. Can you not read??? Your source says 71.2% as of 2007. I'm going to post a screen shot since I know you'll just deny it.

Wow, okay you can't seem to read the posts either. The 70% is out of wedlock births. Not live births.

 
Old 06-15-2011, 03:32 PM
 
41 posts, read 28,871 times
Reputation: 34
Sam you are not to bright. This is based on 1,000 persons not 100. So 71.2 is not a percent. Out of 1000 out of wedlock births 71.2 are black not 71.2%. Keep trying. SMH!!!


Quote:
Originally Posted by SamBarrow View Post
LOL. Can you not read??? Your source says 71.2% as of 2007. I'm going to post a screen shot since I know you'll just deny it.
 
Old 06-15-2011, 03:37 PM
 
2,963 posts, read 6,260,599 times
Reputation: 1578
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamBarrow View Post
LOL. Can you not read??? Your source says 71.2% as of 2007. I'm going to post a screen shot since I know you'll just deny it.

Wow, okay you can't seem to read the posts either. The 70% is out of wedlock births. Not live births.
linux?
 
Old 06-15-2011, 03:37 PM
 
6,137 posts, read 4,860,018 times
Reputation: 1517
Quote:
Originally Posted by civic89 View Post
Sam you are not to bright. This is based on 1,000 persons not 100. So 71.2 is not a percent. Out of 1000 out of wedlock births 71.2 are black not 71.2%. Keep trying. SMH!!!
Jesus christ dude. It is a percentage. Look at the screenshot sir. Look at it. LOOK!

The figure you're referring to is LIVE births, not OUT OF WEDLOCK births.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top