Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Using these standards, I've got tens of millions in debt, Obama should just resign now because surly someone will start a draft pghquest for President movement.. haha... these liberals are always glad to provide us with non stop humor..
I personally don't give a rat's hindquarters about Newt's personal finances, as long as they're legal. He certainly makes enough money to have credit lines at Tiffany's and other high end retailers.
What happened is that Newt has said that if a person is running for president, their whole life should be fair game for questioning. Nothing off limits. Yet, when he was asked about this particular personal detail, he got very prickly and tried to say it was none of anyone's business. By his own previously stated standards, it was fair game.
Last policial race I was in was for County Commissioner, spent exactly $10.42 and came in 3rd out of a field of 8 people. The next lowest amount spent on a campaign, $110,000.
I personally don't give a rat's hindquarters about Newt's personal finances, as long as they're legal. He certainly makes enough money to have credit lines at Tiffany's and other high end retailers.
What happened is that Newt has said that if a person is running for president, their whole life should be fair game for questioning. Nothing off limits. Yet, when he was asked about this particular personal detail, he got very prickly and tried to say it was none of anyone's business. By his own previously stated standards, it was fair game.
We've known that Newt is a hyprocrite since the 90s. Nothing new here.
I personally don't give a rat's hindquarters about Newt's personal finances, as long as they're legal. He certainly makes enough money to have credit lines at Tiffany's and other high end retailers.
What happened is that Newt has said that if a person is running for president, their whole life should be fair game for questioning. Nothing off limits. Yet, when he was asked about this particular personal detail, he got very prickly and tried to say it was none of anyone's business. By his own previously stated standards, it was fair game.
He's paying his bills, so I'm not sure what the point is.. If Tiffanies a place people arent allowed to shop at?
Quote:
Originally Posted by WestCobb
We've known that Newt is a hyprocrite since the 90s. Nothing new here.
Where is the Newt hypocracy? All I see it is someone went into Newts personal finances and released them illegally. The hypocracy is many on the left saying things like Obamas school records are immaterial, but now proclaiming Newt having a line of credit should be open to the world..
He's paying his bills, so I'm not sure what the point is.. If Tiffanies a place people arent allowed to shop at?
Where is the Newt hypocracy? All I see it is someone went into Newts personal finances and released them illegally. The hypocracy is many on the left saying things like Obamas school records are immaterial, but now proclaiming Newt having a line of credit should be open to the world..
You didn't read my post. Newt said your whole life should be fair game for questioning when you're running for president. But HIS personal life is NOT fair game, even though he's running for president.
The fact that he has these credit lines, as I already stated, is immaterial.
I usually make it a point not to respond to you because you're absolutely ridiculously partisan, more of a cult member than anything else, but just in case you may allow a little contrarian truth to pentrate your brain, I will tell you I was referring to Newt's affair in the 90s, at the same time he was castigating Clinton for ... an affair.
You didn't read my post. Newt said your whole life should be fair game for questioning when you're running for president. But HIS personal life is NOT fair game, even though he's running for president.
The fact that he has these credit lines, as I already stated, is immaterial.
By his own "rules", that's hypocrisy.
I read your posting, I just disagree with your synopsis. Releasing personal finances about another individual is ILLEGAL, thus saying your information is "fair game" one could conclude that they are discussing LEGAL methods, unless of course you support violating laws, which I doubt you do.
I usually make it a point not to respond to you because you're absolutely ridiculously partisan, more of a cult member than anything else, but just in case you may allow a little contrarian truth to pentrate your brain, I will tell you I was referring to Newt's affair in the 90s, at the same time he was castigating Clinton for ... an affair.
Maybe you are better off not responding to me in the future, because I wont need to embarass you AGAIN for being WRONG..
Newt was going after Clinton for LYING UNDER OATH.. A CRIME.. A FELONY, Martha Stewart went to jail for less. Not for having an affair..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
